The myth of atheist core believe.

[Joods]

I get the sense the OP is a very angry person who just needed to find a bunch of people to take his aggression out on.

What a shame.

[unsapien]

---

No links for noobs, 30/30 rule. Tell us where to find it with no link.

Oh so people get away with your lies because I'm a new poster. I guess its impossible to get something trough to you because you are too big for a new poster. Guess I should take the truth somewhere else because atheist are too big for the truth.

You'd think the religious would appreciate rules, they make so damn many of them.

Noob rules apply to us all, I've got 17 more days in the noob clink myself before I can Link, then Ima find me a princess!

[vulcanlogician]

I have three items to communicate to you:

1) I always try to give new people a fair shake. By page 3 of this thread, that ship has already sailed. You have already demonstrated intellectual dishonesty. No point in a conversation with you.

2) Paragraphs, motherfucka! Even if you are a worthless troll, paragraphs will help you organize and articulate your worthless troll ideas more clearly. When people tell you to use paragraphs, they are trying to help you.

3) Go to church! If you want people to nod their heads in agreement with your shitty arguments, go to a church and spout them. So long as God is the conclusion, nobody will call you out on false premises or faulty logic.

Haha you cannot bypass the logic troll. You didn't give me a fair shake just because of paragraphs. Go to another thread and read them I will not chew your food for you. Do something useful with your life.

I actually did give you a fair shake. You blew it. Not because you failed to use paragraphs-- rather (as I said before) because you demonstrated intellectual dishonesty. The paragraphs thing has nothing to do with your fair shake. It was just a bit of secondary advice.

You've already misrepresented my words. It's clear for anyone to see. The question is: did you intentionally misrepresent my words?

If you didn't intentionally distort my meaning, can you see how I figure that you must have unintentionally did so?

If you can answer those two questions honestly, I'll take another stab at taking you seriously. How's that sound?

[robvalue]

I'll ask the question I always ask, which cuts through all this business:

What does it matter if there is a "God" or not?

If you can’t answer this simple question Lion, the whole discussion is entirely academic.

I’ll give you one more chance.

[LastPoet]

I sense a "soul" that wants no answers.

[Kitan Etos]

I sense a "soul" that wants no answers.

They rarely do, considering they think they already know the only answer subjectively worth accepting.

[robvalue]

[Joods]

Okay, who is this?

Clearly no one important.

[Minimalist]

[brewer]

You just keep getting funnier and funnier.

---

Gosh, you're so important that rules don't apply to you. What the hell were we thinking?

30/30 is a made up rule. If you want to argue the topic then read it and reply to it. It's also common courtesy to stay on topic on forums. Not just this 30/30 nonesense. And you're making yourself look important  by ignoring noobs. Get real.

Then present the topic in a rational form, not in a wall of text. And include some proof as evidence that it's not all just your conjecture. 

If you feel that your position has any real validity then you'd follow the forum rule, do the 30/30, and continue to present you case.