Cosby Sentence

[Joods]

bold mine. 

LOL Imma remind you again of your credibility regarding sources. It's ZERO. You lost all rights to be mad when someone else questions your "sources" considering that 99% of the time they:

1. aren't relevant or;
2. are from other nations AND;
3. are biased towards your own agenda.

Well seeing how Cosby was convicted in a Pennsylvanian court room, Is this source acceptable?
https://atheistforums.org/thread-40199-p...pid1150458

Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go.

Or how about CNN?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/17/cosby/index.html

In a press release posted on its Web site, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor said he "finds insufficient, credible and admissible evidence exists upon which any charge against Mr. Cosby could be sustained beyond a reasonable doubt.

Fail. Resorting to quote mining something I said years ago, won't help you now. Not to mention that anyone reading why I said that would easily know that I was talking about Family courts and NOT criminal courts. Fool. Keep on being dishonest. Number 3 rings true for you.

Ohhh so CNN grabbed something off of a government website, something anyone can do. One statement doesn't make an entire case, bud.

[Rev. Rye]

Or this will do nothing and you will still look like a tool defending a serial rapist based on nothing more then your wishful thinking and indeed this thread will not age well but not for us .

Even if the sources say exactly what Huggy Bear says of them, and the interpretations he makes of them are valid, this does not necessarily mean he’s innocent; at best, he got off due to a legal technicality. We’ve still got an alarming amount of evidence that he was/is a sexual predator, including his own words in the deposition mentioned in the article. If nobody’s going to stand in the gap, that’s mainly because all the 60 other cases let the statute of limitations lapse.

If Cosby wins this case, it can only be a phyrric victory; he’s a pariah, and he’s still left an alarmingly long paper trail of evidence that, if acted upon in a timely fashion, should have put him in jail decades ago.

[brewer]

[Huggy Bear]

Well seeing how Cosby was convicted in a Pennsylvanian court room, Is this source acceptable?
https://atheistforums.org/thread-40199-p...pid1150458

Or how about CNN?
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/17/cosby/index.html

Fail. Resorting to quote mining something I said years ago, won't help you now. Not to mention that anyone reading why I said that would easily know that I was talking about Family courts and NOT criminal courts. Fool. Keep on being dishonest. Number 3 rings true for you.

Ohhh so CNN grabbed something off of a government website, something anyone can do. One statement doesn't make an entire case, bud.

*emphasis mine*

No, the fail is not learning how to properly punctuate.

A PERIOD is used to separate one statement from another.

Money talks I guess. He who has the bigger bank account wins in family court. Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go. There is no justice for good parents living here. Look at what's been done already. And sadly, I'm not the only parent who's been screwed over this way.

The above post reads more like...

Money talks I guess.

He who has the bigger bank account wins in family court.

Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go.

There is no justice for good parents living here.

Look at what's been done already.

And sadly, I'm not the only parent who's been screwed over this way.

If you had used a comma then maybe you can claim you were talking about family courts.

He who has the bigger bank account wins in family court, Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go.

*edited for educational purposes*

But you didn't, you stated that

"Pennsylvania is the fifth most corrupt state in the US as far as courts go."

Which is it's own separate statement due to YOUR use of a period.

[Joods]

Dumb ass - a paragraph is about one subject. If you want to change that subject, then you start a new paragraph. Clearly in the paragraph, I was talking about family court.

I'm not playing semantics with you. You're a fucking idiot and I don't have to prove myself to you.

[Huggy Bear]

Ok sweet pea...

As if that small ass post could be considered a paragraph on it's own, let alone be split into two...

[Shell B]

In context, that was undoubtedly in reference to family court. Every sentence after was about parents. That said, it’s worth seeing if the same is true for criminal courts for the sake of argument.

[Rev. Rye]

And now for something more accurate to the show:





Though why Cosby's taking his style cues from Adebisi (right down to that gravity-defying touque) is a question for the ages.

---

Maybe they're just setting up a scene where Not-Kareem Said from the bathroom scene kills him:

---

[Joods]

In context, that was undoubtedly in reference to family court. Every sentence after was about parents. That said, it’s worth seeing if the same is true for criminal courts for the sake of argument.

I would totally be on board with that.

[Amarok]

Huggy taking someone out of context that's