Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 5:46 pm

Poll: Would you use a Star Trek style transporter?
This poll is closed.
I'd love to! Beam me up Scotty!
58.82%
10 58.82%
If I have to... But I'm always on edge, like flying.
0%
0 0%
No Way, are you out of your fucking mind!
41.18%
7 41.18%
Sorry, It goes against my religious beliefs
0%
0 0%
Go transport this poll up your arse!
0%
0 0%
Total 17 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
#21
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
ok ... this is what I want to explore...
If it is indistinguishable from the original (apart from the location of creation of course), why are we still funny about doing it...

Do we as atheists believe we are more than the sum of our parts?

Let the woo spill out man! Tell me what it is exactly that bothers you... Do you not agree with Boru's post?
Is our fear a philosophical objection entirely with no foundation in reality...
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#22
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
Hell yes!

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#23
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
I seem to remember the transporter screwing up in several episodes, so that goes in the con list. I also remember that the transporter computer retains the code to duplicate the individual (if functioning properly), definitely a pro.

Based on this criteria I think I'd do it at least once, so that I could have my code saved. The risk to benefit ratio seems pro.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#24
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
No saving your code indefinitely ... That would make us potentially immortal.
Plus, there would not be enough silicon in the universe to store everyone's code.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#25
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
(March 27, 2018 at 7:01 pm)ignoramus Wrote: No saving your code indefinitely ... That would make us potentially immortal.
Plus, there would not be enough silicon in the universe to store everyone's code.

Don't want that, just saved long enough to fix misadventure. In my old age I've become a clumsy fuck. And there is a shit ton of assholes on the road.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#26
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
(March 27, 2018 at 7:01 pm)ignoramus Wrote: No saving your code indefinitely ... That would make us potentially immortal.
Plus, there would not be enough silicon in the universe to store everyone's code.

Pamela Anderson.

'Nuff said.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
#27
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
Although in Star Trek the transporter is supposed to move your actual atoms rather than rebuild you each time with new atoms. No idea if that makes a difference to being you. And there are some episodes where I think it's suggested that people stay aware during the transportation. But that must break down at some point. Maybe they are aware while still being scanned. And why isn't it painful?
Reply
#28
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
Move as in copy/delete ? I thought ... could be wrong though... It is only bs at the end of the day...

As you may have heard in the last week, 2 dudes can categorically prove (for all intents and purposes) that we are not living in a simulation.
Basically there's some quantum shit that happens (in our universe) that cannot be recreated using any type of computing power ...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...ation.html

I think Elon Musk alluded that it's more worrisome if we're not living in a sim. He feels that either we (post human) or some other race never progressed enough to reach that stage...
Maybe all the more reasons why we are alone in the universe.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#29
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
An example of a scientist explaining why a philosopher is talking shit. In this case Nick Bostrom who also talks utter shit about AI. This is a good example of what I am arguing about in my thread about philosophy regarding philosophers needing to know enough about the field they talk about.
Reply
#30
RE: hypothetical #3 -Star Trek transporter
hehe ...what is the actual skill of a philosopher? (if not talking unfalsifiable bullshit Dunno)
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Charles Bronson movie star Woah0 9 1122 September 12, 2022 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 623 May 5, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 1060 May 4, 2020 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Duty
  Super Heroes, Star Wars and Star Trek is the worst entertainment made in US history Sanau 18 2236 March 30, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
Wink Star Wars plot holes? Wash your mouth out! ignoramus 3 654 May 23, 2019 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Have a Stellar Star Wars Day onlinebiker 44 3941 May 5, 2019 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Nakara
  Star Trek Discovery Season 2 is Good Mechaghostman2 28 4386 March 25, 2019 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  10 things you didn’t know about Star Wars robvalue 3 1036 March 20, 2019 at 7:13 am
Last Post: Yonadav
  Star Wars fan film: Darth Vader: Episode 1 Shards ofthe Past Cepheus Ace 5 699 December 23, 2018 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Maketakunai
  What's your longest trek? Gawdzilla Sama 39 3599 June 28, 2018 at 1:24 am
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)