Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 5, 2024, 12:18 am

Poll: What is your stance?
This poll is closed.
I do not believe that god(s) exist.
64.15%
34 64.15%
I believe that god(s) do not exist.
24.53%
13 24.53%
I believe that god(s) exist.
11.32%
6 11.32%
Total 53 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Belief
#51
RE: Belief
(November 29, 2010 at 6:19 pm)theVOID Wrote: That's not at all what he said... he was responding to the arguments against God from a Christian theological perspective.
Oh really? Strange. This wouldn't be the first time where I've completely misinterpreted him, either that or just I'm too tired or bored of magic man to debate today...
Reply
#52
RE: Belief
(November 23, 2010 at 12:27 am)Arcanus Wrote:




1. Humans have developed a vivid imagination.

2. Many fictional characters have been created by human imagination, e.g. leprechauns, fairies, dragons, god(s), etc.

3. Therefore, no deity exists, except in the realm of human imagination.

"If there are gaps they are in our knowledge, not in things themselves." Chapman Cohen

"Shit-apples don't fall far from the shit-tree, Randy." Mr. Lahey
Reply
#53
RE: Belief
(November 30, 2010 at 5:16 am)Arcanus Wrote: If you would like to try, I am willing to show you why that fails to rescue such arguments. At this point I am unable to envision what sort of argument you are thinking of.
? I think the arguments are well trodden and aired, we may take different and competing views of which carry more force. My point is that the so called, defeaters such as the free will defence, do not give a knock out blow to arguments for atheism such as evil and reasonable unbelief (divine hiddenness).

(November 30, 2010 at 5:16 am)Arcanus Wrote: Saying that it is wrong and a problem remains for the theist does not help me see it. Furthermore, there is no such thing as "redefining" free-will; such a statement presupposes a universal and objective definition of free-will from which others deviate and shoulders an enormous burden of proof. I do not redefine free-will; I have a definition that competes with others.
Having said that, I struggle to think of any definition of free-will under which my statement fails. Whether libertarianism, determinism, or compatibilism, my statement holds. Can you show me otherwise? In pursuit of accuracy, my statement again was, "Informing a person of what his choices are and the consequences thereof does not negate his ability to freely choose according to his desires."
I find this a very theoretical rejoinder. Sure if a god was to say "if you take one more step you'll fall over a cliff" does not in any sense undermine free will as it is just "Informing a person of what his choices are and the consequences thereof does not negate his ability to freely choose according to his desires."
Lets stop talking for a second about the philosophical god and talk about the Christian god, who clearly threatens people if they do not do as they are told. What is free about this choice if you a) beleive it and b) you beleive that god can do anything they want to you or others? It is coersion and duress at best and bullying at risk of eternal torture at worst. It is not free will by any common definition I am aware of. Worship is by definition and abondment of your autonomy and ultimately free will.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
Reply
#54
RE: Belief
Just because you feel duress at the information presented doens't mean it's any more of an act of bullying or coersion, then an informative lesson. Last I recall Arcanus and I are both Christians and I can't speak for him, but I believe that God's intent is not to interfere with free will, but to inform. You obviously have a differing opinion so please site refernece and a framework for your logic.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
#55
RE: Belief
(December 1, 2010 at 8:00 am)Strongbad Wrote: 1. Humans have developed a vivid imagination.
2. Many fictional characters have been created by human imagination, e.g. leprechauns, fairies, dragons, god(s), etc.
3. Therefore, no deity exists, except in the realm of human imagination.

An argument that assumes gods are products of human imagination in order to conclude that gods are products of human imagination is a viciously circular epic fail.




(December 4, 2010 at 5:50 am)Captain Scarlet Wrote: My point is that so-called defeaters, such as the free-will defense, do not give a knockout blow to arguments for atheism such as evil and reasonable unbelief (divine hiddenness).

The only arguments for atheism such defeaters knockout are the logical forms thereof, which are intended to demonstrate a contradiction. If there is no logical contradiction, then such arguments are defeated (e.g., if God has a morally sufficient reason for X, then X no longer demonstrates a contradiction and the argument is dead). To maintain the argument, the atheist would have to show that God having a morally sufficient reason for X itself involves a contradiction. The logical Problem of Evil and other such arguments are exercises in futility that since the 70s and 80s (Smith, Mackie, etc.) few atheist philosophers waste time on.

Captain Scarlet Wrote:Let's stop talking for a second about the philosophical [concept of] god and talk about the Christian God, who clearly threatens people if they do not do as they are told.

