The Einstein is practical, but not theoretical?

[robinhood]

Is perfectly known, that the Einstein has disapproved the Black Hole (BH) solutions. It was horrible to have an divergence, the infinities (BH, Big Bang) in the equations? The Einstein has assumed Matter conservation during the derivation of General Relativity, but it is violated in the consequences: BH, BB. Thus, the GR is wrong. Recall, the Nikola Tesla (who was blessed by his father, Eastern Orthodox Christian) that Nikola was in disagreement with Einstein. You might argue, that singular areas of divergences can be replaced by hypothetical Quantum Gravity, however to preserve the analytical solutions, all derivatives must be continuous, so the Quantum Gravity must cover all area of spacetime. Thus, in any point of spacetime the current General Relativity has trouble (with conservation laws of matter).

The facts are:
1. the space and time can be curved. Special curviness accounts for observable effects. But I argue in the researchgate.net files, that curved spacetime pays no regard to energy-momentum conservation.
2. the Einstein and us have added many ad-hoc hypothesises into the original GR. First ad-hoc was the cosmological constant Lambda. Now it seems necessary to add Dark Matter tensor as well.

What does the energy-momentum conservation law mean? Energy means the body itself, and the impulse arises every time we run to this body: the body itself "runs" to us. So this law means the indestructibility of matter (within methodological naturalism). However, in Einstein's Gravity Theory, there are singularities, and the Big Bang, and time machines. All of them do not treat with due respect the invincibility of the material world.
“The collapse of physics as we know it” 
More complete in:


Monstrous Black Hole eats people in the clip: “Black Hole Sun”.

For certain, therefore, it is impossible to marry the Quantum Theory (latter respects the indestructibility of matter, because quantum scientists talk about "preserving information" even in the very epicenter of a thermonuclear explosion!) and Einstein's Theory.
“What Is the Black Hole Information Paradox?” YouTube.

So, we found out that the LAW OF ENERGY SAVING IS NOT IMPLEMENTED in the consequences of Einstein's Theory. However, in the article of the Russian Wikipedia "General Theory of Relativity" it is reported that
"In the general theory of relativity, the energy-momentum conservation law is used as a heuristic principle in deriving the equations of the gravitational field [Einstein A. Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity. M. Nauka, 1965, vol. 1, p. 490.] ".
We make a logical conclusion: Einstein's Theory of Gravity is refuted. Maybe from here spooks us the Dark Matter and Dark Energy: “What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?” YouTube.

[Banned]

The universe is made by the relationship between two forces which are also somewhat paradoxical to each other.
The relationship involves variations of interaction which are instrumental in producing matter and everything in the universe, including gravity and the black hole and dark matter effects etc.
The forces govern all the physical laws and their contexts such as expected in GR - which doesn't have an external context and is therefore not entirely true.

The forces determine how much matter will exist at anytime and all of its properties.
So we can expect to see different sized planets having different gravitational values without pretending that those differences are due to a different mass.
We don't have to hollow out, or make up gaseous theories about planets, like for instance Saturn, in order to convince ourselves that that will be the only way they can remain in orbit.

This idea goes against the theory of the direct relationship between mass and gravity, which isn't true anyway, because mass doesn't cause gravity, but the forces which make up matter do.

[Edwardo Piet]

My favorite Einstein quotation:

"If the moon, in the act of completing its eternal way around the earth, were gifted with self-consciousness, it would feel thoroughly convinced that it was traveling its way of its own accord…. So would a being, endowed with higher insight and more perfect intelligence, watching man and his doings, smile about man’s illusion that he was acting according to his own free will" - Albert Einstein

[chimp3]

Is perfectly known, that the Einstein has disapproved the Black Hole (BH) solutions. It was horrible to have an divergence, the infinities (BH, Big Bang) in the equations? The Einstein has assumed Matter conservation during the derivation of General Relativity, but it is violated in the consequences: BH, BB. Thus, the GR is wrong. Recall, the Nikola Tesla (who was blessed by his father, Eastern Orthodox Christian) that Nikola was in disagreement with Einstein. You might argue, that singular areas of divergences can be replaced by hypothetical Quantum Gravity, however to preserve the analytical solutions, all derivatives must be continuous, so the Quantum Gravity must cover all area of spacetime. Thus, in any point of spacetime the current General Relativity has trouble (with conservation laws of matter).

The facts are:
1. the space and time can be curved. Special curviness accounts for observable effects. But I argue in the researchgate.net files, that curved spacetime pays no regard to energy-momentum conservation.
2. the Einstein and us have added many ad-hoc hypothesises into the original GR. First ad-hoc was the cosmological constant Lambda. Now it seems necessary to add Dark Matter tensor as well.

What does the energy-momentum conservation law mean? Energy means the body itself, and the impulse arises every time we run to this body: the body itself "runs" to us. So this law means the indestructibility of matter (within methodological naturalism). However, in Einstein's Gravity Theory, there are singularities, and the Big Bang, and time machines. All of them do not treat with due respect the invincibility of the material world.
“The collapse of physics as we know it” 
More complete in:


Monstrous Black Hole eats people in the clip: “Black Hole Sun”.

For certain, therefore, it is impossible to marry the Quantum Theory (latter respects the indestructibility of matter, because quantum scientists talk about "preserving information" even in the very epicenter of a thermonuclear explosion!) and Einstein's Theory.
“What Is the Black Hole Information Paradox?” YouTube.

So, we found out that the LAW OF ENERGY SAVING IS NOT IMPLEMENTED in the consequences of Einstein's Theory. However, in the article of the Russian Wikipedia "General Theory of Relativity" it is reported that
"In the general theory of relativity, the energy-momentum conservation law is used as a heuristic principle in deriving the equations of the gravitational field [Einstein A. Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity. M. Nauka, 1965, vol. 1, p. 490.] ".
We make a logical conclusion: Einstein's Theory of Gravity is refuted. Maybe from here spooks us the Dark Matter and Dark Energy: “What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy?” YouTube.

Amateur Physics much?

[vulcanlogician]

My favorite Einstein quotation:

"If the moon, in the act of completing its eternal way around the earth, were gifted with self-consciousness, it would feel thoroughly convinced that it was traveling its way of its own accord…. So would a being, endowed with higher insight and more perfect intelligence, watching man and his doings, smile about man’s illusion that he was acting according to his own free will" - Albert Einstein

Einstein was a Spinozist. Not many people are aware of that. Fun fact. (And it is made clear by Hammy's quote, which is why I brought it up.)

[LostLocke]

I smell a dirty sock....

[vulcanlogician]

... better than a crusty sock, amirite?

[ignoramus]

Therefore God ...we get it.

Welcome btw!

[Fireball]

I smell a dirty sock....

Ooh! Ooh! Is it the guy with all the supreme programming skillsz, again?

In response to the OP, Einstein's work was quite theoretical, until some of the tougher measurements were able to be made.

[ignoramus]

ProgrammingJordanGod