Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 11:09 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 10 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Everena Wrote: And by that you mean you were completely wrong on all counts again. Yes, and thanks for playing.

All counts?

Your link is from a pop-science site that reviewed Penrose and Hameroff's review. It's doubly digested with no dissenting view. That's the equivalent of the National Enquirer.

Even there title was: "Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness" Note the quotes around microtubules and the word controversial.

Go find some real science.
No, it sure isn't. They publish what has happened in science recently. You are just not willing to face facts so you make up bullshit. Only your fellow atheists are dumb enough to believe crap like that.

(November 24, 2018 at 11:15 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
Quote:Science only attempts to discover and understand how an already existing and operating universe works.

You keep repeating this crap.
Science researches HOW things happen, and HOW they CAME TO BE in the state they are. ALL of evolution studies this.
You simple-minded nonsense is embarrassing yourself.

You never really took ANY science, did you.

Only in high school and college and when I studied it independently. You never took any school at all, did you?

(November 24, 2018 at 11:18 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:15 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: You keep repeating this crap.
Science researches HOW things happen, and HOW they CAME TO BE in the state they are. ALL of evolution studies this.
You simple-minded nonsense is embarrassing yourself.

You never really took ANY science, did you.

Not just that, she's fallen to copy-N-pasta of her own previously discredited posts.

What are you pretending to have discredited? Be specific.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Only in high school and college and when I studied it independently.

Oh, from Ken Ham ?

Still WAITING .... who proposed "the theory" that consciousness is received.
Still WAITING .... who is studying Penrose's theory at MIT.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:19 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
Quote:Additonally, why would we even have a sex drive or a will to live or an immune system? Just because of nothing and for no reason? How would nothingness care if our species survived?

Survival sweetie. You fundamentally know NOTHING about how evolution works

Holy shit. She's back to the "tasty plants".

LOL


Sweetie?  

I don’t know about you, but for me, even factoring out her delusions,  ignorances,  dishonesties, and hubris, she would still comfortably be in the top three of the most overbearing, rude, tactless, argumentative, fanatical, graceless, humorless, arrogant, generally comprehensively repugnant personalities I’ve ever encountered in any discussion forum.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:18 pm)Everena Wrote: That is just a list of people who have worked in neuroscience. The argument is about the decades they spent ignoring the subject of consciousness (which I already proved to you a lot of posts ago) Why you think this means anything I do not know. You are not even ever paying attention to what we are even discussing.

Well, there's the Journal of Neuroscience. It's been publishing on this topic for nearly half a century. Probably a few dozen similar journals that couldn't get that name.

Here's a link to the Google Scholar search for "Neural Correlates Consciousness" that calls bullshit on your assertion. Here's a lovely publication called "Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness" from 1990.

But please, keep telling us how nobody else was working on this subject. It gets funnier with every retelling.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:01 pm)Everena Wrote: And by that you mean you were completely wrong on all counts again. Yes, and thanks for playing.

All counts?

Your link is from a pop-science site that reviewed Penrose and Hameroff's review. It's doubly digested with no dissenting view. That's the equivalent of the National Enquirer.

Even there title was: "Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness" Note the quotes around microtubules and the word controversial.

Go find some real science.

It's real science. You just don't like that it doesn't agree with your twisted illogical worldview so you pretend it's not. Pathetic.

(November 24, 2018 at 11:33 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:18 pm)Everena Wrote: That is just a list of people who have worked in neuroscience. The argument is about the decades they spent ignoring the subject of consciousness (which I already proved to you a lot of posts ago) Why you think this means anything I do not know. You are not even ever paying attention to what we are even discussing.

Well, there's the Journal of Neuroscience. It's been publishing on this topic for nearly half a century. Probably a few dozen similar journals that couldn't get that name.

Here's a link to the Google Scholar search for "Neural Correlates Consciousness" that calls bullshit on your assertion. Here's a lovely publication called "Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness" from 1990.

But please, keep telling us how nobody else was working on this subject. It gets funnier with every retelling.
Neurobiology is not neuroscience
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Only your fellow atheists are dumb enough to believe crap like that.

Penrose is an atheist. You seem to keep forgetting that.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:36 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
Quote:Only your fellow atheists are dumb enough to believe crap like that.

