Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[Edwardo Piet]

He's just a single-page, idiotic script playing in an endless loop.

Hmmm. He sounds distinctly like my balls.

[Succubus]

After I read the first 8 pages of the thread I realized that "believe and do not doubt" is the smartest safety triger concieved.

But does it work? Apply your strategy to the Easter bunny, for example, what must we conclude?

[notimportant1234]

It concludes that you should not bother yourself with that.
You believe it ,good.
You don't believe it ,good.
Make the choice and move on .

[causal code]

Science is the study of what we understand and can duplicate. true but science is also an excersice in faith. (theories based on theories based on evidence that may or may not support anything theorized to date.

The reason science and faith have been separated is because 'scientists' Simply WANT to feel more legit than those of "common faith in God." But in the end scientific origins like any YEC version of origins is a demonstration in the same core faith.

Drich, bro isn't it time to upgrade your religion?

Don't you realize that archaic science/religion was upgraded into modern science centuries ago?



Why did I upgraded my religion... to atheism?

Consider the following:

Modern science is used to build your phones, internet, cars, planes, supermarket items, hospitals, homes, buses, pharmaceutical goods, etc.

Modern science was once archaic science. (See reference {A}).

However, religion/myth was removed from modern science, when archaic science became modern science in the scientific revolution. (See reference {B})

An example is when astrology/myth was removed from/modern science. (See reference {C})

Question:

If religion/myth was supposedly useful/not worthless, why was it removed from modern science?

Quick references:

{A} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of..._antiquity

{B} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_revolution

{C} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_astronomy

[Edwardo Piet]

Just look how photorealistic this 4k game scene is (unreal engine 4)... can we create simulations with sentient software?

Meh. Id software has better player movement.

[Amarok]

.It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite...

[Cyberman]

Now we have to silence him.

Unfortunate.

[Crossless2.0]

He's just a single-page, idiotic script playing in an endless loop.

Hmmm. He sounds distinctly like my balls.

What? Abused and overworked?

[I_am_not_mafia]

.It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite...

What Drich doesn't realise it that if scientists don't find what they are looking for then they don't have anything to publish. That's not the same as saying that scientists always find what they are funded to find. Most scientific research involves far more failed experiments than successful ones.

If a scientist tries to replicate the findings of another scientist and fails, then it's worthwhile writing up and publishing if they can demonstrate that it was not because of a mistake that they made.

[Fake Messiah]

Consider the following:

Modern science is used to build your phones, internet, cars, planes, supermarket items, hospitals, homes, buses, pharmaceutical goods, etc.

Modern science was once archaic science. (See reference {A}).

However, religion/myth was removed from modern science, when archaic science became modern science in the scientific revolution. (See reference {B})

An example is when astrology/myth was removed from/modern science. (See reference {C})

Well yeah these fanatical ignoramuses seem to repeat "how science changes" because they're just parroting lies they heard. The truth is that fundamental notion of matter and material processes has not been changed since the time of Newton which was over 300 hundred years ago. Newtonian mechanics is hardly useless today in 21 century in fact F=m×a still gets you to Mars and other places in the solar system. If these people were educated in schools instead of their homes and churches they would see that Newtonian physics is still what most students learn in physics classes and if they had actual jobs they would see it is what most engineers and others use when they apply physics in their professions.

So if they are really concerned to stay with the sturdy things they should stick to science unlike religion which only in Christianity changes on whims of their authorities. I mean like this one where characters in Monty Python discuss some of the unbridgeable gaps between Catholics and Protestants





Or take Anglicans like John Tillotson, Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop Edward Stillingfleet who ridiculed Catholicism like the central doctrine doctrine which claims that the bread and wine used in the communion ceremony is changed in substance so that what is bread and wine to all the senses is really the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Christ. They said that it was an idiotic doctrine because if it looks like bread, smells like bread, tastes like bread, then it is bread. To them to believe otherwise is to give up the basis for all knowledge based on sense experience.