|
Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
|
 RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 30, 2017 at 8:13 pm
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2017 at 8:13 pm by ignoramus.)
Probabilistically, yes/no.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. 
"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it." - Clint Eastwood
"My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive; and to do so with some passion, some compassion, some humor, and some style." - Maya Angelou "A physician without a knowledge of Astrology has no right to call himself a physician." - Hippocrates "Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. - Hippocrates "I always wanted to be somebody, but now I realize I should have been more specific." - Lily Tomlin  RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 2:35 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 2:45 am by emjay.)
 RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 3:31 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 3:40 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
Hmm. Let's see, you want an example of something perfect that exists in reality. Perfection by definition means without flaw. So what's a flaw? Hmm. A flaw can be something that causes deviation from perfection.
So you want an example of something that doesn't deviate from its perfect state. Essentially you want an example of something that doesn't "age", something that exists as it is. You want something that is not affected by space time but if something exist then it will be affected by space time. So you want an example of something that doesn't exist in reality and exist in reality because in order for something perfect to exist in reality it must not exist in reality. (After some thinking........) The answer is vacuum. It exists in reality but also doesn't exist in reality and is exempt from imperfection. Where's my prize? RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 3:45 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 3:47 am by ignoramus.)
Wrong!
Tell me which simple molecules have changed in 4 billion years? Water? Nup? (and heaps others). See, nature is the only thing that is perfect. We contain 70 water. We are all at least 70% perfect... Nice boobs, add 10%. Pretty, add another 10%, theist, deduct 10%, doesn't like bacon, deduct another 10%, hairy armpits, deduct 20%!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. (January 31, 2017 at 3:31 am)pool the great Wrote: Hmm. Let's see, you want an example of something perfect that exists in reality. Perfection by definition means without flaw. So what's a flaw? Hmm. A flaw can be something that causes deviation from perfection. From my point of view, nearly. Your prize  
"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it." - Clint Eastwood
"My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive; and to do so with some passion, some compassion, some humor, and some style." - Maya Angelou "A physician without a knowledge of Astrology has no right to call himself a physician." - Hippocrates "Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. - Hippocrates "I always wanted to be somebody, but now I realize I should have been more specific." - Lily Tomlin 
Will the vacuum also be receiving a prize? Might be a bit tricky at the awards ceremony.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 4:26 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 4:27 am by ignoramus.)
Vacuums and Gravity get all the awards ...The brown nosers know how to suck!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear. RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 4:39 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 4:43 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(January 31, 2017 at 3:45 am)ignoramus Wrote: Wrong! Okay. So let's consider water as perfect. What happens when you boil it, it turns to vapor - no longer perfect. Every molecule screw other molecules and make baby molecules. For some thing to be perfect it must exist as it is. (January 31, 2017 at 3:47 am)The Wise Joker Wrote:(January 31, 2017 at 3:31 am)pool the great Wrote: Hmm. Let's see, you want an example of something perfect that exists in reality. Perfection by definition means without flaw. So what's a flaw? Hmm. A flaw can be something that causes deviation from perfection. Hmm. So that's a bit confusing... So is that like the first prize or the ..second prize? I bet it's a first prize but I'll take a "second" prize if you don't want to hurt some poor chaps heart. Just make the air quotes when you give it to me (January 31, 2017 at 4:26 am)ignoramus Wrote: Vacuums and Gravity get all the awards ...The brown nosers know how to suck! Nope. Gravity can be high or low so it can't be perfect in that aspect. (January 31, 2017 at 4:39 am)pool the great Wrote:(January 31, 2017 at 3:45 am)ignoramus Wrote: Wrong! Water - changing form is not always a sign of imperfection. Prize - So close, yet so far away. Gravity - change in variation of strength is not always a sign of imperfection.
"I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it." - Clint Eastwood
"My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive; and to do so with some passion, some compassion, some humor, and some style." - Maya Angelou "A physician without a knowledge of Astrology has no right to call himself a physician." - Hippocrates "Science is the father of knowledge, but opinion breeds ignorance. - Hippocrates "I always wanted to be somebody, but now I realize I should have been more specific." - Lily Tomlin |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
