DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

It appears that some people do not understand that there is a perfectly good way for things to become both complex and functional without being designed.

Here is a simple example.

Working out the most efficient way to link points is something that can take some very fact computers a while to do.

For example the most efficient way to link the cities of England is not just straight lines between each city but branching at points along the way.

Now the fastest way yo find out the most efficient road system is to hammer nails into a board in the positions of the cities leaving a fair amount of nail sticking out. Put the board in some soapy water and take out. Surface tension would have produced the most efficient system in basically soap bubbles.

Complex, functional with basic physics.

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

---

Maybe the CDFSTER received its "degree" from the same esteemed university where Kent Hovind learned his sciencey stuff.

Not quite. I went to a good University. Very difficult. 67 percent drop out rate. ABET certified of course.

[Amarok]

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

Actually it is 

Not quite. I went to a good University. Very difficult. 67 percent drop out rate. ABET certified of course.

Uh huh whatever you say

[Abaddon_ire]

It appears that some people do not understand that there is a perfectly good way for things to become both complex and functional without being designed.

Here is a simple example.

Working out the most efficient way to link points is something that can take some very fact computers a while to do.

For example the most efficient way to link the cities of England is not just straight lines between each city but branching at points along the way.

Now the fastest way yo find out the most efficient road system is to hammer nails into a board in the positions of the cities leaving a fair amount of nail sticking out. Put the board in some soapy water and take out. Surface tension would have produced the most efficient system in basically soap bubbles.

Complex, functional with basic physics.

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

---

Maybe the CDFSTER received its "degree" from the same esteemed university where Kent Hovind learned his sciencey stuff.

Not quite. I went to a good University. Very difficult. 67 percent drop out rate. ABET certified of course.

I don't believe you. Your track record of willingness to tell outright lies means that NOBODY will take you at your word because your word has no value.

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1911445' dateline='1558640224']
It appears that some people do not understand that there is a perfectly good way for things to become both complex and functional without being designed.

Here is a simple example.

Working out the most efficient way to link points is something that can take some very fact computers a while to do.

For example the most efficient way to link the cities of England is not just straight lines between each city but branching at points along the way.

Now the fastest way yo find out the most efficient road system is to hammer nails into a board in the positions of the cities leaving a fair amount of nail sticking out. Put the board in some soapy water and take out. Surface tension would have produced the most efficient system in basically soap bubbles.

Complex, functional with basic physics.

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

---

But it is complex and functional without a designer.

This exactly disproves your one and only point.

[Gwaithmir]

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

For which you STILL have not provided any proof or evidence that it is not simply the end result of biochemistry and natural selection. Here's the real science, numb nuts. Get an education!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_DNA_evolution

[Mister Agenda]

Maybe it would have been more precise to summarize the thread as:

CDF47: DNA is designed, and this is why I think so.
All: Your reasoning does not support that conclusion, and this is why.
CDF47: I did so prove it and I know design when I see it!

And DNA is still not literally a code, and when you're arguing about whether it's designed, it's important to make fine distinctions. The code thing is an analogy. DNA is like a code in some ways, unlike a code in others.

[Gwaithmir]

Maybe it would have been more precise to summarize the thread as:

CDF47: DNA is designed, and this is why I think so.
All: Your reasoning does not support that conclusion, and this is why.
CDF47: I did so prove it and I know design when I see it!

And DNA is still not literally a code, and when you're arguing about whether it's designed, it's important to make fine distinctions. The code thing is an analogy. DNA is like a code in some ways, unlike a code in others.

CDF47 does not learn because he does not WANT to learn. He displays his ignorance as a badge of pride.

[CDF47]

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

---

Not quite. I went to a good University. Very difficult. 67 percent drop out rate. ABET certified of course.

I don't believe you. Your track record of willingness to tell outright lies means that NOBODY will take you at your word because your word has no value.

Point to one post where I lied.

---

[quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1911445' dateline='1558640224']
It appears that some people do not understand that there is a perfectly good way for things to become both complex and functional without being designed.

Here is a simple example.

Working out the most efficient way to link points is something that can take some very fact computers a while to do.

For example the most efficient way to link the cities of England is not just straight lines between each city but branching at points along the way.

Now the fastest way yo find out the most efficient road system is to hammer nails into a board in the positions of the cities leaving a fair amount of nail sticking out. Put the board in some soapy water and take out. Surface tension would have produced the most efficient system in basically soap bubbles.

Complex, functional with basic physics.

That is nothing compared to the code embedded inside of DNA.

---

But it is complex and functional without a designer.

This exactly disproves your one and only point.

It's designed obviously. Yes, that is one point of proof God gave us for His existence. He also fine-tuned the universe.

---

Maybe it would have been more precise to summarize the thread as:

CDF47: DNA is designed, and this is why I think so.
All: Your reasoning does not support that conclusion, and this is why.
CDF47: I did so prove it and I know design when I see it!

And DNA is still not literally a code, and when you're arguing about whether it's designed, it's important to make fine distinctions. The code thing is an analogy. DNA is like a code in some ways, unlike a code in others.

The genetic code operates just like a code to construct proteins.

[The Grand Nudger]

Pointing to places where you've lied doesn't actually stop you from asking people to point to places where you've lied.  Get right with jesus you liar, lol.

[downbeatplumb]

[quote='Abaddon_ire' pid='1911561' dateline='1558689402']

I don't believe you. Your track record of willingness to tell outright lies means that NOBODY will take you at your word because your word has no value.

Point to one post where I lied.

---

But it is complex and functional without a designer.

This exactly disproves your one and only point.

It's designed obviously. Yes, that is one point of proof God gave us for His existence. He also fine-tuned the universe.

Interesting that despite your specific point being categorically shown to be wrong you just double down.

Again.