RE: What are your thoughts on fat acceptance?
June 4, 2017 at 7:31 am
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2017 at 7:45 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(June 4, 2017 at 7:21 am)Isis Wrote: My argument about banning junk food from being eaten in pubs wasn't entirely serious
Oh. Lol. Well in that case I can actually buy the argument Paulpablo made about junk food causing the NHS to get clogged up with obesity-related problems. In that case I think junk food should be taxed but far far less than cigarettes. Because not only do cigarettes also cause problems that clog up the NHS but it's also far far more addictive than junk food and it damages people in the area who don't even wish to smoke. And it doesn't have low nutrition, it has zero nutrition. It's a poison not a food. Even alcohol has more nutrition than smoke. And alcohol is terrible at quenching one's thirst if oneself is thirsty but it certainly does a better job than not hydrating at all. Whereas all smoking does is damage a person and cause them to get addicted to continue doing it... and damages others around too.
So I think cigarettes should still be taxed and perhaps junk food should be taxed at a much lower rate. I think cigarettes should still be either banned from all pubs or there should be smokers pubs. I don't think junk food should be banned from pubs.
Sorry for so much vitriol. You know I consider you a friend. I sometimes get passionately disagreeable like this when I disagree about something and I'm passionate about my opinions. I just think everyone should do whatever they want to their bodies as long as they're not harming anyone else and smokers very much harm other people around them but obese people don't.
(June 4, 2017 at 7:11 am)paulpablo Wrote: I know an obese woman who's been told by her doctors she will be in a wheel chair soon if she doesn't lose weight and she says she's willing to do anything to not get to that point but she's lying about that because she's still eating so much bread, bacon, chrisps and McDonald's and so on.
It doesn't mean she's lying. She can be perfectly honest about being willing to do anything but then struggle to will those things or control her urges or impulses.
If she told her doctor that she was cutting out all the junk food then she'd either be lying or deluded. But even then it wouldn't be a lie if she said it before she tried. That could just be her failing to keep her word... which isn't a lie it's a broken promise.
If she told her doctor she was going to cut down on junk food and then she started eating junk food and then she went and told her doctor she'd cut it out completely when she hadn't... that would be either an outright lie, a delusion or a failure of memory.
Then there's also the case that a lot of obese people only count some of the things they eat... it's like a confirmation bias thing. They excuse themselves... if they lie in that case they're lying to themselves but not necessarily to anyone else. And I don't think 'lying to oneself' is actually lying. I think it's possible to deceive yourself indirectly and that is known as 'lying to oneself'. But actual lying is very direct and it's simply stating things you don't believe. I don't think it's even logically possible to directly tell yourself something you don't believe and at the same time be directly deceived by it because that would require telling yourself things you don't believe and then believing it. Which is a contradiction.
I think it's possible to lie to yourself through omission. By not telling yourself things that you do believe in such a way that you forget about what you believe and you temporarily lose those beliefs... but that's very hard to do if you do believe it (it's hard to forget what you believe)...and then your mind will still drift and think about those things even if you don't want it to. And then you'll remember the truth.