Oh My....Another Xtian Wetdream Collapses In A Puddle Of Piss

[Minimalist]

https://www.bricecjones.com/blog/the-sec...st-century

The Secret Is Out: “First Century Mark” is not from the First Century

Well, it has been six years since the announcement that an apparent first century fragment of Mark's Gospel had been discovered, a topic of debate that I have followed closely since the news first broke. It was announced by Dan Wallace during a debate with Bart Ehrman back in 2012. Following the announcement, the academic community began to scratch its head: Where is this fragment? Who owns it? Who has dated it? Is it being published? If so, where is it being published?

Today, Elijah Hixson posted a blog post over on the Evangelical Textual Criticism blog about a Markan fragment that is to appear as no. 5345 in the 83rd volume of the Oxyrhynchus Papyri series. The initial post questions whether or not this fragment is the same fragment as the so-called “first century fragment of Mark.”

Dan Wallace, who first announced the discovery of this fragment, has finally broken his silence and responded to Hixson’s post, verifying that P.Oxy. 83.5345 is indeed the fragment he was referring to back in 2012. Significantly, this fragment has now officially been dated to the second/third century, as indicated in a draft of the publication shown on the ETC blog.

Poor xhristards.  Archaeology keeps sticking its dick up their asses!

[brewer]

They still have those pyramid grain storage bins.

[Chad32]

So Mark, which the other gospels are based on, didn't even come out i the same century as Jesus was supposed to live. That doesn't look good for the bible's accuracy.

[Minimalist]

Xhristards have been searching for real evidence of an early date for their fucking bullshit.  Obviously they are not above lying for jebus.  

So this chart remains accurate!




And the fuckers hate it!

[RoadRunner79]

So Mark, which the other gospels are based on, didn't even come out i the same century as Jesus was supposed to live. That doesn't look good for the bible's accuracy.

Where do you get that?

[Amarok]

And now Road begins his apologist hysterics. But people would have noticed Min people would have noticed

[Minimalist]

If you'd get your face out of your fucking bible once in a while you might learn something.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

Marcan priority, the hypothesis that the Gospel of Mark was the first-written of the three Synoptic Gospels and was used as a source by the other two (Matthew and Luke) is a central element in discussion of the synoptic problem – the question of the documentary relationship among these three Gospels.

Most scholars since the late nineteenth century have accepted the concept of Marcan priority.

In short, Matty and Lukey copied their bullshit from Markie and when Markie was silent on a subject they wanted to address they made up their own bullshit which is how we end up with absurdly contradictory nativity accounts since Markie did not address that particular piece of the story.

[Amarok]

If you'd get your face out of your fucking bible once in a while you might learn something.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

Marcan priority, the hypothesis that the Gospel of Mark was the first-written of the three Synoptic Gospels and was used as a source by the other two (Matthew and Luke) is a central element in discussion of the synoptic problem – the question of the documentary relationship among these three Gospels.

Most scholars since the late nineteenth century have accepted the concept of Marcan priority.

In short, Matty and Lukey copied their bullshit from Markie and when Markie was silent on a subject they wanted to address they made up their own bullshit which is how we end up with absurdly contradictory nativity accounts since Markie did not address that particular piece of the story.

That would require thinking and unmotivated reasoning. Those are to a theist what garlic is to a vampire .

[RoadRunner79]

---

If you'd get your face out of your fucking bible once in a while you might learn something.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority



In short, Matty and Lukey copied their bullshit from Markie and when Markie was silent on a subject they wanted to address they made up their own bullshit which is how we end up with absurdly contradictory nativity accounts since Markie did not address that particular piece of the story.

That would require thinking and unmotivated reasoning. Those are to a theist what garlic is to a vampire .

---

Yes, I'm looking for the evidence, and reasoning behind the statement. Do you have that, or do you just appeal to authority; and take it on faith ( as long as they tell you what you want to hear) similar to Min?

[Chad32]

So Mark, which the other gospels are based on, didn't even come out i the same century as Jesus was supposed to live. That doesn't look good for the bible's accuracy.

Where do you get that?

Yeah, what Min says. Mark was the oldest gospel. Not sure if that means the earlies book in the new testament, but since the gospels talk about the story of Jesus, then they should have been written during or right after his life to be the most accurate.