Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 10:30 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is it okay when God kills people?
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
Anything for jesus.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 10:18 am)SteveII Wrote: 1. Free will does not logically mean evil--just the potential. I believe that being in the actual presence of God makes any possible choice of evil impossible because of the situation not because of a logical impossibility.. I don't know though--just a theory developed to answer the question.

2. God is very much responsible for allowing us to choose (because without that ability, we cannot love anything--including him). Adam was punished, yes, but the real question was it worth creating him (including knowledge of his eventual fall and punishment)? I think it is clear that God would say yes to that. Adam would say yes to that (I certainly am glad of it personally). To flip it around, would you say it would have been better to be created without free will--which would include no ability to love? What would be the point? 

3. I don't think that's the case. When you don't take it/discuss it piecemeal, the basic doctrines fit together without much trouble.

1. How could the angels have rebelled if it were impossible to sin in god’s presence? Are you defining free will as something other than being able to make a choice? If we can’t make a choice in heaven, then by your own argument, we won’t be able to love.
2. If I have a child and offer that child certain freedoms, they would be according to what I feel he can handle at a given age. I wouldn’t give a three year old the same freedoms as an eighteen year old and then punish him severely when he chooses to do what I told him not to do. I’ve taken children through the terrible twos and teenage rebellion. I’ve never thought that deliberate disobedience on their part justified cruel and unusual punishment on my part.
3. Actually, the doctrines only seem logical when taken piece meal. It’s when I put them all together that they fall apart.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.

I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire

Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 7:31 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:
(May 18, 2017 at 10:18 am)SteveII Wrote: 1. Free will does not logically mean evil--just the potential. I believe that being in the actual presence of God makes any possible choice of evil impossible because of the situation not because of a logical impossibility.. I don't know though--just a theory developed to answer the question.

2. God is very much responsible for allowing us to choose (because without that ability, we cannot love anything--including him). Adam was punished, yes, but the real question was it worth creating him (including knowledge of his eventual fall and punishment)? I think it is clear that God would say yes to that. Adam would say yes to that (I certainly am glad of it personally). To flip it around, would you say it would have been better to be created without free will--which would include no ability to love? What would be the point? 

3. I don't think that's the case. When you don't take it/discuss it piecemeal, the basic doctrines fit together without much trouble.

1. How could the angels have rebelled if it were impossible to sin in god’s presence? Are you defining free will as something other than being able to make a choice?  If we can’t make a choice in heaven, then by your own argument, we won’t be able to love.
2. If I have a child and offer that child certain freedoms, they would be according to what I feel he can handle at a given age. I wouldn’t give a three year old the same freedoms as an eighteen year old and then punish him severely when he chooses to do what I told him not to do. I’ve taken children through the terrible twos and teenage rebellion. I’ve never thought that deliberate disobedience on their part justified cruel and unusual punishment on my part.
3. Actually, the doctrines only seem logical when taken piece meal. It’s when I put them all together that they fall apart.

1. Indeed kind of blows the whole free will defense away . Even if the condition is not itself alone enough the bear minimum of free will is making choices and yes the whole . So which is it are we robots in heaven or not?

2. Indeed treating small children by adult standards is bullshit . Same as punishing human by a gods standard.

3. Even taken piece mail it's a joke
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 5:03 pm)Khemikal Wrote: It would mean exactly what it does now.   I've never chosen to love a person in my life? Is that what your experience of love has been? That would be a neat trick.

If love was a matter of choice, my life would certainly be a hell of a lot simpler right now.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 12:32 pm)SteveII Wrote: Explain how in the world we could love someone without the ability to choose to love them. The word would have no meaning.

Love isn't going to change because our understanding of it changes.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 10:34 pm)Cyberman Wrote:
(May 18, 2017 at 5:03 pm)Khemikal Wrote: It would mean exactly what it does now.   I've never chosen to love a person in my life?  Is that what your experience of love has been?  That would be a neat trick.

If love was a matter of choice, my life would certainly be a hell of a lot simpler right now.

I guess I could choose to love someone, but then that wouldn't sound so natural ...
Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 12:32 pm)SteveII Wrote:
(May 18, 2017 at 12:23 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote: They aren't mutually exclusive.

Explain how in the world we could love someone without the ability to choose to love them. The word would have no meaning.

I have to admit, christians have redefined the word love to be unrecognizable, but I have never said, "Hey, I'll think I'll go over and fall in love with her".
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing."  - Samuel Porter Putnam
 
           

Reply
RE: Why is it okay when God kills people?
(May 18, 2017 at 7:31 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote:
(May 18, 2017 at 10:18 am)SteveII Wrote: 1. Free will does not logically mean evil--just the potential. I believe that being in the actual presence of God makes any possible choice of evil impossible because of the situation not because of a logical impossibility.. I don't know though--just a theory developed to answer the question.

2. God is very much responsible for allowing us to choose (because without that ability, we cannot love anything--including him). Adam was punished, yes, but the real question was it worth creating him (including knowledge of his eventual fall and punishment)? I think it is clear that God would say yes to that. Adam would say yes to that (I certainly am glad of it personally). To flip it around, would you say it would have been better to be created without free will--which would include no ability to love? What would be the point? 

3. I don't think that's the case. When you don't take it/discuss it piecemeal, the basic doctrines fit together without much trouble.

1. How could the angels have rebelled if it were impossible to sin in god’s presence? Are you defining free will as something other than being able to make a choice?  If we can’t make a choice in heaven, then by your own argument, we won’t be able to love.
2. If I have a child and offer that child certain freedoms, they would be according to what I feel he can handle at a given age. I wouldn’t give a three year old the same freedoms as an eighteen year old and then punish him severely when he chooses to do what I told him not to do. I’ve taken children through the terrible twos and teenage rebellion. I’ve never thought that deliberate disobedience on their part justified cruel and unusual punishment on my part.
3. Actually, the doctrines only seem logical when taken piece meal. It’s when I put them all together that they fall apart.

1. Why do you think Angels are in God's presence? Job 1:6ff give a different picture.

2. You are missing the whole point about what the disobedience did. God is holy and just (inseparably built into his nature) and couldn't continue the relationship in the same way as before. It was not like God decided to punish Adam, it was the natural consequences of the action. Analogies to children do not apply

3. Systematic theology take a lot of time to study and understand because there are hundreds of interrelated doctrines. Most Christians do not have a firm grasp on it.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The People of Light vs The People of Darkness Leonardo17 2 523 October 27, 2023 at 7:55 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Video #2 Why bad things happen to Good people. Drich 13 1639 January 6, 2020 at 11:05 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? vorlon13 92 8891 July 23, 2018 at 8:20 am
Last Post: SteveII
  Why, God? Why?! LadyForCamus 233 29067 June 5, 2018 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why don't we have people named Jesus? Alexmahone 28 5307 April 5, 2018 at 8:17 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Why did god allow people to be born after the fall ? possibletarian 367 63680 November 24, 2017 at 1:59 am
Last Post: possibletarian
Question Why do you people say there is no evidence,when you can't be bothered to look for it? Jaguar 74 20083 November 5, 2017 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: GUBU
  Why are Christians obsessed with Gay people? Cecelia 109 16948 January 29, 2017 at 1:37 am
Last Post: BrokenQuill92
  God said People who have Flat Noses Canot Serve Him Rhondazvous 177 20332 May 3, 2016 at 1:22 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Okay Girls.....Jesus Wants You to Fuck Like Bunnies Minimalist 133 25339 July 19, 2015 at 9:34 pm
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)