Its not so anti female as i thought it would be?
August 8, 2018 at 3:05 am
(This post was last modified: August 8, 2018 at 3:06 am by Rufun83.)
Context to beating females
"Sulaiman bin Amr bin Al-Ahwas said:
“My father narrated to me that he witnessed the farewell Hajj with the Messenger of Allah. So he thanked and praised Allah and he reminded and gave admonition. He mentioned a story in his narration and he (the Prophet) said: “And indeed I order you to be good to the women, for they are but captives with you over whom you have no power than that, except if they come with manifest Fahishah (evil behavior). If they do that, then abandon their beds and beat them with a beating that is not harmful. And if they obey you then you have no cause against them. Indeed you have rights over your women, and your women have rights over you. As for your rights over your women, then they must not allow anyone whom you dislike to treat on your bedding (furniture), nor to admit anyone in your home that you dislike. And their rights over you are that you treat them well in clothing them and feeding them.”
"
Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1163
So i dont see the problem to correct someone if they act annoying or insanely rude?. But it says you should treat your captives or females with goodness since its the fullfilment of faith.
So yeah i was wrong, i dont see anything wrong with this. I mean the only people i think would object to it is beta males or degenerates. But just curious?
For example in context, most women who are in hell are because they are ungrateful to their husband not because they themself are bad. If they are good they essentially go to paradise from what i know
"Sulaiman bin Amr bin Al-Ahwas said:
“My father narrated to me that he witnessed the farewell Hajj with the Messenger of Allah. So he thanked and praised Allah and he reminded and gave admonition. He mentioned a story in his narration and he (the Prophet) said: “And indeed I order you to be good to the women, for they are but captives with you over whom you have no power than that, except if they come with manifest Fahishah (evil behavior). If they do that, then abandon their beds and beat them with a beating that is not harmful. And if they obey you then you have no cause against them. Indeed you have rights over your women, and your women have rights over you. As for your rights over your women, then they must not allow anyone whom you dislike to treat on your bedding (furniture), nor to admit anyone in your home that you dislike. And their rights over you are that you treat them well in clothing them and feeding them.”
"
Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1163
So i dont see the problem to correct someone if they act annoying or insanely rude?. But it says you should treat your captives or females with goodness since its the fullfilment of faith.
So yeah i was wrong, i dont see anything wrong with this. I mean the only people i think would object to it is beta males or degenerates. But just curious?
For example in context, most women who are in hell are because they are ungrateful to their husband not because they themself are bad. If they are good they essentially go to paradise from what i know