The WLB Again Ignored Trying To Take Melania's Hand

[Amarok]

You clearly did not read my previous comments it's not just the hand holding

Well if it's such a none issue stop commenting on it

I'm commenting on you guys making waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much over it. Sometimes your wife doesn't want to hold your hand. Big deal. Have you never had your significant other not want to hold your hand? Oh no! That's called the human experience. Stop reading too much into it. I did read your previous comments, I read the whole thread. You started out with the hand holding and then in your mind slowly started piling on, and then it ended with the normal trumpgasm that people have where they call him Satan, or crazy or Hitler (or in your case, worse then a blood thirsty dictator because they are nice to their wives.)

His wife didn't want to hold his hand. Big deal.

1 Not really I'm not making too much of it . It fits a wider pattern of behavior. And no my other and I always hold hands as well as my other other  

2. No you clearly did not read it all because as I said it fits a wider pattern of behavior . And nope I pointed out observations of Trumps behavior and how this fits I piled nothing on .

3. Pointing out that evil individuals are affectionate to there spouses . While Trump is not is troubling is not calling him worst  overall. It's saying that in this regard  worst .

But by all snarkly hand wave it as a Trumpgasm .

---

I'm  not saying that. What I'm saying is this is just further confirmation of Trumps dark traits and insecurities.

And I'm saying - I don't need any more confirmation, especially of the kind you see in glossy magazines for bored housewives. And anyone who does - either has not been paying attention, or won't be convinced by this.

I did say it was needed I said I FURTHER confirmation

But I will admit it's slightly more troubling in the sense that even most blood thirsty dictators are at least nice to there wives.

LOL... No, they're not. That's a ridiculous statement to make. And a completely unsupported one. Some may be nicer than others, but generally - psychopaths aren't nice to anyone and dictators are good at keeping their personal lives under wraps and their families in check.

You don't read much history do you ? Oh and I said blood thirsty dictator not all dictator a psychopaths.

This just demonstrates how far gone Trump is.

No, it doesn't, really. There are plenty of ordinary people, who have problems in their relationships - they don't have to be narcissistic, ego-maniacal, incompetent and fraudulent f*cknuts with authoritarian ambitions for that.

It does when added to everything else you yourself mentioned

[Minimalist]

Only the super important events of the world reported by rawstory, eh?

We can't all jerk off to Breitbart, can we?

[Amarok]

Only the super important events of the world reported by rawstory, eh?

We can't all jerk off to Breitbart, can we?

Yeah Brainfart the site that wrote a whole article about Obama liking poupon mustard proving he's a east coast elitist (insert conservative new speak)

[Homeless Nutter]

[...]

Learn to quote, please. You're making a mess of this conversation. You're putting too many quotes inside other quotes and you put your own responses within mine. At this point I can't even quote you without doing a whole bunch of editing.

I did say it was needed I said I FURTHER confirmation

Read this sentence again and tell me it makes any logical sense... You did say it was needed? Or you didn't? (You definitely said it matters - and I'm saying it doesn't at this point). What does "I FURTHER confirmation" mean? Maybe you need to cool down, take your time and try to respond less angrily? Just a suggestion...

You don't read much history do you ?  

LOL... Is this supposed to be an argument? If you're going to take a shot at my knowledge of history - it would help if you provided some actual examples to illustrate your point. Unless you just wanted to come across as a smug, condescending twat, in which case - please, do carry on...

Oh and I said blood thirsty dictator not all dictator a psychopaths.

No, of course - thirst for blood is something exhibited by completely "normal" people...  
And what does that matter, how a dictator treats their family, if they're a murderer? Does it make them somehow "better", or more relatable in your eyes?

An actual "blood-thirsty" dictator most likely wouldn't allow their spouse to snub them in public - it would show "weakness" in the eyes of their subordinates. So the fact, that Melania can show her contempt for her husband in public, without fear of punishment could very well be interpreted in favor of the orange muppet and the way he treats his family - if you really want to speculate on this kind of nonsense.

It does when added to everything else you yourself mentioned

Nope, it does not. Everything I mentioned is enough to disqualify Drumpf as a decent human being. Anything on top of that - especially if it's some grade-school level gossip, about "holding hands" - that's just redundant, unnecessary and in fact presents his opposition as petty gossipers, grasping at straws, which undermines the whole effort.

[Mystical]

I disagree how someone treats there spouse. I think says a great deal about there  character. And character says a great deal about  leadership .

And Trump from all I see fails in all three.

Maybe. But do you really know how he treats his spouse?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/...te-9688745

Yep. I cant imagine he gets more chivalrous in private.

Also I wasn't joking. His ex wife Ivanka wrote in her book how he came home mad about his hair surgeon who she had referred him to, and he ripped her her hair out in chunks during a sexual assault that she was later forced to put a foreword in her book that it wasn't rape per se, she jus felt raped. 

But hey I'm sure he's a better guy now that he's got alll the power in the world, eh? 

[CapnAwesome]

Only the super important events of the world reported by rawstory, eh?

We can't all jerk off to Breitbart, can we?

Don't know what you jerk off to and don't want to know. I read a variety of news from a variety of sources. It's the only way to have an informed opinion. Reporting that the first lady didn't hold the presidents hand, twice! That's as unimportant and stupid as news gets.

---

We can't all jerk off to Breitbart, can we?

Yeah Brainfart the site that wrote a whole article about Obama liking poupon mustard proving he's a east coast elitist (insert conservative new speak)

That's an equally stupid story. They are both extremely stupid and irrelevant stories. Why is it that you can see it with Brietbart, but not with this pile of garbage that passes for journalism? Also I read all your posts, so stop saying that. I just reject your conclusion based on hand holding, or that not holding hands for two seconds (actually Trump was the one trying to hold her hand) is indicative of anything, regardless of other behavior. Could it be that you just don't like Trump, so you see everything that he does (or in this case, the first lady does) as indicative of a deeper evil? Seems more likely.

[Seraphina]

I wouldn't make a decision on who to vote for based on whether or not their spouse will hold their hand in public.

But considering this is someone who bragged about how big his dick is during one of the presidential debates - I had a moment of schadenfreude when I saw the video of Melania rejecting his hand.

-Teresa

[Mystical]

I agree with someone above-- Cap'n, if all your "opinion" is going to be is a constant whine fest about why this thread exists in the first place, then why bother? If people want to speculate about public info known about someone famous-- much less the highly controversial President of the United States whose under investigation by the FBI--and your opinion is, "This isn't worth talking about," then seriously. How do you say.. "Sod off!"