DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

The question is not, what are scientists speculating happened when this planet and some living organisms were here already.

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

You don't even know what a strawman fucking is.
No one disputes that evolution began after the planet existed. Doh. Are you really THAT stupid. 
There was nothing/no organisms to EAT this "food" of yours .. for 300 million years. Please stop embarrassing yourself. 
Tell us, what was "eating" these plants before there were animals around ? LOL
It was not food, until something appeared to EAT it. 

Jesus H Christ.

And by that you mean of course that you don't know what a strawman argument is.

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man."

[Bucky Ball]

A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man."

By that I mean is that YOU FAILED to address the fact that plants existed 300 million years before it became "food". 
Your claiming "strawman" IS a strawman. LOL

---

Everena's statement about evolution is false.
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics

[Everena]

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.

What is it that you think the consensus of Biology is regarding why food is on the planet you lowlife sexist moron? Keep in mind that science does not even attempt to answer the whys of our existence or the existence of food, but only attempts to discover how an already existing and operating universe works. So, please show me where you think Biology has answered my question. And not some other question you make up, by my question which is why does food exist on this planet at all? Can that just be written off to chance or luck and if so how in the world is that logically justified?

I'll be anxiously awaiting for your answer to that from Biology (forever)

[Nay_Sayer]

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

Sorry bimbo. Trying to drag the discussion back to your childish nonsense is not working for you.
The questions are NOT what you are so ignorantly asking. NO SCIENTIST asks the crap questions you ask.
The fact is plants were on land 300 million years before animals.

If you have any scientific evidence that refutes the consensus of Biology, let's have it. Now.

What is it that you think the consensus of Biology is regarding why food is on the planet you lowlife sexist moron? Keep in mind that science does not even attempt to answer the whys of our existence or the existence of food, but only attempts to discover how an already existing and operating universe works. So, please show me where you think Biology has answered my question. And not some other question you make up, by my question which is why does food exist on this planet at all? Can that just be written off to chance or luck and if so how in the world is that logically justified?

I'll be anxiously awaiting for your answer to that from Biology (forever)

Fact: All species of beetles are edible.

[Everena]

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy. Are you really going to pretend that was just our good luck? And no more strawman arguments.

Food is living organisms. Species that require food are also living organisms. All living organisms are the result of evolution. That some species feed on others is the result evolution, environment and adaptation. Got it yet?

I said no more strawman arguments. You did not answer the question I asked. Get that yet?

---

This was a scientific thread with religious implications.  Then I was asked religious questions which is understandable.

What is it that you think the consensus of Biology is regarding why food is on the planet you lowlife sexist moron? Keep in mind that science does not even attempt to answer the whys of our existence or the existence of food, but only attempts to discover how an already existing and operating universe works. So, please show me where you think Biology has answered my question. And not some other question you make up, by my question which is why does food exist on this planet at all? Can that just be written off to chance or luck and if so how in the world is that logically justified?

I'll be anxiously awaiting for your answer to that from Biology (forever)

Fact: All species of beetles are edible.

And that is just more proof that Higher intelligence was involved in the creation of our planet. Animals that die are even food for us in case we need it to stay alive.

[Bucky Ball]

I'll be anxiously awaiting for your answer to that from Biology (forever)

Sorry dumbass, but (obviously) your statement about "why" is another strawman. Science also wants to know HOW things came to be the way they are, which you have been told BEFORE here.
Again your simple-minded (false) dichotomy forces you to MISS the point. Evolutionary Biology ... that's a little hint for snookums ..... HOW did the species on the planet evolve ? 
Biology has no position on "food on the planet" as the phrase is so monumentally moronic, no one would even THINK of addressing your idiotic uninformed question. 
Biology DOES have mountains of evidence that plants evolved on Earth before there were any animals to eat them ... thus making your stupid question totally irrelevant.

[LadyForCamus]

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy.

LOL, what?! That question is so idiotic, I think Huggy would laugh.

[Everena]

I'll be anxiously awaiting for your answer to that from Biology (forever)

Sorry dumbass, but (obviously) your statement about "why" is another strawman. Science also wants to know HOW things came to be the way they are, which you have been told BEFORE here.
Again your simple-minded (false) dichotomy forces you to MISS the point. Evolutionary Biology ... that's a little hint for snookums ..... HOW did the species on the planet evolve ? 
Biology has no position on "food on the planet" as the phrase is so monumentally moronic, no one would even THINK of addressing your idiotic uninformed question. 
Biology DOES have mountains of evidence that plants evolved on Earth before there were any animals to eat them ... thus making your stupid question totally irrelevant.

I know it makes you sad because it's a complete and utter fail for atheism. Boo Hoo.

---

False: Evolution is a process that began after the planet already existed, and the question was:
Why does food exist on this planet in the first place? Food to feed the 8.7 million species of life. Food that not only tastes good, but that provides us nutrients and energy.

LOL, what?!  That question is so idiotic, I think Huggy would laugh.

So you're admitting that you are too dumb to come up with an answer.

[Bucky Ball]

I know it makes you sad because it's a complete and utter fail for atheism. Boo Hoo.

And snookums would be 110 % wrong, as usual.
That's called a non-sequitur, snookums.
There being no answer to stupid questions is not in any way related to the gods.
Do you have to call for help putting your socks on in the morning ?

[Everena]

[size=medium][size=medium]And it is impossible for the complex code of DNA to have just created itself from nothing with no intelligence. Recently, scientists discovered a second language written on top of the original language discovered that is responsible for controlling our genes. Who knows what they will discover next? [color=#336699]https://www.washington.edu/news/2013/12/...etic-code/

The article says nothing about DNA code requiring intelligence to have evolved.

The point is clear. Scientists have now discovered a second language, that they never even knew existed, written in our dna, instructing our genes what to do. It is very obvious that that level of complexity would not just happen without conscious intelligence being involved in the creation of life. And who knows what they will discover about our DNA next? It could potentially be even more complex than what they already are aware of and what they are already aware of is the most complex code in the entire universe. Nothingness or an inaminate object could no way possibly ever have been responsible for creating DNA. And it is a complete and utter fail for atheism as well.