Penrose is an atheist. You seem to keep forgetting that.

He doesn't believe in God but he does believe we have a soul and eternal life.

(November 24, 2018 at 11:19 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
Quote:Additonally, why would we even have a sex drive or a will to live or an immune system? Just because of nothing and for no reason? How would nothingness care if our species survived?

Survival sweetie. You fundamentally know NOTHING about how evolution works

Holy shit. She's back to the "tasty plants".

LOL

Evolution is a process that occured after life began, NOT a first cause. Grip reality.
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
Quote:Additonally, why would we even have a sex drive or a will to live or an immune system? Just because of nothing and for no reason? How would nothingness care if our species survived?

Sexual reproduction and immune systems evolved LONG before there was anything that even resembled homo sapiens.
I thought you said you studied science.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:34 pm)Everena Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:09 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: All counts?

Your link is from a pop-science site that reviewed Penrose and Hameroff's review. It's doubly digested with no dissenting view. That's the equivalent of the National Enquirer.

Even there title was: "Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness" Note the quotes around microtubules and the word controversial.

Go find some real science.

It's real science. You just don't like that it doesn't agree with your twisted illogical worldview so you pretend it's not. Pathetic.
Ooh! Call me "Sad" next!

No peer-review equals pop-sci rubbish. At least quote the scientific papers that your rubbish article cites. Seriously, is it that hard?

Quote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:33 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: Well, there's the Journal of Neuroscience. It's been publishing on this topic for nearly half a century. Probably a few dozen similar journals that couldn't get that name.

Here's a link to the Google Scholar search for "Neural Correlates Consciousness" that calls bullshit on your assertion. Here's a lovely publication called "Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness" from 1990.

But please, keep telling us how nobody else was working on this subject. It gets funnier with every retelling.

Neurobiology is not neuroscience

Seriously?!? Kindly demonstrate. Popcorn
Reply
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
(November 24, 2018 at 11:43 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:
(November 24, 2018 at 11:34 pm)Everena Wrote: It's real science. You just don't like that it doesn't agree with your twisted illogical worldview so you pretend it's not. Pathetic.
Ooh! Call me "Sad" next!

No peer-review equals pop-sci rubbish. At least quote the scientific papers that your rubbish article cites. Seriously, is it that hard?

Quote:Neurobiology is not neuroscience

Seriously?!? Kindly demonstrate. Popcorn
Sure, here's an article from a neuroscientist who will explain it to you   https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-differ...e-subjects

(November 24, 2018 at 11:34 pm)Everena Wrote: It's real science. You just don't like that it doesn't agree with your twisted illogical worldview so you pretend it's not. Pathetic.
(November 24, 2018 at 11:43 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: Ooh! Call me "Sad" next!

No peer-review equals pop-sci rubbish. At least quote the scientific papers that your rubbish article cites. Seriously, is it that hard?

Everena: They all have citations and links to the scientific journals they got their information from.

(November 24, 2018 at 11:41 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:
Quote:Additonally, why would we even have a sex drive or a will to live or an immune system? Just because of nothing and for no reason? How would nothingness care if our species survived?

Sexual reproduction and immune systems evolved LONG before there was anything that even resembled homo sapiens.
I thought you said you studied science.

And animals had sex drives and immune systems and the will to live long before that too genius.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Spontaneous assembly of DNA from precursor molecules prior to life. Anomalocaris 4 1193 April 4, 2019 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Music and DNA tahaadi 4 1588 September 29, 2018 at 4:35 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Dr. Long proves life after death or no? Manga 27 8214 April 27, 2017 at 4:59 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  "DNA Labelling!" aka American Idiots Davka 28 8508 February 4, 2015 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Aractus
  A new atheist's theories on meta-like physical existence freedeepthink 14 4302 October 1, 2014 at 1:35 am
Last Post: freedeepthink
  Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... Mudhammam 3 2355 January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Yeti DNA sequenced Doubting Thomas 2 1564 October 17, 2013 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Science Proves God Pahu 3 2139 August 2, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  New Human DNA Strain Detected Minimalist 10 5386 July 27, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Junk DNA and creationism little_monkey 0 2081 December 3, 2011 at 9:23 am
Last Post: little_monkey



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)