DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Bucky Ball]

It will always be a matter of using logic to determine how everything came to be and why we even exist at all.

According to which logic ? There are many logics, some of which, while being perfectly consistent according to their own rules, do not in fact, obtain in reality.
Of course, you know nothing about logic, (as you repeatedly employ fallacies from the logic you pretend to use, and in fact can't even name), nor can you name or discuss any of the logic systems. Your assumption that a logic system which appears to be consistent (intuitively correct) on a macro level, and has been proven to be inapplicable to ultimate reality, (uncertainty, relativity) .... is an unexamined false premise.

Sucks to be THAT ignorant.

[Angrboda]

To her complete ignorance of science, we can now add complete ignorance of comparative religion.

Oh really? As I have stated, Christians, Judaists, Muslims, Hindus, Jainists, Scientologists and most new agers (the vast majority of religious people in the world) all believe in Creator God, a soul that exists separately from the body, reward/redemption, and an afterlife in a heavenly type place. Also every religion has very similiar moral teachings and instructions.

The ignorance you spew on such basic facts makes it painful even to listen to your moronic crap. Hindus do not believe in a heavenly afterlife, in general[*].

* it's hard to generalize about Hindus because the term Hindu is an umbrella term which refers to a family of loosely related religions originating in the Indus valley.

[The Grand Nudger]

---

Then why do you feel the need to deny evolutionary biology?

I do not deny it. I am just not convinced by the evidence they have for one species turning into an entirely different species. I know the evidence you provided convinces you and a lot of other people and I think that's fine and you may very well be right. Time will tell.

Yes..yes...yes...we know.  You don't deny evolutionary biology, you just deny evolutionary biology.  

[Angrboda]

So repeating the same assertions and fallacies 

And you cannot prove me wrong about a single one of them

Nobody has to prove you wrong, you have to prove yourself right. Every word that drips from your lips points to the inevitable conclusion that you are incompetent and your conclusions ill considered.

[Bucky Ball]

As I have stated, Christians, Judaists, Muslims, Hindus, Jainists, Scientologists and most new agers (the vast majority of religious people in the world) all believe in Creator God, a soul that exists separately from the body, reward/redemption, and an afterlife in a heavenly type place. Also every religion has very similiar moral teachings and instructions.

And you'd be totally wrong about that. You're hardly an expert on anything, much less Comparative Religion.
You're STILL using the "ad populum" fallacy, while claiming to be logical. LOL Doh.
You have not one shred of evidence that worldwide, where almost ALL these "believers" you invoke, know virtually nothing about the religions they say they are associated with, or their histories have the same god(s) in common.
The fact is, the religion most people practice, they were BORN into, and mindlessly accepted.

[Angrboda]

I know God exists and so does 93% of the world. The additional clue will be here for those of you who are struggling and don't know how to apply logic.

Wrong. 93% believe that God exists (but not in the world*), but they don't know that God exists. We don't even know if that 93% would assert that they know that God exists with the same certitude that you do.

* Buddhists alone account for 7% of the world population, and while they may believe in gods, they do not believe in a god such as you do. I could figure out the actual percentage of people in the world who believe in a god, but given you will just follow this with more ignorance, assertion, denial and your special brand of "kicking ass and taking names" then I really can't be arsed.

[Paleophyte]

Everena: You are simply wrong. Brainwashed to an extreme. I know God exists beyond any and all doubt.

These two statements are hilariously ironic.

---

I think it is pretty obvious that people like you need the clue and I don't.

Ewww! Hubris and Judgementalism. I hope you have Karma Insurance because I think you have a broken enlightenment. On the bright side you won't be dying any time soon. Hopefully. Because if you do you're coming back as a three-legged zebra until you figure out why nature, red in tooth and claw, isn't the best argument for a merciful deity.

[Angrboda]

The sheer number of fallacious arguments you embrace is blatant proof that your belief in your ability to use reason and logic rests upon similar incompetence, and you are nothing but another Dunning-Kruger.  Far from being the special enlightened flower you believe yourself to be, every passing day simply provides another torrent of evidence that you are nothing more than a common, garden-variety dumbass.

And this from someone who can't apply easy logic and figure out that higher intelligence very obviously created the universe.

My competence in the realm of logic is well attested by others on this forum, as well as by others outside this forum.  It is also attested by my performance in many threads here.  Feel free to visit any of those threads and contest my logic if you're feeling randy.  Your incompetence on such matters is amply attested by the arguments you have embraced in this thread, and it doesn't require a Rhodes scholar to see that.  I accept that you are educated and perhaps even gifted. Whatever your talents, they do not appear to translate into competence in logic or in reasoning about the subjects under discussion.

Feel free to bring evidence to the contrary that isn't based solely in your unflagging confidence in your own beliefs.  I dare you.

[Rahn127]

She will never have any evidence for a god because my infinite space spores ate all the gods before time began.

It's so simple to assert things without any evidence.

[Anomalocaris]

I suspect she may have been in some gifted program in her youth.    She tasted that validation, liked it, and craves continuous validation .  But more validation against any meaningful standard has not been forthcoming because she is too indolent, wishthinking, obstinent, conceited or just straight up talentless.   So she manufactured her own certainties in order to credit herself with wisdom and clarity.  She became addicted to self-dealing her own validations to keep the buzz going.

But insecurity calls her to come here to try to browbeat others into acknowledging the validity of the certificates she dealt herself.   She is freaking out because her self dealt validations are not being recognized here.

Since her validation is made to order and self dealt, it can reference nothing.  So she has to resort to ever more strident repetitions of the same language she inscribed for herself on the certificate of validation she dealt herself.