First, the God of Christianity is the only one I contend for in my arguments anyway, regardless of whether others are using generic deity or not. Second, God does not threaten anybody, if 'threat' means an act of coercion (which you indicated as your meaning); it carries the implication of forcing someone against their will into this or that action, which is inapplicable here because God does not force anyone into anything. It is more akin to your cliff analogy, wherein God says, "You can do X, which results in P, or not, which results in Q." You can now make an informed choice, knowing what this or that choice results in. Taking umbrage to some consequence does not equate to the loss of free-will. Third, the very notion of God forcing someone against their will is utterly meaningless (it presupposes a will capable of resisting God, which is question-begging vis-à-vis omnipotence and omniscience).

Captain Scarlet Wrote:Worship is by definition an abandonment of your autonomy and ultimately free will.

The abandonment of your autonomy assumes you had it to begin with, which is question-begging vis-à-vis a God who is sovereign over his creation. You can assume what you like, of course, but belief P (God's sovereignty) is not refuted by the mere existence of ~P belief y (human autonomy).
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)
Reply
#56
RE: Belief
1.If god the creator exists, he is perfect i.e. a state of completeness and flawlessness.

2.A perfect creator god by definition does not want or need to create anything else.

3.Therefore god the creator does not exist.
Reply
#57
RE: Belief
1. I look at a blank wall and wish a door were there.

2. There is no door.

3. Therefore, god does not exist.
Reply
#58
RE: Belief
^Good one.

1.God is depicted as an old man who wants to love us.

2.I don't want to be loved by a cosmic perverted senior citizen, I prefer spaghetti. FSM Grin

3.Therefore god does not exist.

XD

1.Christ said Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

2.I can't eat words.

3.Therefore god does not exist.
Reply
#59
RE: Belief
Jokey ones now (i.e. not in need of legitimate responses but I can't resist):

1. God is the cake.
2. The cake is a lie.
3. Therefore, God is a lie.

1. The sentence below is true.
2. The sentence above is false.
3. Therefore, there is no God.

And on to the less jokey...

1. In Christianity/Islam/Judaism, humans were made in the image and likeness of the Abrahamic God.
2. Humans do not have an intuitive understanding of the mechanisms through which the universe operates.
3. Therefore, it is illogical to presume that the Abrahamic God is the creator and maintainer of said universe.

1. Yahweh's origins date back to the flood of the Euphrates ca. 2900 BCE, when he was then known by the name Enlil (though he is more often compared to Enki/Ea).
2. Enlil/Yahweh belonged to a pantheon of deities.
3. Therefore, the likelihood of Yahweh/Enlil's existence is equiprobable to the likelihood of the existence of all of the deities belonging to this pantheon.
"Faith is about taking a comforting, childlike view of a disturbing and complicated world." ~ Edward Current

[Image: Invisible_Pink_Unicorn_by_stampystampy.gif] [Image: 91b7ba0967f80c8c43c58fdf3fa0571a.gif] [Image: Secular_Humanist_by_MaruLovesStamps.gif]
Reply
#60
RE: Belief
Quote:Lethe' pid='108261' dateline='1291568241'
Jokey ones now (i.e. not in need of legitimate responses but I can't resist):

1. God is the cake.
2. The cake is a lie.
3. Therefore, God is a lie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dgmgub8mHw

Smile




The world is a dangerous place to live - not because of the people who are evil but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
- Albert Einstein
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How do I deal with the belief that maybe... Just maybe... God exists and I'm... Gentle_Idiot 75 8744 November 23, 2022 at 5:34 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Belief in God is a clinic Interaktive 55 7578 April 1, 2019 at 10:55 pm
Last Post: LostLocke
  Is atheism a belief? Agnostico 1023 107313 March 16, 2019 at 1:42 pm
Last Post: Catharsis
  Do you know that homeopathy doesn't work, or do you just lack belief that it does? I_am_not_mafia 24 6175 August 25, 2018 at 4:34 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Why don't some people understand lack of belief? Der/die AtheistIn 125 25829 April 20, 2018 at 7:15 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Objective morality as a proper basic belief Little Henry 609 180671 July 29, 2017 at 1:02 am
Last Post: Astonished
  A loose “theory” of the dynamics of religious belief Bunburryist 6 1850 August 14, 2016 at 2:14 pm
Last Post: Bunburryist
  Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three) Little Rik 3049 451638 April 11, 2016 at 8:38 am
Last Post: Little Rik
  Is Lack of Belief the Best You Can Do? Neo-Scholastic 259 44123 April 3, 2016 at 10:56 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Is the Atheism/Theism belief/disbelief a false dichotomy? are there other options? Psychonaut 69 16819 October 5, 2015 at 1:06 pm
Last Post: houseofcantor



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)