DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

What is seen is an explosion of new life over that time period.

It's not new life. Every creature born still had parents and were still members of the same species.

Look how quickly humans have changed over a couple hundred thousand years. Imagine the changes after a million years or 20 million years.

It's all change. New life wasn't added. It wasn't created.

New life was created in the explosions.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

You're wasting your time.  It's been pointed out to him that the Tyre prophecy was not fulfilled, and he obstinately maintains that it was and that Tyre in fact "is no more."

Arguing with this dolt is a waste of time.

QFT.

[downbeatplumb]

It's not new life. Every creature born still had parents and were still members of the same species.

Look how quickly humans have changed over a couple hundred thousand years. Imagine the changes after a million years or 20 million years.

It's all change. New life wasn't added. It wasn't created.

New life was created in the explosions.

New species evolved. 
A process we understand. 
No god required.

[Peebothuhlu]

New life was created in the explosions.

Uhm....

So, it would appear you're now taking figuritive language literaly.

There were no 'Explosions'.

New life was, indeed, created. Though through the process of pairs of existing life rubbing themselves together in a very special way of which the outcome was a 'New', smaller, younger, not quite identical to either innitial 'Rubber'.


Hence it was through those incremental changes, both randomly chosen and randomly selevted for and against that, again over millions of years, lead to the myriad of new and different species.

You should watch Aron Ra's Youtube videos on the "Systematic Classification of Life." Very good, clear and concise.

Not at work.

[Bucky Ball]

The Lord will return.  The New Jerusalem is in heaven.

Yeah, and verily I say unto thee, the moon is made of green cheese. 

You idiots have been saying that for 2000 years. 
LOL

Speaking of FAILED prophesy :
"Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.“ (Matthew 16: 27, 28)

Yeah .... you got nothing.

---

It's not new life. Every creature born still had parents and were still members of the same species.

Look how quickly humans have changed over a couple hundred thousand years. Imagine the changes after a million years or 20 million years.

It's all change. New life wasn't added. It wasn't created.

New life was created in the explosions.

You FAILED to demonstrate your assertion .... it is therefore dismissed as bullshit. 
You peddle bullshit. 
You have no evidence.

It's hilarious, these idiots, when backed into a corner, can do nothing but Babble quotes and pious tripe.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

The Son of God broke the rules of physics.  He did this to show he was God (the Son).

So did Superman.  Do you know what else they have in common? They're both fictional (though you have to admit that Clark Kent is a role model to look up to far more regularly than Jesus).

And Sup's GF is way hotter than JC's.

[Angrboda]

Jesus fulfilled over 40 OT prophecies (https://jewsforjesus.org/answers/top-40-...rophecies/).

Jews For Jesus! Way to pick the worst possible source you can possibly pick! Jews pretty much unanimously reject the position of Jews For Jesus, that you would invoke them as evidence about old testament prophecies is hilarious!

[Bucky Ball]

It's not new life. Every creature born still had parents and were still members of the same species.

Look how quickly humans have changed over a couple hundred thousand years. Imagine the changes after a million years or 20 million years.

It's all change. New life wasn't added. It wasn't created.

New life was created in the explosions.

You forgot one thing there, bud.
The evidence.

Which species EXACTLY "appeared" and demonstrate for us how their DNA sequences were totally new, (in detail) and had never been seen before, and how you know this.
Take your time.

[Abaddon_ire]

New life was created in the explosions.

Uhm....

So, it would appear you're now taking figuritive language literaly.

There were no 'Explosions'.

New life was, indeed, created. Though through the process of pairs of existing life rubbing themselves together in a very special way of which the outcome was a 'New', smaller, younger, not quite identical to either innitial 'Rubber'.


Hence it was through those incremental changes, both randomly chosen and randomly selevted for and against that, again over millions of years, lead to the myriad of new and different species.

You should watch Aron Ra's Youtube videos on the "Systematic Classification of Life." Very good, clear and concise.

Not at work.

This is symptomatic of the god botherers. "The Big Bang was an explosion", they say, followed by "Explosions destroy things, therefore a god was required to fix that up"

"The Cambrian explosion poofed myriad lifeforms into existence instantaneously" they claim, ignoring that it wasn't instantaneous.

All this illustrates is that they are unable to distinguish the literal from the allegorical from the analogous from the metaphorical. One must therefore question how valid their biblical interpretations are given this obvious lack of discernment. 

If, as CDF seems to do, one accepts the BB and the Cambrian explosion and the biblical  accounts of the fall and Noah and so forth, one can only arrive at the conclusion that gunderscored actually actively hates all of the life he supposedly created. After all 99.9% of all species that ever existed have supposedly been wiped out by gunderscored over and over. What kind of all powerful deity just can't seem to get it right, ever?

[Deesse23]

All this illustrates is that they are unable to distinguish the literal from the allegorical from the analogous from the metaphorical.

Almost as if......they are used to read a book full with claims originally to be taken literal as long as people are ignorant, then somebody figures out that this claim is, in fact, untrue, so they chenge their view to an interpretation, metaphorical or as an allegory....anything that can keep them think their book is, in some way, correct, and then, looking back, they seemingly cant figure out anymore the differences of their previous held views about said thing.

Almost as if.