Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 16, 2022, 11:16 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Discussion, not Provocation
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
Never tried it. I think I could be up for anything in a sexy situation. Are you volunteering? Tongue
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(November 11, 2017 at 10:24 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Never tried it. I think I could be up for anything in a sexy situation.

Even scat?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
Almost anything.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(November 11, 2017 at 1:01 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: thinking about it makes me gayer . . .

Tongue

You're about as gay as gay can get already
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 11:28 am)Tiberius Wrote: 2. Be accurate. Check your sources before posting, ensure that you have the facts. If you are presenting someone else's opinion, use quotes and don't editorialize what they are saying unless you make it clear that this is your interpretation rather than what they have said specifically.

There go all the threads made by religious folk!! Tongue

As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.

Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!) 

My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!! Tongue

As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.

Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!) 

My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.

How about an introduction thread?

Necroing posts is generally frowned upon.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote: My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.

Oddly, I don't see any reports from you for these alleged violations.
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
Maybe he just admitted that he's a sock.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!! Tongue

As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.

Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!) 

My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.

Interesting.... I don't remember those threads.
Care to link to them?
Reply
RE: Discussion, not Provocation
(February 7, 2018 at 10:15 am)AgnosticHuman Wrote:
(November 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm)pocaracas Wrote: There go all the threads made by religious folk!! Tongue

As part of the new "Prime Directive" rule, we are moving to remove and/or shut down threads which serve no purpose but to be provocative and troll people. We live in times where people spend too much time shouting at each other and spreading misinformation about each other, rather than sitting down and having a good discussion about their views. At AF, we want to facilitate the latter and not the former.

Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard et al . . . all started by religious folk. (!!) 

My first experience, trying to learn the rules and interaction policies is seeing them violated as a matter of an individual course.

For starters you could learn the difference between a post and a thread.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Future of the Forums (Discussion) Tiberius 130 11648 May 6, 2020 at 9:47 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)