Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 30, 2024, 2:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
#1
You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
Well fuck.  What's the point of winning if you can't oppress people!

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/gerryma...itutional/

Quote:Gerrymandered North Carolina congressional districts drawn by Republicans ruled unconstitutional

Quote:The judges — James A. Wynn, a Barack Obama appointee to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and federal District Judges W. Earl Britt, a Jimmy Carter appointee, and William L. Osteen Jr., a George W. Bush appointee — were unanimous that North Carolina lawmakers under Republican leadership violated the Constitution's equal-protection clause when they drew maps explicitly to favor their party.

"On its most fundamental level, partisan gerrymandering violates 'the core principle of republican government ... that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around,'" the majority opinion states.

Republicunts never see it that way, your honors.
Reply
#2
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
You would disenfranchise Republicans in a second if it were up to you.

But gerrymandering is total bullshit.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#3
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
I defy you to find one word I have ever written which says that you assholes should be denied the right to vote.
Reply
#4
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
Hillary didn't have a problem disenfranchising Democrat primary voters in 2016.

Guess I'm finding this an especially and particularly odd topic to be bringing up . . . . .



Huh
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#5
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
Quote:Hillary didn't have a problem disenfranchising Democrat primary voters in 2016.

How?  By holding a gun to their heads so that they voted for her?

Which they did....overwhelmingly.

Your boy lost, V.  Get over it.
Reply
#6
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
I fear Bernie Busters are going to be the people who snatch defeat from the jaws of victory next round.

Maybe we should find the next, younger upstart progressives to take back the governor, congressional and senate seats?

And yes, I voted Sanders in the primary. So I feel I can call attention to the bitterness-complex in the Sanderista contingent because the last thing we need is a leftist Trump to fuck our shit up. Bitterness only begets bitterness. The only way you change the establishment is voting in new blood. Not railing at it, whining about it or pouting like a child because a large, well known minority overwhelmingly chose the name they're familiar with in the previous primary and had longer term preexisting relationships with said choice.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#7
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
(January 10, 2018 at 12:13 am)Minimalist Wrote: Well fuck.  What's the point of winning if you can't oppress people!

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/gerryma...itutional/

Quote:Gerrymandered North Carolina congressional districts drawn by Republicans ruled unconstitutional

Quote:The judges — James A. Wynn, a Barack Obama appointee to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and federal District Judges W. Earl Britt, a Jimmy Carter appointee, and William L. Osteen Jr., a George W. Bush appointee — were unanimous that North Carolina lawmakers under Republican leadership violated the Constitution's equal-protection clause when they drew maps explicitly to favor their party.

"On its most fundamental level, partisan gerrymandering violates 'the core principle of republican government ... that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around,'" the majority opinion states.

Republicunts never see it that way, your honors.

 I live here. And I moved here in 05. I knew something was up after Obama won the first time, when in the 08 election my poling place was diverse as hell. But after he won the first time in 10 seemed like all the black people were not there, and even his second run far less, at the same polling place. Now when I go I see nothing but white people. 

It was fishy as hell. I know even with white liberals, we have a bad history of not showing up in midterms, but the difference from year to year was striking. I lived in Northern Va when I first started voting, and never did that mix change. Shit, even in Lynchburg  it seemed more even, and that was Fuckwell's city.
Reply
#8
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
(January 10, 2018 at 1:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I defy you to find one word I have ever written which says that you assholes should be denied the right to vote.

No, but if Gerrymandering were to work to advantage the Democrat vote over the Republican vote you'd be all for it.

(January 10, 2018 at 8:31 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: I fear Bernie Busters are going to be the people who snatch defeat from the jaws of victory next round.

Maybe we should find the next, younger upstart progressives to take back the governor, congressional and senate seats?

And yes, I voted Sanders in the primary. So I feel I can call attention to the bitterness-complex in the Sanderista contingent because the last thing we need is a leftist Trump to fuck our shit up. Bitterness only begets bitterness. The only way you change the establishment is voting in new blood. Not railing at it, whining about it or pouting like a child because a large, well known minority overwhelmingly chose the name they're familiar with in the previous primary and had longer term preexisting relationships with said choice.
The Democrats need a moderate who at least has a message that will resonate with the blue collar workers in the Rust Belt and Coal States. With the economy, the market, and the jobs numbers on the rise, the Dems have an uphill battle to climb. Although they may win a seat in the House since Darrell Issa is retiring.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"

[Image: freddy_03.jpg]

Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.
Reply
#9
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
(January 10, 2018 at 1:48 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:Hillary didn't have a problem disenfranchising Democrat primary voters in 2016.

How?  By holding a gun to their heads so that they voted for her?

Which they did....overwhelmingly.

Your boy lost, V.  Get over it.



The primary election. The P-R-I-M-A-R-Y. Sound it out. You know, the one RIGGED against Bernie. Rigged elections by definition disenfranchise the voters.

Is it too much to ask that folks not comprehending my posts not bother replying to them ??
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#10
RE: You Mean We Can't Disenfranchise Democrats?
(January 10, 2018 at 10:04 pm)A Theist Wrote:
(January 10, 2018 at 1:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I defy you to find one word I have ever written which says that you assholes should be denied the right to vote.

No, but if Gerrymandering were to work to advantage the Democrat vote over the Republican vote you'd be all for it.

(January 10, 2018 at 8:31 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: I fear Bernie Busters are going to be the people who snatch defeat from the jaws of victory next round.

Maybe we should find the next, younger upstart progressives to take back the governor, congressional and senate seats?

And yes, I voted Sanders in the primary. So I feel I can call attention to the bitterness-complex in the Sanderista contingent because the last thing we need is a leftist Trump to fuck our shit up. Bitterness only begets bitterness. The only way you change the establishment is voting in new blood. Not railing at it, whining about it or pouting like a child because a large, well known minority overwhelmingly chose the name they're familiar with in the previous primary and had longer term preexisting relationships with said choice.
The Democrats need a moderate who at least has a message that will resonate with the blue collar workers in the Rust Belt and Coal States. With the economy, the market, and the jobs numbers on the rise, the Dems have an uphill battle to climb. Although they may win a seat in the House since Darrell Issa is retiring.

Mommy mommy, I don't like it when others vote differently.

Yea that is why we have COURTS.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Democrats conspiracy theory exposed Agnostico 65 4708 May 25, 2020 at 7:43 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  [Serious] Can you sew? Can you save a life? Gawdzilla Sama 30 2584 April 5, 2020 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  [Serious] America can you pls stop meddling in countries you have no busienss in. Cepheus Ace 44 2541 March 26, 2019 at 11:51 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  I Knew Democrats Were Better! Minimalist 4 824 November 17, 2018 at 9:48 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Hurricane Michael created by Democrats Foxaèr 6 1051 October 12, 2018 at 8:41 am
Last Post: Amarok
  Democrats Don't Fight Massive Defense Budget Increase at ALL The Industrial Atheist 23 3712 June 24, 2018 at 12:08 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Hit- I mean Trump youth speech Amarok 1 471 July 26, 2017 at 12:05 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Democrats - Corrupt, and incompetent about it John V 10 3270 June 2, 2017 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Trump’s Russia-U.S. Comparison Rejected by Democrats and Republicans Foxaèr 22 3449 February 9, 2017 at 3:55 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Nearly 50% of Democrats believe Christians are a bigger threat to the US than Muslims *Deidre* 38 8237 January 7, 2016 at 1:31 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)