Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 1:33 am
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2016 at 1:33 am by SteelCurtain.)
(December 11, 2016 at 12:48 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: Some general thoughts... 1. Prosecution of those found abusing the system through fraud, or falsification of eligibility.
It is already illegal to commit fraud and abuse the system. The problem is catching people. As you probably know, welfare offices are not the best funded, and there are usually hundreds or thousands of recipients per worker. If you'd like to push for better funding for welfare departments, that'd be a solution to this problem.
(December 11, 2016 at 12:48 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: 2. A much better screening process to evaluate and identify those in need. (I am all for offering substantial help to the less fortunate, especially those willing to give an honest effort)
See above. Hundreds/Thousands of applicants and very few employees to do thorough screening. Online forms filled out and decisions made in seconds. Has to be that way if you don't want a hulking bureaucracy.
(December 11, 2016 at 12:48 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: 3. Drug screening! No need to elaborate.
You know how conservatives are always saying that states are the laboratories of democracy? Well, several states have tried this. My state, Tennessee, tried this. Not only did they deny benefits to 30 families out of nearly 30,000 (that's .1%), it cost these states a bunch of money. Missouri spent over $350,000 to catch 48 people out of over 38,000 applicants.
Repeat this same deal in the 5 other states that have tried these (ultimately unconstitutional) laws, and you have a very ineffectual system that costs a lot of money.
And the numbers bear it out. People on welfare programs are not more likely to be drug abusers. ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15787954 as well)
Also, when you punish the parents, you are punishing the most at-risk members of our society--the children. Should children in poverty be punished for the failings of their parents? Should they go without food or a house because their parents smoke weed or struggle with addiction?
The best and most effective measure against abuse in this light has been EBT cards. They keep cash out of people's hands and a restricted in which stores they can be used.
(December 11, 2016 at 12:48 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: 4. Some form of limit on benefits, either through time or amount of benefits. Though this is a tough one as every case is different.
Most states have review periods and limits on benefits, and federal law restricts TANF benefits to no more than 60 months. Unemployment benefits are shorter.
(December 11, 2016 at 12:48 am)PETE_ROSE Wrote: I work more hours than anyone I know. I enjoy helping others, and support social programs. We all will benefit from others prospering. That said, funds are limited. Those truly in need will benefit most by having these programs remain funded by weeding out the riff raff.
Weeding out the riff raff is fine, but ultimately a platonic ideal. There will always be people that game the system. The numbers, however, show that these people are rarer than it seems. We count the hits and not the misses. We look at the people we see doing the gaming and forget about the tens of thousands of people who need it and are doing it right.
One of the biggest drivers of welfare is low wages for full time workers. You want to get people off the dole? Support legislation for raising the minimum wage.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 2087
Threads: 65
Joined: August 30, 2015
Reputation:
24
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 1:35 am
I'll never understand why people are okay with wasting money on drug screening for those one welfare. I mean the states that have tried it have found that it isn't going to save money. Cut the millions to spend on drug testing, and you'd save more money than if you eliminate the drug users on welfare.
Of course we all know with Conservatives it's not really about saving money. It's about shaming people on welfare by making them take drug tests.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 2:05 am
If anything, we should be paying for people addicted to drugs to go to rehab so they can get their lives back on track.
People seem to forget that drug addiction is a real problem. Its not something many people can just give up.
The problem isn't that people are on welfare and spending their money on drugs, it's that they are addicted to drugs in the first place. If you take away their welfare you aren't going to stop them doing drugs, which means they'll be in an even worse financial situation. Get them off the drugs by actually helping them rather than punishing them.
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
66
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 2:32 am
(December 10, 2016 at 8:00 pm)Loading Please Wait Wrote: Why bust my ass at work 60+ hours a week when I could work part time and get Medicaid and foodstamps?
You talk the talk, big man. I fucking dare you to walk the walk, even for a year. Why not live like those that you so easily pass down judgement upon? You said it yourself - they have it great!
What are you waiting for?! Quit your job and sign on already!!
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
66
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 2:42 am
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2016 at 2:44 am by Iroscato.)
Oh, and heaven forbid poor people buy things that might bring them some enjoyment and pleasure. So what...because they currently lack employment, they shouldn't be allowed to eat steak as and when their meagre budgets can stretch to it?
