DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Whateverist]

So, how do you determine if this is true or not, what process did you use ?

Faith.  Thankfully, the Lord gave us the information in DNA to know a Creator exists to strengthen faith; especially for technical people like me.

If you're a 'technical person' gawd help us all.

[Anomalocaris]

Faith.  Thankfully, the Lord gave us the information in DNA to know a Creator exists to strengthen faith; especially for technical people like me.

If you're a 'technical person' gawd help us all.

He is technical in the Christian sense of knowing how to switch on the microphone for his preacher, and being able to count up to the number in the chapter and verse of the source of his confusion.

[Ravenshire]

By the way, thanks again to the moderators for allowing me to speak in this forum!  I was banned from another atheist forum in the past so it is good to be allowed to discuss these things with atheists here.

You're preaching, not discussing.

Were he actually engaging in discussion, he wouldn't be on my ignore list.

You have to give him credit for persistence in his willful ignorance, though.

[LastPoet]

Well, if nothing else, I appreciate that CDF has restrained his posting on this topic to a single thread.  He may be an accidental troll, but at least he is a well behaved one.

Indeed. He made this topic, stays in it and replies with what he has.

[Joods]

Still feeding the troll, I see.

[Abaddon_ire]

Still feeding the troll, I see.

OTOH it does illustrate how utterly bovine and dishonest the religionistas can be. 

As trolls go, CDF is merely amusing as opposed to irritating.

[Bucky Ball]

Matthew Henry .... nonconformist from the Seventeenth Century ? 
Are you fucking kidding me ? 

The FACT is, you take the other prophecies literally, and when it's convenient, you don't. 
 

"Stephen C. Meyer is an American advocate of the pseudoscientific principle of intelligent design. He helped found the Center for Science and Culture of the Discovery Institute, which is the main organization behind the intelligent design movement. Before joining the DI, Meyer was a professor at Whitworth College. Wikipedia

LMAO

Nice try attempting to discredit two excellent sources.

Nothing but your opinion.
Since you are an expert on nothing relevant, your recommendations of these two (debunked) writers, amounts to nothing.
Biblical Studies has come a long way since the 17th Century, (archaeology has pretty much debunked the entire OT as (non) "historical", in the post you copied, he said nothing that explains why the prophecy FAILED, ....  and ID is a very minor non-science that attempts to claim it can know something from an invalid premise.
YOU yourself cannot even define what is or is not "complex enough" to require a "god done it". You have been asked this time and again. You have no answer. You have failed here to support your theory. No one here buys this rubbish. .... We're STILL WAITING for you to show us what new DNA sequences arose in the Cambrian Explosion, and how it is you know they were "new life".

Here's what's wrong with Meyer : https://www.skepticblog.org/2013/08/28/s...n-follies/

Here's what's wrong with the childish nonsense of prophecy as prediction : http://www.crivoice.org/prophecyprediction.html

Prophecy was never intended to be set in stone, (despite what anal-retentive Fundamentalists say today).
Jeremiah 18:5-10. (This god reserves the right to change his mind, even after the prophet who speaks on God’s behalf predicts blessing or cursing).

"Then the word of the LORD came to me: Can I not do with you, O house of Israel, just as this potter has done? says the LORD. Just like the clay in the potter’s hand, so are you in my hand, O house of Israel. At one moment I may declare concerning a nation or a kingdom, that I will pluck up and break down and destroy it, but if that nation, concerning which I have spoken, turns from its evil, I will change my mind about the disaster that I intended to bring on it. And at another moment I may declare concerning a nation or a kingdom that I will build and plant it, but if it does evil in my sight, not listening to my voice, then I will change my mind about the good that I had intended to do to it ?"

There is no such thing as prediction of the future/omen reading (as forbidden in Deuteronomy), and there is no "proper way" to read any of it.

If you "know" a creator exists, then "technically" you don't need ANY faith. You can't have it both ways.
Either you "know" it, or you don't. If DNA proves a creator, then you need no faith.... (and) you are not saved, as according to Paul, you are save by your faith).
You're kinda screwed, I see.

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Faith.  Thankfully, the Lord gave us the information in DNA to know a Creator exists to strengthen faith; especially for technical people like me.

If you're a 'technical person' gawd help us all.

Technically, he is a person.

[CDF47]

Well, if nothing else, I appreciate that CDF has restrained his posting on this topic to a single thread.  He may be an accidental troll, but at least he is a well behaved one.

Thank you.  An accidental troll, LOL.  That is pretty funny.

---

Faith.  Thankfully, the Lord gave us the information in DNA to know a Creator exists to strengthen faith; especially for technical people like me.

If you're a 'technical person' gawd help us all.

I am pretty technical due to my background.

[Cod]

I am pretty technical due to my background.

What's your background if you don't mind me asking.