What Do You Think?

[ignoramus]

JRohan ... I'm starting to believe you are an innocent victim. I will not be rude to you again, I'm sorry.
If your priest has boxed you around the ring more times than Mike Tyson, please inform the authorities asap.

[chimp3]

[JROHAN]

You atheists tend to be so brainwashed you find it completely incomprehensible
that atheists like Richard Dawkins would ever openly lie.

YET, RICHARDS DAWKINS IS A LIAR!!!!

Dawkins blatantly states there is no scientific evidence for the afterlife
and stupid suckers like you atheist idiots here just blindly believe him

THAT IS A LIE!!

NOT ONLY IS THERE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR THE AFTERLIFE,

BUT A MILLION DOLLAR PRIZE AWAITS ((ANYONE)))

WHO CAN SUCCESSFULLY REFUTE IT!!!

JUST THINK HOW VALUABLE WINNING THAT PRIZE WOULD BE

TO SOMEONE LIKE RICHARD DAWKINS.

FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD, RICHARD DAWKINS

HASN'T EVEN BOTHERED TRYING TO WIN IT!!!

HE DOESN'T HAVE THE GUTS TO EVEN TRY!!!

http://victorzammit.com/skeptics/challenge.html



ONLY A SCAM ARTIST LIAR WOULD SAY

THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR THE AFTERLIFE

THE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IS MOUNTING!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_q...+AFTERLIFE

[chimp3]

The story about the fifty-something man being revived with a defibrillator is proof that he was not dead. A defibrillator is used to correct a fatal cardiac arrhythmia such as V-Fib. He still had a heart beat , just a very bad one to have. The heart is ineffective in delivering oxygenated blood to the brain. These NDE's always read like bad television emergency room scenes. They never get it right.

[Whateverist]

If there is no scientific evidence WHATSOEVER that gravity is the result of a

meaningless, random chance occurrence then 

the assumption

IS BASED ON BLIND FAITH, NOT ON SCIENCE!!!

To say that "gravity is the result of a meaningless, random chance occurrence" isn't a good observation. Science isn't in the business of making pronouncements. Rather, it is about investigating observed phenomenon and exploring testable hypotheses to delve into their causes. You can't observe or test "meaninglessness". Science is based on repeatable tests and observations. If gravity were thought to be a "random chance occurrence" there would be no point in studying it. But there is nothing iffy about it, it has been observed wherever tested. So I don't know where you get your information but the views you attribute to science are simply wrong.

[Amarok]

So his evidence is a story about a guy who didn't really die

And he's calling us unthinking

[Whateverist]

So his evidence is a story about a guy who didn't really die

And he's calling us unthinking

I know.  Boringly sophomoric and ineffective attempt at criticism.

[Amarok]

Oh and if he's going to try cases were the brain was found dead I remind all present

100 years ago no pulse or breath meant death but that proved wrong

50 years ago no heart beat meant death that was wrong too

Now it's brain scans but it's wholly possible that the death of the brain alone might not be enough to truly be dead. I of course don't man hocus pocus but biology .The body is still full of mysteries turning to mumbo jumbo is a sad substitute for REAL discovery

And yes he still acts like an unhinged 12 year old weather able to order from amazon and write emo poetry or not

[Crunchy]

I made a reply dealing with the logical fallacies of this persons initial argument. This was a mistake as I had not read through his disturbed hate filled posts that followed.
We are clearly dealing here with someone fixated on his inability to get everyone everywhere to agree with him and his feelings of impotence in this regard are fueling his rage.


While some theists may deserve a good thrashing in debate, I don't believe this is the case here. I don't think we should ever ban people for disagreeing with us but in this case pumping up the rage of a person who gives every indication of a fixation seems like it could lead to dangerous situations in the real world. We don't know what kind of violence this person is capable of inflicting on any of the "guilty" parties in his reach.  
IMO this person should be banned.

[Amarok]

I made a reply dealing with the logical fallacies of this persons initial argument. This was a mistake as I had not read through his disturbed hate filled posts that followed.
We are clearly dealing here with someone fixated on his inability to get everyone everywhere to agree with him and his feelings of impotence in this regard are fueling his rage.


While some theists may deserve a good thrashing in debate, I don't believe this is the case here. I don't think we should ever ban people for disagreeing with us but in this case pumping up the rage of a person who gives every indication of a fixation seems like it could lead to dangerous situations in the real world. We don't know what kind of violence this person is capable of inflicting on any of the "guilty" parties in his reach.  
IMO this person should be banned.

You may have  a point perhaps for his own good a ban is in order