Should circumcision be illegal?

[LastPoet]

My mom taught me how to do my higiene in the uncircuncised peen.

But this is more cultural to the US than religious (barring jews). In Portugal that procedure is only used in children of dire need, like a closed prepuce or infection.

My wife wanted as a tradition to pierce the ears of Sofia, because "girls look nice with earrings" and "its less painful while she is young". No fucking way and over my stone cold deadbody. She will have the piercings she want when she grows old enough to be able to pay for those. Otherwise, I do not own my daughter. She is mine only in the sense that I have the responsability to care for her until she grows wings to fly on her own.

I guess if it were a tradition on the US, the clit snip would be acceptable, as it makes women more "pure", huh?

Out of curiosity, where do you draw the line?

Orthodontics? haircuts? fingernails?  

I read this far. Know that I am not interested in discussing this with you anymore. So shove your half witted rethoric up your arse because we clearly are not talking about the same thing. Teeth problems are a CLEAR CUT case of a health problem like clised prepuces, hair grows back sure as nails.

We are talking about irreversible procedures done on a non consenting human for the sake of vanity.

Don't adress me again with such childish arguments. You got cut up and are broken to accept it because your parents love you? Good. But you are FUBAR.

[Amarok]

So if kids don't want shots you shouldn't give them their shots?? Lol, I wouldn't gotten any in that case, I hated needles when I was a kid.

Unless it's medically needed as either a therapeutic or remedial procedure it should be banned .

[LastPoet]

I undertand more about the sanctity of life than ever. A woman is obligated to carry a child on her expense to the end, so that she can start trimming parts of that baby up for purely cultural reasons. Precious.

And these are the same people always accusing others of promoting eugenics. Can't beat the irony of that.

I am not a believer anymore, If I was, the perfect being god gave me and my wife is not to be tampered by my personal vanities. Such shiuld only be done incase if desease or to prevent desease.

Face the truth of your immorality dumbfucks. Fuck me, everything serves as an excuse to serve your overblown egos.

[Amarok]

I think his point is they permanently change your teeth/jaw though

But they are medically needed as twisted teeth etc can have huge negative effects on the skull and jaws .

[Catholic_Lady]

Out of curiosity, where do you draw the line?

Orthodontics? haircuts? fingernails?  

I read this far. Know that I am not interested in discussing this with you anymore. So shove your half witted rethoric up your arse because we clearly are not talking about the same thing. Teeth problems are a CLEAR CUT case of a health problem like clised prepuces, hair grows back sure as nails.

We are talking about irreversible procedures done on a non consenting human for the sake of vanity.

Don't adress me again with such childish arguments. You got cut up and are broken to accept it because your parents love you? Good. But you are FUBAR.

Very rarely are braces beneficial to health. It's almost always a purely aesthetic thing.

[Whateverist]

Fascinating topic! Absolutely the first time it has ever come up.

I realize that those with all the skin still on their willies believe my beanie headed weiner is incapable of giving me any sexual satisfaction. However I've got 65 years of use, 44 of them spent dipping the beanie boy in pussy, and I ain't complaining.

Hell I don't even have a tat, a piercing, a lip disc or any other sort of skin sculpting. So if I can keep it on the down low about all that shit you all are into, what say you lay off my beanie m'kay?

[Amarok]

As for the AAP's position here's a good critique

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.....00018/pdf

[Losty]

I think it should be illegal to preform on children. If someone wants it they can get it done as an adult.

You can ask Valk.  She'd probably agree.  It's more reasonable done on an infant who won't have any memory of the pain.  An adult WILL have memory of the pain, wishing his parents had been smart enough to have it done when he was an infant.

Ok. I didn’t know Valk was the authority on genital mutilation 🙄
Anyway, it’s entirely unnecessary alteration of the genitals it shouldn’t be allowed on children regardless of whether or not they’ll remember it.

[Whateverist]

You can ask Valk.  She'd probably agree.  It's more reasonable done on an infant who won't have any memory of the pain.  An adult WILL have memory of the pain, wishing his parents had been smart enough to have it done when he was an infant.

Ok. I didn’t know Valk was the authority on genital mutilation 🙄
Anyway, it’s entirely unnecessary alteration of the genitals it shouldn’t be allowed on children regardless of whether or not they’ll remember it.

Huh, I'd heard the ladies all went for a guy in a beanie.  Not true?

[Catholic_Lady]

Lol, beanie