|
Serious question to believers.
|
 (December 12, 2017 at 1:45 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah I refuse to watch a video in place of discussion. EB says it's a stupid question anyway, so there's that too. It's a stupid, vulgar question that is also irrelevant to any theology I've ever heard of. I like Sarah Silverman and the joke itself is shock humor, but it sure as shit isn't a basis for any sort of real discussion.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson  (December 12, 2017 at 1:52 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(December 12, 2017 at 1:45 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah I refuse to watch a video in place of discussion. EB says it's a stupid question anyway, so there's that too. Ok, good to know.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh 
It's not actually a serious question/video. It's just a stand-up bit. Calling it serious question was a joke. A "made you look" type thing, I imagine, as you two were supposed to watch the video, and feel stupid for having been duped into seeing the lowbrow standup bit instead.
So far, it seems like this is all working pretty well, and this thread will likely be stickied for all time due to its greatness.  (December 12, 2017 at 1:18 pm)purplepurpose Wrote: At 1:40 starts the short question. It lasts around 10 seconds. If it's that short, there should be no problem with your posing it yourself. We're not talking to Sarah Silverman, we're talking to you.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Here you go, cock -leper OP, if you're going to get yer edjimacation from YouTube at least pick something intelligent:
I'll take questions when you're done.  RE: Serious question to believers.
December 12, 2017 at 2:04 pm
(This post was last modified: December 12, 2017 at 2:09 pm by purplepurpose.)
(December 12, 2017 at 2:00 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Here you go, cock -leper OP, if you're going to get yer edjimacation from YouTube at least pick something intelligent: I already heard a lot on this forum regarding the core trend idea of disbelief - it's better to be dead if you can't be independent. God doesn't provide independence he demands the opposite - submission and the more the better. Believer at this last statement draw "invisible AK-47/hell" and demand submission at the "gunpoint". F that. (December 12, 2017 at 1:53 pm)wallym Wrote: It's not actually a serious question/video. It's just a stand-up bit. Calling it serious question was a joke. A "made you look" type thing, I imagine, as you two were supposed to watch the video, and feel stupid for having been duped into seeing the lowbrow standup bit instead. Also, I've never heard of this Sara Silverman. Whoa buddyyy!!
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]](https://external-preview.redd.it/nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWTNVY.jpg?width=216&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=7b11e8b38bea0eacc8797fc971574ddc2a24480e)
