Western terrorism.

[WinterHold]

Isn't it just like an islamist to tell people what they can and can't talk about?

No. Contexts decide what we should speak or not speak about.
First, you name your context; that is called "Topic's title".
Second, you write down what you want to speak about.
A reply to the post, must be related totally or partially to its content's subject.
What you're doing, is taking huge turns to avoid the direct subject; and the main subject of the topic.
The context again is "western terrorism": The western regimes and governments were built after rivers of blood, represented in the intentional murder of 100 Million people including large numbers of civilians. We discussed the American & British bombing of the city of Hamburg during the war as an example of the terrorism. These two super powers targeted children and civilians with incendiary weapons; creating one of the largest firestorms in history.
^The above is the context.
What does Islam has to do with it?
What is the justification of such crimes against humanity?

and demonization of the west

There is 100 Million people murdered by the hand of the regimes controlling that culture!
And since that day, the killing won't stop: civilians are being killed under different names like "War on Terror".
Do you realize what 100 Million dead in 10 years mean?

You don't want to talk about ww2 either, to be blunt, if that discussion includes a mention of islamic ss units

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Arabian_Legion

Size 20,000

Your justification for the killing and the burning of Hamburg, Dresden, and other numerous places, the nuking of Hiroshima & Nagazaki, the intentional targeting of women and children who are not fighters, from the east to the west; is that a 20,000 Arab militia, was in the war ?

That's you justification ?

[Wyrd of Gawd]

What's the primary lesson to be learned from wars? You should never, ever, start one unless you have the weapon systems and group will to win. That's why the Palestinians are currently stupid for trying to fight Israel. They simply don't have the weapon systems to win. Iran could defeat Israel if it had 12 nukes and the will to use them. It might take some hits in return but it will be able to completely destroy Israel (and almost everyone else in the area).

During WWII Nazi Germany, Japan, and Italy lacked the necessary weapon systems and logistical systems needed to win. They lost the war as soon as they fired the first shot. They were still thinking that they were fighting a 19th Century war instead of a 20th Century war.

The USSR wouldn't have been able to defeat the US in a conventional war because it lacked the systems and capability to do so. We had too many access points to attack them and they didn't have any to attack us.

If it became necessary we would kill every muslim on the planet without a second thought. And never think that we won't do it. And guess what? Allah will be no where to be seen (and neither will "Jesus").

[Abaddon_ire]

This is all a massive tu quoque. Atlas is simply searching blindly for an excuse for the abject barbarity that is embedded in the superstitious nonsense of his chosen religion.

To Atlas, "the west" is simply a blanket term for everyone who is not a muslim regardless of whether the originate from north, south, east or west.

Stalin? The west. Pol pot? The west. The Hutus? The west. Boko Haram? The west. The moon? The west. Exploration of Mars? The west.

No muslim at any time anywhere has ever done anything wrong. Obviously. Because Big Al and Lil Mo wouldn't allow that of course.

[The Grand Nudger]

No. Contexts decide what we should speak or not speak about.
First, you name your context; that is called "Topic's title".
Second, you write down what you want to speak about.
A reply to the post, must be related totally or partially to its content's subject.
What you're doing, is taking huge turns to avoid the direct subject; and the main subject of the topic.
The context again is "western terrorism": The western regimes and governments were built after rivers of blood, represented in the intentional murder of 100 Million people including large numbers of civilians. We discussed the American & British bombing of the city of Hamburg during the war as an example of the terrorism. These two super powers targeted children and civilians with incendiary weapons; creating one of the largest firestorms in history.
^The above is the context.
What does Islam has to do with it?
What is the justification of such crimes against humanity?

War, Atlas, as far as it goes.  If the allies had precision munitions then perhaps they'd have used them..we certainly like to use them now..but they didn't.  The laziest google search would explain the military value of Hamburg as a target and the reason for such broad civilian casualties as a consequence of technology.  There are other bombings that more closely mirror terrorism..though not quite..and another lazy google search would disabuse you of your misapprehensions in this regard.  This has been true every time you start ranting about this.  

There is 100 Million people murdered by the hand of the regimes controlling that culture!
And since that day, the killing won't stop: civilians are being killed under different names like "War on Terror".
Do you realize what 100 Million dead in 10 years mean?

It means the world was at war.  Terrorists can only dream of such lethal efficiency, as of yet.  They are dreaming about it, though..aren't they..god willing..and he certainly does will as far as they're concerned.

Your justification for the killing and the burning of Hamburg, Dresden, and other numerous places, the nuking of Hiroshima & Nagazaki, the intentional targeting of women and children who are not fighters, from the east to the west; is that a 20,000 Arab militia, was in the war ?

That's you justification ?

OFC not you numbskull, lol.  I see you can use the internet though..and that makes the rest of the thread difficult to understand.  I'm simply pointing out that "the west" in your example of "western terrorism" included muslims who were instrumental in securing the oilfields upon which the axis war machine depended, and participated as axis forces in the perpetuation of the war and killing.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The Mufti of Jerusalem spent most of WWII in Berlin.