Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 27, 2026, 1:57 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
#1
Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
What if police and court go by Theist logic and tell them, but you can't prove that you didn't do the crime.

"Not witnessing the crime doesn't mean you weren't the one doing it."

That's just hypothetical of course, because every rational person knows that this kind of reasoning is retarded.
Reply
#2
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
That's not the problem. They think they HAVE evidence when it's really not. That's not the same, in their minds, as having no evidence.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
#3
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 9, 2017 at 9:43 pm)Astonished Wrote: That's not the problem. They think they HAVE evidence when it's really not. That's not the same, in their minds, as having no evidence.
Police has evidence that the victim ate your sandwich without permission, so it is only logical that you shot him. At least police has an answer, right?
Reply
#4
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
In the Mormon orbit, just having a dream about Joseph Smith and the golden plates was deemed to be evidence.
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#5
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 9, 2017 at 9:30 pm)Vast Vision Wrote: What if police and court go by Theist logic and tell them, but you can't prove that you didn't do the crime.

"Not witnessing the crime doesn't mean you weren't the one doing it."

That's just hypothetical of course, because every rational person knows that this kind of reasoning is retarded.


I don't see how these two things are connected. Are you asking what would it be like if the burden of proof lies in the hands of the defense instead of the prosecution?
Reply
#6
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
[Image: logica.jpg]
Reply
#7
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 9, 2017 at 10:42 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: In the Mormon orbit, just having a dream about Joseph Smith and the golden plates was deemed to be evidence.

Uh.... didn't Joseph Smith have a dream that the golden plates were buried in his yard? ... And isn't the Book of Mormon written in English? By virtue of the fact that the Book of Mormon exists in English, we have solid, tangible proof that I can physically show you that the plates were indeed buried in Joseph Smith's backyard and that Joseph Smith translated them to English. Twice!

Checkmate, atheists!
Reply
#8
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 10, 2017 at 1:25 am)Aliza Wrote:
(July 9, 2017 at 10:42 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: In the Mormon orbit, just having a dream about Joseph Smith and the golden plates was deemed to be evidence.

Uh.... didn't Joseph Smith have a dream that the golden plates were buried in his yard? ... And isn't the Book of Mormon written in English? By virtue of the fact that the Book of Mormon exists in English, we have solid, tangible proof that I can physically show you that the plates were indeed buried in Joseph Smith's backyard and that Joseph Smith translated them to English. Twice!

Checkmate, atheists!

No, he only SAID he had a dream about golden plates buried on his property. Hearsay and conjecture.

Theist response: Then how else did he come by the knowledge of the plates being buried there and to go looking for them?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply
#9
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 10, 2017 at 1:29 am)Astonished Wrote:
(July 10, 2017 at 1:25 am)Aliza Wrote: Uh.... didn't Joseph Smith have a dream that the golden plates were buried in his yard? ... And isn't the Book of Mormon written in English? By virtue of the fact that the Book of Mormon exists in English, we have solid, tangible proof that I can physically show you that the plates were indeed buried in Joseph Smith's backyard and that Joseph Smith translated them to English. Twice!

Checkmate, atheists!

No, he only SAID he had a dream about golden plates buried on his property. Hearsay and conjecture.

Theist response: Then how else did he come by the knowledge of the plates being buried there and to go looking for them?

Yes.... Isn't that what I just said? I'm confused. Was my sarcasm not very clear in my post?  Confused
Reply
#10
RE: Should Theists have the burden of proof at the police and court?
(July 10, 2017 at 1:33 am)Aliza Wrote:
(July 10, 2017 at 1:29 am)Astonished Wrote: No, he only SAID he had a dream about golden plates buried on his property. Hearsay and conjecture.

Theist response: Then how else did he come by the knowledge of the plates being buried there and to go looking for them?

Yes.... Isn't that what I just said? I'm confused. Was my sarcasm not very clear in my post?  Confused

I'm making fun of pedantry and also satirizing the argument from ignorance. It wasn't intended to diminish yours, merely work off of it to deliver an even more spectacular blow (only not using sarcasm, but satire).
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Theists, provide your arguments for God. Disagreeable 41 10237 August 9, 2024 at 12:22 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Serious question about thoughts on theists Kingpin 118 29227 May 18, 2023 at 2:44 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Theists: What is your stance on evolution? Agnostic1 118 29208 March 27, 2022 at 8:48 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 25886 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: awty
  Theists, tell me, an atheist, why your God has neglected to show himself to me? ignoramus 75 39254 March 5, 2021 at 6:49 am
Last Post: awty
  If artificial super intelligence erases humans, will theists see this as God's plan? Face2face 24 10320 March 5, 2021 at 6:40 am
Last Post: awty
  Am I right to assume, that theists cannot prove that I am not god? Vast Vision 116 59205 March 5, 2021 at 6:39 am
Last Post: awty
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 3832 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: awty
  Theists: how do you account for psychopaths? robvalue 288 88612 March 5, 2021 at 6:37 am
Last Post: awty
  Theists: What do you mean when you say that God is 'perfect'? Angrboda 103 39852 March 5, 2021 at 6:35 am
Last Post: awty



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)