God and the dilemma with unfalsifiability

[Astonished]

Proven? Wow, let's see the research. What did they have to say about identical twins?

Well since you're so retarded you've resorted to shifting the burden of proof about the existence of your bullshit god, your judgment about what sources to trust is obviously suspect as I made an educated guess before in assuming and you've just proven it was a good assumption. Show me a reputable peer-reviewed journal article not generated by a biased religious-agenda-driven 'scientist' to prove that homosexuality and other gender identifying categories are all 100% a choice; until then, I'm going by the reasonable assumption that every single non-cis-gendered person on the planet is genuinely predisposed to that rather than consciously making a choice that will inevitably bring down on them so much bigoted intolerance that pieces of trash like you are responsible for. Makes me wonder how you'll treat any of your kids if one of them turns out to be an alternate orientation and you're confronted with the hard fucking truth that your piece of shit fuckass bastard god creates people a certain way and condemns them for it.

[John V]

Well since you're so retarded you've resorted to shifting the burden of proof about the existence of your bullshit god, your judgment about what sources to trust is obviously suspect as I made an educated guess before in assuming and you've just proven it was a good assumption.

Why are you so angry?

Show me a reputable peer-reviewed journal article not generated by a biased religious-agenda-driven 'scientist' to prove that homosexuality and other gender identifying categories are all 100% a choice; until then, I'm going by the reasonable assumption that every single non-cis-gendered person on the planet is genuinely predisposed to that rather than consciously making a choice that will inevitably bring down on them so much bigoted intolerance that pieces of trash like you are responsible for.

I haven't said it's 100% a choice. The reasonable conclusion from twins studies is that some people are born with a predisposition to be gay or trans at birth, but the predisposition is relatively small and falls far short of supporting the position that people are born gay.

And for women, longitudinal studies show that change of orientation is not uncommon. For them, conscious choice does seem to be a significant factor.

The born gay paradigm was a political tool. People, including many atheists, accepted gays' non-falsifiable claim.

Accepting non-falsifiable claims is a human thing, not a theist thing.

Another example is harm from religion. There's no way to quantify the good and harm done by religion, but atheists claim that it's a net harm anyway.

[Neo-Scholastic]

Dont both with astonished. I'm advising all the theists to put him on ignore.

[Astonished]

Well since you're so retarded you've resorted to shifting the burden of proof about the existence of your bullshit god, your judgment about what sources to trust is obviously suspect as I made an educated guess before in assuming and you've just proven it was a good assumption.

Why are you so angry?

Show me a reputable peer-reviewed journal article not generated by a biased religious-agenda-driven 'scientist' to prove that homosexuality and other gender identifying categories are all 100% a choice; until then, I'm going by the reasonable assumption that every single non-cis-gendered person on the planet is genuinely predisposed to that rather than consciously making a choice that will inevitably bring down on them so much bigoted intolerance that pieces of trash like you are responsible for.

I haven't said it's 100% a choice. The reasonable conclusion from twins studies is that some people are born with a predisposition to be gay or trans at birth, but the predisposition is relatively small and falls far short of supporting the position that people are born gay.

And for women, longitudinal studies show that change of orientation is not uncommon. For them, conscious choice does seem to be a significant factor.

The born gay paradigm was a political tool. People, including many atheists, accepted gays' non-falsifiable claim.

Accepting non-falsifiable claims is a human thing, not a theist thing.

Another example is harm from religion. There's no way to quantify the good and harm done by religion, but atheists claim that it's a net harm anyway.

I'm angry because you're an intolerant bigot who's full of shit pretending you know things you don't and give no fucks about how badly it hurts anyone. Pretty simple. Why is it theists seem to have such a difficult time grasping this concept? Must be because of the damage their dogma does to their empathy.

[emjay]

The forums need an ignore function, not just for posts, so we don't have to see obscene thread titles by desprate commie sodomites.

I didn't think you'd use words like that... sodomite... I thought you were above that. Just saying I've never thought of you as a bigot... until now.

[Astonished]

The forums need an ignore function, not just for posts, so we don't have to see obscene thread titles by desprate commie sodomites.

I didn't think you'd use words like that... sodomite... I thought you were above that. Just saying I've never thought of you as a bigot... until now.

Well, the stupid little cunt just told me he was putting me on ignore for 'not contributing' to any discussion. Amazing projection of theistic inadequacy onto others around here, but what else is new? Bigot is about the nicest thing you could say about him.

If it's within the power of a creator deity to communicate with its creation directly and correct any misconceptions about its character or desires, and it does not, there are three options for why this is, and none of them are good (for the theists' side). Either the god does not care, is malevolent and wishes to watch us butcher each other over rival interpretations of it (none of which come close), or the thing doesn't exist and never did. No 'good' god is compatible with this lack of attention. Completely inexcusable and unanswerable. To cling to this god concept while fully aware of this is to admit one's own utter dishonesty.

[Little Rik]

Well since you're so retarded you've resorted to shifting the burden of proof about the existence of your bullshit god, your judgment about what sources to trust is obviously suspect as I made an educated guess before in assuming and you've just proven it was a good assumption.

Why are you so angry?

The poor guy is sick.
Some nuts in his brain don't work anymore.
He need help and a lot of that.  

[Astonished]

Amazing projection of one's own faults from the mouths of theists...I should just put that in my signature so I don't have to type it after every theist reply.

[Neo-Scholastic]

The forums need an ignore function, not just for posts, so we don't have to see obscene thread titles by desprate commie sodomites.

I didn't think you'd use words like that... sodomite... I thought you were above that. Just saying I've never thought of you as a bigot... until now.

Sodomite is simply someone who engages in sodomy, i.e. buttsex, including heterosexuals. I've been repeated told that not all gays enjoy or engage in anal, therefore to be called a sodomite is not a homosexual slur, BY THEIR OWN DEFINITION. And if you want to look at the origin of the word and the actual biblical text, the sins of Sodom extended far beyond attempting to gang rape a couple of angels. BTW it also includes adultery and all other kinds of "uncleanliness" and perverted behaviors.

[Little Rik]

Amazing projection of one's own faults from the mouths of theists...I should just put that in my signature so I don't have to type it after every theist reply.

Look brother, if you need help all you have to do is ask for.
I know few very good psychiatrists that can help you to sort out your mental problems.
Just ask for.
And please don't do any harm to yourself, we all like you.
Please.