DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[The Grand Nudger]

The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo.  It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.

[Silver]

The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo.  It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.

Ironically, they think the same about us.

[Anomalocaris]

The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo.  It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.

Ironically, they think the same about us.

They have faith, which is to say the believe whatever they want to believe, which by definition means they can believe they are never wrong if they like.

We have reality, which is to say we test our beliefs against reality, and when found wanting, make corrections.

Even when wrong, we are righter than they can possibly comprehend.

[Amarok]

The peak was a 5 - 10 million years was the main part of it I meant.  My typo trying to respond to all these posts.

Nope 7 to 15 million was the peak as driven by oxygen increases . But changes occured throughout the Period it was not that rapid and well within evolution time scales and it ample pressure and opportunity for it to do it . And by the way we have precambrian fossils. and your overall point was still a fallacy of absence . And already explained why fossils would not be common.

[Anomalocaris]

That's pile of shit. the explosion took 25 million  years. And we have found plenty of  gradual fossils thou not as many as other periods . But  we should expect fossils of the period to be rare as conditions were poor for fossilization and the destruction of fossil beds  on the sea bed would have been common due to seismic activity in that period  . And once again your going back to your fallacy of "if we have not found it .So it does not exist.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cambrian_explosion

The peak was a 5 - 10 million years was the main part of it I meant.  My typo trying to respond to all these posts.

I am curious.  CDF acknowledges that the earth is 4.56 billion years old, and not all species have existed since time immemorial, and some were introduced onto the earth during the Cambrian explosion.  But no “kind”, whatever that means, ever became another.

What happens when the new kind is introduced?   Did a great hand with a hole through the wrist reach down holding a brace of different squealing trilobites and set them in the water?

Did a halo appear suddenly and a few befuddled trilobites with no memory of what they did in the morning come through?

Did god just mold clay into trilobites on some potter’s Wheel on the ocean floor?

[Amarok]

The peak was a 5 - 10 million years was the main part of it I meant.  My typo trying to respond to all these posts.

I am curious.  CDF acknowledges that the earth is 4.56 billion years old, and not all species have existed since time immemorial, and some were introduced onto the earth during the Cambrian explosion.  But no “kind”, whatever that means, ever became another.

What happens when the new kind is introduced?   Did a great hand with a hole through the wrist reach now holding a brace of different squealing trilobites and set them in the water?

Did a halo appear suddenly a few befuddled trilobites with no memory of what they did in the morning come through?

Did god just mold clay into trilobites on some potter’s Wheel on the ocean floor?

Probably what he's going to say . Absurd huh.

[Nay_Sayer]

200+ hasn't stayed dormant for more than a few minutes.

[The Valkyrie]

No, really.

Behe??

[Silver]

Huh???

[CDF47]

Precursors have not been found.  The pump is a different 10 part system than the 40 part motor.  They just share similar parts and are configured a like.

Even if that were true, it would still be a fallacious argument.  You're quibbling about the terms of surrender after you've already lost the battle.

I didn't lose anything.  You wish I did.  Watch the video I posted covers this in great detail.

---

Disagree

Your wrong no disagreement to be had .

---

Why irreducible complexity is flawed by conception and pseudoscience 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...udoscience

---

The expelled leaders guide ripped to pieces 
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Expelled:_...%27s_Guide

---

Try this experiment if you ever find yourself talking to a proponent of ID. Say, "OK, for the sake of argument let's say evolution is wrong and let's forget about it. Now tell me how intelligent design works." Having tried this a few times myself, I am confident that you will be met with nothing but an awkward silence.
—Amanda Gefter[

Good one Amanda

---

Watch my good friend and Biologist Fiona Robertson own someone very much like CD




And Kicking ID ass a little further up the totem pole .

---

Why ID information theory is bollocks. From a professor of computer science . 

http://recursed.blogspot.ca/2009/10/step...heory.html

Neo-Darwinist propaganda. Where does the information in DNA come from?

---

The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo.  It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.

It's because we are right.

---

The most impressive failure of creationism and creationists isn;t in the fact that they get biology wrong from the ground floor to thew penthouse, imo.  It's their complete inability to imagine a world in which they're wrong about any single thing.

Ironically, they think the same about us.

Exactly.

---

Ironically, they think the same about us.

They have faith, which is to say the believe whatever they want to believe, which by definition means they can believe they are never wrong if they like.

We have reality, which is to say we test our beliefs against reality, and when found wanting, make corrections.

Even when wrong, we are righter than they can possibly comprehend.

LOL.  Yeah right.

---

The peak was a 5 - 10 million years was the main part of it I meant.  My typo trying to respond to all these posts.

I am curious.  CDF acknowledges that the earth is 4.56 billion years old, and not all species have existed since time immemorial, and some were introduced onto the earth during the Cambrian explosion.  But no “kind”, whatever that means, ever became another.

What happens when the new kind is introduced?   Did a great hand with a hole through the wrist reach down holding a brace of different squealing trilobites and set them in the water?

Did a halo appear suddenly and a few befuddled trilobites with no memory of what they did in the morning come through?

Did god just mold clay into trilobites on some potter’s Wheel on the ocean floor?

Not sure how He chooses to add new information into the systems to have them created.

---

No, really.

Behe??

Behe is an excellent scientist.  You are just biased of your views against him.