Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 28, 2016 at 6:56 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2016 at 7:01 pm by abaris.)
(December 28, 2016 at 6:39 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: That's a false dichotomy. Another, alternative instance: That someone, or some group, may support a candidate not on the basis that they think the candidate is great, but rather on the basis that they hate the competing candidate more.
Also, an interesting tidbit for you: the suffragetes - that is; first-wave feminism - had the support of the KKK.
I don't give a shit about the suffragetes.
And the hate the competing candidate doesn't fly either. There's an N word at the end of his second term. One would think they'd have fallen over themselves in endorsing McCain or Romney. But for some reason they didn't.
And by the way, take it from the horse's mouth. That's what David Duke said.
Quote:“I love it,” Duke told the LA Times. “The fact that Donald Trump’s doing so well, it proves that I’m winning. I am winning.”
http://time.com/4514350/david-duke-donal...louisiana/
Posts: 2844
Threads: 169
Joined: August 24, 2012
Reputation:
46
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 28, 2016 at 7:24 pm
I've noticed a similarity between the far-left and the far-right that applies to this thread.
Both like to make a LOT of noise, but neither of them are especially good at listening to other people. Actual empathy, actually understanding other people's positions, it's so damn rare it's like a fucking super power.
I live on facebook. Come see me there. http://www.facebook.com/tara.rizzatto
"If you cling to something as the absolute truth and you are caught in it, when the truth comes in person to knock on your door you will refuse to let it in." ~ Siddhartha Gautama
Posts: 3064
Threads: 3
Joined: July 10, 2016
Reputation:
37
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 28, 2016 at 7:50 pm
(December 28, 2016 at 7:24 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I've noticed a similarity between the far-left and the far-right that applies to this thread.
Both like to make a LOT of noise, but neither of them are especially good at listening to other people. Actual empathy, actually understanding other people's positions, it's so damn rare it's like a fucking super power.
I definitely agree that this is a common problem. I'd also like to add that it is far too common for people to label someone else as one of these two extremes simply because they are even slightly left or right wing on any topic.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: What is it with Trump supporters not wanting to discuss policy without name calling
December 28, 2016 at 8:00 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2016 at 8:01 pm by Amarok.)
(December 28, 2016 at 6:56 pm)abaris Wrote: (December 28, 2016 at 6:39 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: That's a false dichotomy. Another, alternative instance: That someone, or some group, may support a candidate not on the basis that they think the candidate is great, but rather on the basis that they hate the competing candidate more.
Also, an interesting tidbit for you: the suffragetes - that is; first-wave feminism - had the support of the KKK.
I don't give a shit about the suffragetes.
And the hate the competing candidate doesn't fly either. There's an N word at the end of his second term. One would think they'd have fallen over themselves in endorsing McCain or Romney. But for some reason they didn't.
And by the way, take it from the horse's mouth. That's what David Duke said.
Quote:“I love it,” Duke told the LA Times. “The fact that Donald Trump’s doing so well, it proves that I’m winning. I am winning.”
http://time.com/4514350/david-duke-donal...louisiana/
indeed if they hated Hilary they had 100 other choices they sided with the baddies live with it
(December 28, 2016 at 6:56 pm)abaris Wrote: (December 28, 2016 at 6:39 pm)CanOfMountainDew Wrote: That's a false dichotomy. Another, alternative instance: That someone, or some group, may support a candidate not on the basis that they think the candidate is great, but rather on the basis that they hate the competing candidate more.
Also, an interesting tidbit for you: the suffragetes - that is; first-wave feminism - had the support of the KKK.
I don't give a shit about the suffragetes.
And the hate the competing candidate doesn't fly either. There's an N word at the end of his second term. One would think they'd have fallen over themselves in endorsing McCain or Romney. But for some reason they didn't.
And by the way, take it from the horse's mouth. That's what David Duke said.
Quote:“I love it,” Duke told the LA Times. “The fact that Donald Trump’s doing so well, it proves that I’m winning. I am winning.”
http://time.com/4514350/david-duke-donal...louisiana/
indeed if they hated Hilary they had 100 other choices they sided with the baddies live with it
(December 28, 2016 at 7:24 pm)TaraJo Wrote: I've noticed a similarity between the far-left and the far-right that applies to this thread.
Both like to make a LOT of noise, but neither of them are especially good at listening to other people. Actual empathy, actually understanding other people's positions, it's so damn rare it's like a fucking super power.
right chatter is like country music not worth listening too
and i have no master
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|