DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

Nobody cares about atheism is the point.  Only 3 percent.

The numbers don't matter and have no baring on validity argumentum ad populum.

---

I don't understand how in the 21st century any atheists can exist based on recent findings in science.

You don't understand a lot of things.

[surreptitious57]

I do not understand how in the 21st century any atheists can exist based on recent findings in science

Science only investigates observable phenomena and God is not observable
But just out of curiosity what recent findings were you actually referring to

[CDF47]

I do not understand how in the 21st century any atheists can exist based on recent findings in science

Science only investigates observable phenomena and God is not observable
But just out of curiosity what recent findings were you actually referring to

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/201...-atheists/

[surreptitious57]

Only 3.1 percent of Americans are atheists according to a 2014 Pew research poll

The non existence of God is not dependent on how many atheists there are. The popularity or non popularity of a belief has
absolutely no bearing on how true it is. To suggest that it has is to commit a logical fallacy namely argumentum ad populum

[CDF47]

Only 3.1 percent of Americans are atheists according to a 2014 Pew research poll

The non existence of God is not dependent on how many atheists there are. The popularity or non popularity of a belief has
absolutely no bearing on how true it is. To suggest that it has is to commit a logical fallacy namely argumentum ad populum

I agree with that.  Was just pointing out it is not as popular as made to seem.

[Amarok]

[url=http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/01/10-facts-about-atheists/][/url]

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/201...-atheists/

That proves fuck all 

[Anomalocaris]

I do not understand how in the 21st century any atheists can exist based on recent findings in science

Science only investigates observable phenomena and God is not observable
But just out of curiosity what recent findings were you actually referring to

Actually, if god were said to be unobservable all along, Christianity would have been merely total garbage, ie something with much better reputation than it has.

Christianity claimed all along that this and that are all menifestations of god, thus assertimgngod to be observable in order to steal observability from other phenomenon in order to aggrandize itself. Only when science made clear that all Christian assertions can be falsifiable, did Christianity per force retreat to “god is unobservable this not subject to falsification”.

All along Christianity has been singularly defined by its determination to lie, cheat, claim undeserved credit to the utmost extent possible under any contemporary zeitgeist in order to aggrandize itself.

[Amarok]

I agree with that.  Was just pointing out it is not as popular as made to seem.

It does not matter if it popular idiot .

[CDF47]

I agree with that.  Was just pointing out it is not as popular as made to seem.

It does not matter if it popular idiot .

Well, hardly anyone classifies themselves this way so it says at least that. It is great to see people can still see through the BS arguments thrown out by atheists.

[Amarok]

Well, hardly anyone classifies themselves this way so it says at least that.

It does not matter if it's popular .Thus your  whole post is meaningless .