|
Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
|
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?   (January 19, 2011 at 8:29 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:(January 19, 2011 at 6:48 pm)Thor Wrote: Oh, good grief! We don't have to OBSERVE geologic events to know what happened! What about god he clearly lacks observable proof, so does everything in the bible lacks observable proof, how do you know that Jesus existed you only have a book that tells you that he did how observable is that?  RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
January 20, 2011 at 4:27 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2011 at 2:24 pm by TheDarkestOfAngels.)
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925 Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan 
So Statler, nothing to say about gods purpose for supernova remnents and colliding galaxies???
No?? didn't think so. However an old universe theory fits them in just nicely. Guess you've just failed again. 
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif) If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71. (January 20, 2011 at 8:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: So Statler, nothing to say about gods purpose for supernova remnents and colliding galaxies??? What are you talking about? God's purpose in creation is to bring glory to Himself, period. As to this misconception that supernova remnants point to an old universe, nothing could be farther from the truth. Let's take a look at the numbers Expected number of observable supernova remnants if the universe were billions of years old: Stage 1: 2 Stage 2: 2260 Stage 3: 5000 Expected number of observable supernova remnants if the universe were only thousands of years old: Stage 1: 2 Stage 2: 125 Stage 3: 0 Actual observable supernova remnants to date: Stage 1: 5 Stage 2: 200 Stage 3: 0 So you can see, the actual observable data are far more in line with a young universe than an old one. Thanks for bringing the topic up! As far as movement of galaxies, many spiral galaxies actually wind up too quickly in order to be billions of years old, so that is pretty good young universe evidence too. Thanks for that one too! 
They are also millions of light years away.
Good evidence for an old universe wouldnt you say. So thanks for that. You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
