DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[fredd bear]

To be fair ire, the fine print of the babble does say:
And goeth and maketh thine shit upeth as thee go alongeth.

My favourite, is a great insult I've used many times :" Go ye forth and multiply", it comes from the same part of the bible you just quoted 

[Abaddon_ire]

To be fair ire, the fine print of the babble does say:
And goeth and maketh thine shit upeth as thee go alongeth.

Yea, verily.

[CDF47]

No amount of accepting that the earth hi is billions of years old and life as billions of years old will change the fact that the adam and eve narrative is non factual.  Further, old earth creationism will not be able to make it's "days" consistent, and will not be able to make it's "days" match with observed reality on top of that.  Nothing happened the way the authors of magic book wrote it, they had no idea how any of it happened, and they had no means to come to such an idea in the first place.  Any human being with two brain cells to rub together ought to realize that the authors of magic book getting that one wrong is about as surprising as a toddler not where knowing silicon chips come from or how to manufacture a cpu.  

Worshipping magic book and worshipping a god are fundamentally at odds on this count.  No amount of negotiating with reality by accepting one fact while denying another (or, in this case, a whole raft of others) will change that a god made you from monkeys, if a god made you at all.  Your rejection of that god on those grounds of dissatisfaction is no more an argument in favor of your beliefs than it would be an argument in favor of an atheists lack thereof.

Again, it is highly disputed that we came from monkeys. In fact, the fossil record shows explosions of new living systems rather than very slow gradual change over time. There is some minor change over time with mutations but not common ancestry with monkeys.

---

I don't think he cares about the replies, guys. By my experience, it's better just to leave him on a monologue. CDF is the kind of guy that likes to hear his own voice, or in this venue, to read his own posts. Can we please not feed him? Its not worth it anymore.

Hell, Even by my mantra "others might learn interesting stuff", it is so big of a dumbassery, that no one will be able to cone through this thread for any information.

The title should be "CDF is proof of gods stupidity"

That's fine, you can quit the debate.

[fredd bear]

@CDF47

Again, it is highly disputed that we came from monkeys. In fact, the fossil record shows explosions of new living systems rather than very slow gradual change over time. There is some minor change over time with mutations but not common ancestry with monkeys.

Oh for goodness sake. don't want to accept evolution? No problem , your right. However, if you are going to attempt to debunk an accepted scientific principle, do yourself a favour; try actually reading a bit about evolution. "The Voyage Of The Beagle" is pretty easy to read, and probably in the public domain. You can probably get it for nothing, in pdf form from"The Internet Archive"

I say "do yourself a favour" because if you actually know what you are talking about, you will be less likely to make statements such as the one quoted above. It makes you come across as ignorant and possibly stupid. That means zero credibility.


To explain why:

Neither Darwin nor any other knowledgable person has ever claimed humans are descended from monkeys. They DO say, that we had a common ancestor, which is not the same thing.

Nor are human beings descended from apes. We are primates, which means a species of ape. We are not descended FROM apes. We ARE apes.

Evolution is NOT 'highly disputed", but a fully accepted part of mainstream science. Again,PLEASE do some bloody reading, then you may not seem quite so ignorant.

[The Grand Nudger]

Again, it is highly disputed that we came from monkeys. In fact, the fossil record shows explosions of new living systems rather than very slow gradual change over time. There is some minor change over time with mutations but not common ancestry with monkeys.

Saying something over and over won't make it any more true or less false than it was the first time.

You don't like the idea of "coming from monkeys".  If that's how a god did that, then fuck that god.  You reject it's work and reject that god in favor of an imaginary god that made you some other way.

[CDF47]

@CDF47

Again, it is highly disputed that we came from monkeys. In fact, the fossil record shows explosions of new living systems rather than very slow gradual change over time. There is some minor change over time with mutations but not common ancestry with monkeys.

Oh for goodness sake. don't want to accept evolution? No problem , your right. However, if you are going to attempt  to debunk an accepted scientific principle, do yourself a favour; try actually reading a bit about evolution. "The Voyage Of  The Beagle" is pretty easy to read, and probably in the public domain. You can probably get it for nothing, in pdf form from"The Internet Archive"

I say "do yourself a favour" because if you actually know what you are talking about, you will be less likely to make statements such as the one quoted above. It makes you come across as ignorant and possibly stupid. That means zero credibility.


To explain why:

Neither Darwin nor any other knowledgable person has ever claimed humans are descended from monkeys.  They DO say, that we had a common ancestor, which is not the same thing.

Nor are human beings descended from apes.  We are primates, which means a species of ape. We are not descended FROM apes. We ARE apes.

Evolution is NOT 'highly disputed", but a fully accepted part of mainstream science. Again,PLEASE do some bloody reading, then you may not seem quite so ignorant.

I believe the information you are trying to push off as fact is highly disputed.

[The Grand Nudger]

You believe alot of silly things.

[CDF47]

Again, it is highly disputed that we came from monkeys. In fact, the fossil record shows explosions of new living systems rather than very slow gradual change over time. There is some minor change over time with mutations but not common ancestry with monkeys.

Saying something over and over won't make it any more true or less false than it was the first time.

You don't like the idea of "coming from monkeys".  If that's how a god did that, then fuck that god.  You reject it's work and reject that god in favor of an imaginary god that made you some other way.

That's not how He did it though. There were explosions of new living systems, not slow gradual morphing into new types of living systems.

---

You believe alot of silly things.

No, I don't.  We share many of the same beliefs related to science.  Only difference between us is I see proof of design and you are blind to it.  That and I don't believe in a common ancestor with monkeys or apes.  I believe that is highly disputed.  I also don't believe in any multiverse. There is no good evidence for one.  Just a made up hypothesis and theory.

[The Grand Nudger]

You believe alot of silly things, again.

[no one]

The CDFster saying there isn't good evidence for something, may just be the funniest thing I've ever heard in my life.