Did man get here by evolution or by creation???

[solja247]

The title of the thread is in fact a book, published in 1967. A small blue book 'refuting' evolution.
I began to read it and to my dismay, creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago! Should we expect any different? After all, they oppose evolution. If their arguements had evolved, they would be hypocrites! However, most creationists do believe in micro evolution and one can see they have micro evolved. From little blue books in the 60s to cool flash websites like Answers in Genesis...
Anyways, my point is, until, if ever, creationists have any convincing scientific arguements, all threads contending evolution should not be classified as science or in this part of the forum!

[Minimalist]

"creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago"



And this surprises you?

[LastPoet]

Hey, taking in consideration the amount of sheep that propagate such nonsense, it strikes no surprise to me!

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

"creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago"
And this surprises you?

I think you'll find many of the arguments have been used since Darwin's time. Most noticeably,the teleological argument. (argument from design)

[Jax]

---

In the Name of Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful
1. When the earth is shaken with its (final) earthquake.2. And when the earth throws out its burdens,3. And man will say: "What is

the matter with it?"4. That Day it will declare its information (about all what happened over it of good or evil).5. Because your Lord

has inspired it.6. That Day mankind will proceed in scattered groups that they may be shown their deeds.7. So whosoever does

good equal to the weight of an atom (or a small ant), shall see it.8. And whosoever does evil equal to the weight of an atom (or a

small ant), shall see it.


In the Name of Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful
1. Al-Qari'ah (the striking Hour i.e. the Day of Resurrection),2. What is the striking (Hour)?3. And what will make you know what the

striking (Hour) is?4. It is a Day whereon mankind will be like moths scattered about,5. And the mountains will be like carded wool,
6. Then as for him whose balance (of good deeds) will be heavy,7. He will live a pleasant life (in Paradise).8. But as for him whose

balance (of good deeds) will be light,9. He will have his home in Hawiyah (pit, i.e. Hell).10. And what will make you know what it is?
11. (It is) a hot blazing Fire!


In the Name of Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful
1. Say (O Muhammad ()): "He is Allah, (the) One.2. "Allah-us-Samad (The Self-Sufficient Master, Whom all creatures need, He neither

eats nor drinks).3. "He begets not, nor was He begotten;4. "And there is none co-equal or comparable unto Him


http://www.guidedways.com/hadith_books.php

---

I wonder which one is stronger, the spam hammer or the ban hammer?

[OnlyNatural]

The title of the thread is in fact a book, published in 1967. A small blue book 'refuting' evolution.

LOL I actually have this book, I found it in my grandma's house. It certainly gave me a good laugh, but I was sad to think that the majority of people in the world don't have the science background to see past the weak arguments within in. People are still swallowing creationism today, after all. It doesn't seem to require new, evolved, better arguments, just an uneducated audience.

[lilphil1989]

---

The title of the thread is in fact a book, published in 1967. A small blue book 'refuting' evolution.
I began to read it and to my dismay, creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago! Should we expect any different? After all, they oppose evolution. If their arguements had evolved, they would be hypocrites! However, most creationists do believe in micro evolution and one can see they have micro evolved. From little blue books in the 60s to cool flash websites like Answers in Genesis...
Anyways, my point is, until, if ever, creationists have any convincing scientific arguements, all threads contending evolution should not be classified as science or in this part of the forum!

---

Of course the arguments haven't changed. Because these people generally don't care whether or not what they're saying is actually true, as long as it supports their warped worldview; so it doesn't matter how often their arguments are refuted, they'll just keep on recycling them.


Justmoha2005: Reported for spamming irrelevant verses from your magic book.

[Minimalist]

I'm going to have fun with the asshole for as long as he's here.

[Zen Badger]

I'ts even worse when they quote mine reputable scientists to make it appear that they are denying Evolution when they are in fact doing no such thing.

And the cretinist audience just swallows the lies whole and without question.

[theVOID]

The title of the thread is in fact a book, published in 1967. A small blue book 'refuting' evolution.
I began to read it and to my dismay, creationists arguements have not evolved at all! They are the same from 40 years ago! Should we expect any different? After all, they oppose evolution. If their arguements had evolved, they would be hypocrites! However, most creationists do believe in micro evolution and one can see they have micro evolved. From little blue books in the 60s to cool flash websites like Answers in Genesis...
Anyways, my point is, until, if ever, creationists have any convincing scientific arguements, all threads contending evolution should not be classified as science or in this part of the forum!

The Micro/Macro thing is a misnoma, there is no difference. It's one of those things like "kind" that have no scientific basis or working definition.

It's no surprise that their arguments are just as bad, evolution is just as much of a fact.