The Fucktard Forgot Who He Was Talking To

[Minimalist]

[Amarok]

But Min Trumps saved Korea and cured the common cold and made it rain gold . Because some people who have a vested interest in giving him credit said so. Coal sanction ! Coal sanctions ! i tell you 

But were all a bunch of evil lefties who want America to fail because we accept the president's an idiot . 

[CapnAwesome]

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/watch-t...t-workers/

Trump declares unemployment problem solved and announces plan to let low-skill guest workers in

“We’re going to have strong borders, but we have to have your workers come in… The employment picture is so good, so strong, that we have to let people in.

While talking a lot about the wall, Trump said that he would allow guest workers to come in. But, he said, he would then want them to leave.
“Guest workers. Don’t we agree? We have to have ’em,” he said.
The line got tepid applause.

And by "plan" he means that his brain farted inside his head and he sniffed it up and exhaled it into a microphone.

Are you against guest workers?

[Pat Mustard]

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/watch-t...t-workers/



And by "plan" he means that his brain farted inside his head and he sniffed it up and exhaled it into a microphone.

Are you against guest workers?

No but Drumpfuck's one policy was to be against them. Guess the minimum wage must be too high to allow his businesses to survive.

[Amarok]

Are you against guest workers?

No but he's being inconsistent

[CapnAwesome]

Are you against guest workers?

No but Drumpfuck's one policy was to be against them. Guess the minimum wage must be too high to allow his businesses to survive.

I don't recall him speaking against guest workers. I think I remember him saying before he'd allow some legal immigration or guest workers, but it's hard to keep track of it all. Source?

Also do you really want Trump to be consistent with all the things he's said. You guys have just made a strange catch 22. If Trump had a policy banning all guest workers you'd be blasting that. If he decides to allow some, that also apparently is grounds for criticism. Do you not see the problem there?

This is why uninformed people on these forums mistake me for defending Trump, which I didn't vote for him, wouldn't ever vote for him in the future. But when people criticise him for doing what they would praise a liberal for, it makes no sense to me at all. It's just automatic naysaying because it's Trump, and in my opinion, makes no sense and is inconsistent in itself.

[Amarok]

Oh i'll criticize him if he's consistent . Because i think it's still a shitty idea. But i further respect someone who sticks to their beliefs consistently to someone who flip flops just to avoid  negative backlash . Better an honest devil at least you know were they stand . And if a Liberal did the same i would criticize them  .

[CapnAwesome]

Oh i'll criticize him if he's consistent . Because i think it's still a shitty idea. But i further respect someone who sticks to their beliefs consistently to someone who flip flops just to avoid  negative backlash . Better an honest devil at least you know were they stand . And if a Liberal did the same i would criticize them  .

So you basically admit that you'll criticize him no matter what. But I still need a source where he said he'd ban guest workers. I don't remember that at all. I think in fact it's the opposite. Even his hotels use them.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The Random Quote Generator In Chief doesn't really think about what he's saying, he just needs to say SOMETHING. It's called, IIRC, "the pressure of speech."

[Amarok]