This is where we've come?
June 4, 2017 at 12:16 pm
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2017 at 12:18 pm by Lek.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 27, 2024, 4:14 pm
Thread Rating:
This is where we've come?
|
What the fuck are you on about now, Lek?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
RE: This is where we've come?
June 4, 2017 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2017 at 12:19 pm by Silver.)
Oh, there's the link.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
as long as they aren't shaving their legs . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Ahh. Ok.
About what I'd expect from the small minds of bigots.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
I'm usually in favor of more skin.
The pastels are probably more off putting than the fabric itself. Bold colors guys! And don't be afraid of charcoal, black, medium grey, navy blue . . . The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
I think it's ugly, but if a dude likes it, eeeeey, go for it! I wouldn't like it on a woman, either.
Not liking it does not equal intolerance.
"Hipster is what happens when young hot people do what old ladies do." -Exian
Meh, if I can deal with men wearing assless leather chaps, this is no big deal.
(June 4, 2017 at 12:16 pm)Lek Wrote: Makes me want to barf. Don't wear one. Also...stop frantically searching the Internet for extraneous bullshit to be disgusted/outraged about. That should help. RE: This is where we've come?
June 4, 2017 at 12:44 pm
(This post was last modified: June 4, 2017 at 12:44 pm by SteelCurtain.)
I did receive the newsletter. All card carrying liberals are meant to harass and deride anyone seen/heard saying that these shorts are not beautiful.
On a serious note, I actually read this clickbait garbage, and here is what counts as being 'slammed' as intolerant. Allure Wrote:We have a long way to go when it comes to fully embracing the shift in what men’s and women’s clothing looks like. … Newsflash: Fashion is about personal choice, and there’s NOTHING wrong with men choosing what they choose. The fact that people are actually upset by this (and still using the phrase ‘real man’) proves that we definitely have a lot of thinking to do about our perceptions of which clothes are ‘appropriate’ for people of any gender,”-or- Bustle Wrote:“All of this begs a question: What are we really reacting to here? If I had to guess, it’s more nuanced than how we feel about male versions of trends ‘for’ women, like RompHim. It’s not delight or concern at the fact that men are co-opting a trend typically worn by women—it’s discomfort and slack-jawed wonder that the details of the clothing are bright and lacy and stereotypically feminine AF, and being worn by men. … For me, it says a lot about our comfort level with actual gender fluidity in fashion,”-or- :gasp: Clickbait Rag Wrote:Teen Vogue—which has become increasingly activist about gender and sexual identity—said there was nothing wrong with the look, then groaned about the “very nasty” social-media users who considered them unmanly. You'll notice that the only time the word 'intolerant' was used was---you guessed it---by the writers of this clickbait article. Worked on Lek, it seems.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<--- |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)