DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

No, what you are doing is using you belief in an antithetical to say you don't believe in the antithesis to what you believe. I am not here to convince you of anything M8 

What the hell you on about?

[Quick]

Digital code in living systems = Design.  This is so obvious, I can't believe we are even discussing it.

You can't even figure out how you're abusing the term digital yet you want us to take everything you say at face value. Fuck that!

Are you ever going to actually reply to any of the posts I've made beyond your one lame answer?

Some of these peoples "religious views" are quite comical.

---

I could argue they fit under multiple same categories.

I;m sure you could...but why Quick...why....lol?

I get that you're not here fishing for men, like our boy CDF (and I appreciate that, btw)...I just don;t know that what you just communicated about your beliefs was instructive. 

I bet there;s a better way to communicate whatever it is you're trying to say.

I get that a lot :p

No, what you are doing is using you belief in an antithetical to say you don't believe in the antithesis to what you believe. I am not here to convince you of anything M8 

What the hell you on about?

Every person on earth has (a) bias(es) and not a single person is immune to it.

[The Grand Nudger]

Yeah, I can;t for the life of me understand why people saddle their religions with this sort of shit.  It can;t help...it can only hurt.  It;s high maintenance. I guess it might seem like a good idea..in the bubble of belief, but that comes off to me as remarkably short sighted.

What happens when a persons belief system is so intimately connected with a given bit of psuedo-science, that it being discredited creates an existential threat to the faith position?  I'd say our new friend CDF is what happens.

[CDF47]

Digital code in living systems = Design.  This is so obvious, I can't believe we are even discussing it.

It;s not...but why would it matter if it were?

It is true and it has great theological implications.

[The Grand Nudger]

It;s not, and it has none.

Would you like to know more?

[CDF47]

Digital code in living systems = Design.  This is so obvious, I can't believe we are even discussing it.

You can't even figure out how you're abusing the term digital yet you want us to take everything you say at face value. Fuck that!

Are you ever going to actually reply to any of the posts I've made beyond your one lame answer?

I can't respond to all the posts here.  It is digital.  It is a 4 digit digital code (not binary 0s and 1s).  Digital does not always mean binary.  Research Google for this.

[Quick]

Yeah, I can;t for the life of me understand why people saddle their religions with this sort of shit.  It can;t help...it can only hurt.  It;s high maintenance. I guess it might seem like a good idea..in the bubble of belief, but that comes off to me as remarkably short sighted.

What happens when a persons belief system is so intimately connected with a given bit of psuedo-science, that it being discredited creates an existential threat to the faith position?  I'd say our new friend CDF is what happens.

You are still trying to argue that that which is not rational has no basis in reality. I don't believe this as you do.

---

You can't even figure out how you're abusing the term digital yet you want us to take everything you say at face value. Fuck that!

Are you ever going to actually reply to any of the posts I've made beyond your one lame answer?

I can't respond to all the posts here.  It is digital.  It is a 4 digit digital code (not binary 0s and 1s).  Digital does not always mean binary.  Research Google for this.

You need to check urself B4 you wreck urself.

[CDF47]

Yeah, I can;t for the life of me understand why people saddle their religions with this sort of shit.  It can;t help...it can only hurt.  It;s high maintenance.  I guess it might seem like a good idea..in the bubble of belief, but that comes off to me as remarkably short sighted.

What happens when a persons belief system is so intimately connected with a given bit of psuedo-science, that it being discredited creates an existential threat to the faith position?  I'd say our new friend CDF is what happens.

You are still trying to argue that that which is not rational has no basis in reality. I don't believe this as you do.

---

I can't respond to all the posts here.  It is digital.  It is a 4 digit digital code (not binary 0s and 1s).  Digital does not always mean binary.  Research Google for this.

You need to check urself B4 you wreck urself.

OK

[The Grand Nudger]

Yeah, I can;t for the life of me understand why people saddle their religions with this sort of shit.  It can;t help...it can only hurt.  It;s high maintenance.  I guess it might seem like a good idea..in the bubble of belief, but that comes off to me as remarkably short sighted.

What happens when a persons belief system is so intimately connected with a given bit of psuedo-science, that it being discredited creates an existential threat to the faith position?  I'd say our new friend CDF is what happens.

You are still trying to argue that that which is not rational has no basis in reality. I don't believe this as you do.

I was actually responding to your comment about the silliness of some peoples religious beliefs...but...no, I;m not making any argument to that effect, at all.

I noted that -I- couldn;t believe what you believe based on your description of it, and, ofc, what that description lacked.  It;s not really a choice I make.

[Ravenshire]

You can't even figure out how you're abusing the term digital yet you want us to take everything you say at face value. Fuck that!

Are you ever going to actually reply to any of the posts I've made beyond your one lame answer?

I can't respond to all the posts here.  It is digital.  It is a 4 digit digital code (not binary 0s and 1s).  Digital does not always mean binary.  Research Google for this.

Have fun with this chew toy, guys. His willful ignorance and his refusal to actually engage with anyone is too much.