So what's the solution? Install anti-steak guards at every shop in the country to viciously beat the unemployed into submission every time they attempt to purchase their dead cow? Give the unemployed juuuuuust enough to allow them to not starve to death, forever hovering on the knife-edge of starvation, unable to experience even the merest momentary sliver of joy? We could just cut all government support permanently... there's no way that would cause 98% of the unemployed to turn to crime as their survival instinct overrides the fear of retribution, no sir.
Oooh! We could force them into work programs for their benefits, thereby violating one of the most fundamental tenets of the worker-employee agreement (fair work=fair wages) and treat them as the üntermensch that they are - hey, they're just the unemployed! They're not...y'know...human or anything.
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 2:51 am
But you don't understand, Iro. He saw some of them buying seafood.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
66
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 2:54 am
Well shit. Forget, like, EVERYTHING I just said.
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 23132
Threads: 26
Joined: February 2, 2010
Reputation:
106
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 4:47 am
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2016 at 4:50 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(December 11, 2016 at 2:05 am)Tiberius Wrote: If you take away their welfare you aren't going to stop them doing drugs, which means they'll be in an even worse financial situation.
And gosh, I wonder what they'll be doing at that point to score the next fix?
This is exactly how criminalizing drugs feeds the broader crime rate.
(December 11, 2016 at 2:05 am)Tiberius Wrote: Get them off the drugs by actually helping them rather than punishing them.
I'd be willing to bet that the cure for drugs is a Hell of a lot cheaper than the War on Drugs . To be fair, many addicts simply won't come out the other side of the program clean and sober; addiction is a harsh taskmaster. But it seems to me to be 1) more financially responsible (on the social level) to focus on intervention rather than punitive justice, considering that it costs about $31,000 on average to incarcerate a convict for a year, and 2) will produce more for society, given that recovering addicts without a prison record have more chances to pay back, in real terms, the debt they've incurred (financial or moral, take your pick) to society for its help in rescuing their live. On a pragmatic as well as moral level, supporting their recovery is IMO the right thing to do.
Posts: 8277
Threads: 47
Joined: September 12, 2015
Reputation:
42
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 7:55 am
(This post was last modified: December 11, 2016 at 8:11 am by Pat Mustard.)
Read the Spirit Level. It explains why countries with stronger welfare systems and more equal wealth distributions are better for all living there.
(December 10, 2016 at 2:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Ideally, help for the needy would come strictly from charity rather than the government. Unfortunately, it isnt enough bc many ppl dont give. But if you want to change this personally for yourself, you can factor in whatever you give to charity when doing your taxes, and you won't have to pay as much to the government.
Government distribution is far better than charitable distribution. All too often charities (even secular ones) discriminate in favour of "people like us". Plus with government distribution you've got economies of scale and better protection against fraud (for example, in Ireland there's barely a charity that hasn't had problems with misuse of funds and nepotistic business dealings or hirings in the last five years).
(December 10, 2016 at 6:43 pm)Loading Please Wait Wrote: Yes this thread has turned into a white male supremacist debate.
So you don't actually give a shit about anybody else, but you care enough about your image in front of others to find a rationalisation to jusitfy your greed and lack of empathy. Got it.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Posts: 6002
Threads: 252
Joined: January 2, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Why should my hard earned money go to those less fortunate?
December 11, 2016 at 8:47 am
One thing I never understood about the benefits system at least where I live and I'm assuming it's the same over the UK.
At first people on benefits got stuff purely for free because they couldn't find a job. But surely there's always something to do. If it's street sweeping cleaning, making the area look better in general.
Then it went in the other direction and people on benefits had to work for free as part of some scheme. It wasn't exactly free but I'm pretty sure it was way below minum wage. So again it goes back to, the government has the money that they're going to be paid anyway, there are jobs to be done. Just pay them the wage and get them working. Rather than have them work for near enough free which is close to slavery, or give them stuff for free which is just forcing other people to pay for their things.
It's like someone has skipped a really nice middle ground between giving things away free to people or put them into slavery.
I'm probably over looking some complication I'm not aware of here but that's been my thoughts on it when I worked with people at my old work place who had to be there for hours to earn their benefits which wasn't as much as I'm being paid.
Also my thoughts when I've known people who didn't mind being on benefits and wanted to claim more by pretending to be mentally depressed or whatever their scheme was.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
|