Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 30, 2024, 2:06 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
#21
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
I find it strange that suspected sexism is remedied with definite sexism.

Just for the sake of ridiculousness, what happens if no women want to do the job at all? Will there be two empty seats? Or will women be forced to do the job at gunpoint?

(October 2, 2018 at 4:12 pm)epronovost Wrote:
(October 2, 2018 at 1:14 am)robvalue Wrote: Fuck all this forced diversity. As my hero Noel Plum point out: no one is trying to make sure lots of men go into nursing. They don't give a shit.

[Image: wcf_e_a001084366.jpg]

Apparently you are wrong on this point. There has also been tuition offered for men to join nursing and teaching. Of course area of high power and authority are more frequently subject to debates on gender representation because women as a class of people are concerned about their cultural, economical and political influence on our societies.

Ahah, I stand corrected! I wasn’t aware of this.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#22
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 3:19 pm)robvalue Wrote: I find it strange that suspected sexism is remedied with definite sexism.

Just for the sake of ridiculousness, what happens if no women want to do the job at all? Will there be two empty seats? Or will women be forced to do the job at gunpoint?

Is it wrong that I think about opportunities for deaf mutes?
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#23
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.


(October 3, 2018 at 3:27 pm)wyzas Wrote:
(October 3, 2018 at 3:19 pm)robvalue Wrote: I find it strange that suspected sexism is remedied with definite sexism.

Just for the sake of ridiculousness, what happens if no women want to do the job at all? Will there be two empty seats? Or will women be forced to do the job at gunpoint?

Is it wrong that I think about opportunities for deaf mutes?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#24
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 3:19 pm)robvalue Wrote: I find it strange that suspected sexism is remedied with definite sexism.

Just for the sake of ridiculousness, what happens if no women want to do the job at all? Will there be two empty seats? Or will women be forced to do the job at gunpoint?

I know, right? I mean, what woman would want to worry her pretty little head with running a company, for Pete's sake. Leave that to the men! Their wives can stay home with the children, which is exactly what they secretly want anyway.

-Teresa
.
Reply
#25
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 1, 2018 at 4:56 pm)wyzas Wrote: "By the end of July 2021, a minimum of two women must sit on boards with five members, and there must be at least three women on boards with six or more members."

Gov Brown states "...recent events in Washington, D.C. — and beyond — make it crystal clear that many are not getting the message."

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-c...story.html#

I fail to see the logic other than misguided forced diversity. This is not something that should be legislated. Maybe I'm just a C. Pig.

What say you?



Yeah baby, by fricking law!  Yay California.  (Did not know that.)

(October 3, 2018 at 5:52 pm)Tres Leches Wrote:
(October 3, 2018 at 3:19 pm)robvalue Wrote: I find it strange that suspected sexism is remedied with definite sexism.

Just for the sake of ridiculousness, what happens if no women want to do the job at all? Will there be two empty seats? Or will women be forced to do the job at gunpoint?

I know, right? I mean, what woman would want to worry her pretty little head with running a company, for Pete's sake. Leave that to the men! Their wives can stay home with the children, which is exactly what they secretly want anyway.

-Teresa


That is so thoughtful of you! If only more women had your insight. Angel


Reply
#26
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 2, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Divinity Wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me.  Who's going to represent the interests of 50% of their customers?  And that's not to mention their employees.  An all male board is just making it a boys club.  And of course, more female board members means more female CEO's.  There shouldn't be such a gender gap in boardrooms across the country.  

Is this a perfect solution?  Fuck no.  But it's necessary because right now so many of these boardrooms are nothing more than boys clubs.  They certainly aren't hiring the 'best people' anyway.  They're hiring the people with all the right connections.

Do you really think the typical woman who are likely to become candidate for the board share much the interests of typical woman customer, much less those whose interested are effected but who are not customers?
Reply
#27
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 6:08 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:
(October 2, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Divinity Wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me.  Who's going to represent the interests of 50% of their customers?  And that's not to mention their employees.  An all male board is just making it a boys club.  And of course, more female board members means more female CEO's.  There shouldn't be such a gender gap in boardrooms across the country.  

Is this a perfect solution?  Fuck no.  But it's necessary because right now so many of these boardrooms are nothing more than boys clubs.  They certainly aren't hiring the 'best people' anyway.  They're hiring the people with all the right connections.

Do you really think the typical woman who are likely to become candidate for the board share much the interests of typical woman customer, much less those whose interested are effected but who are not customers?

Exactly. Leave corporate boards to male board members who surely will share the interests of typical customers, both male and female. See that? A two for one deal.

-Teresa
.
Reply
#28
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 5:52 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: I know, right? I mean, what woman would want to worry her pretty little head with running a company, for Pete's sake. Leave that to the men! Their wives can stay home with the children, which is exactly what they secretly want anyway.

-Teresa

Yoiks!

And away.

Edit: added just for fun (not directed at T's posting): https://whorulesamerica.ucsc.edu/power/d..._ceos.html
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#29
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Tres Leches Wrote:
(October 3, 2018 at 6:08 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Do you really think the typical woman who are likely to become candidate for the board share much the interests of typical woman customer, much less those whose interested are effected but who are not customers?

Exactly. Leave corporate boards to male board members who surely will share the interests of typical customers, both male and female. See that? A two for one deal.

-Teresa


Tip of the cap to you, Tres.  I'm a master of sarcasm but I am taking notes here.
Reply
#30
RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
(October 3, 2018 at 7:05 pm)Whateverist Wrote:
(October 3, 2018 at 6:16 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: Exactly. Leave corporate boards to male board members who surely will share the interests of typical customers, both male and female. See that? A two for one deal.

-Teresa


Tip of the cap to you, Tres.  I'm a master of sarcasm but I am taking notes here.

I'm on a roll today, Mark  Angel

-Teresa
.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Trans women banned from world chess LinuxGal 37 2873 October 15, 2023 at 10:10 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  MA publishes database of law enforcement disciplinary actions Nanny 0 421 August 22, 2023 at 3:23 pm
Last Post: Nanny
  Women's Rights Lek 314 18528 April 25, 2023 at 5:22 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  California about to be the first state to administer reparations!s Huggy Bear 77 3867 April 3, 2022 at 12:51 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Break any law if it’s for Jesus Fake Messiah 0 146 March 17, 2021 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  [Serious] G-20 leaders, don’t forget the women’s rights advocates rotting in Saudi prisons WinterHold 47 2200 September 23, 2020 at 6:26 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  This from the California Tourism Board. Gawdzilla Sama 74 5373 September 21, 2020 at 12:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  California High Capacity Magazine Ban Shot Down. onlinebiker 73 2465 August 25, 2020 at 1:37 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Damned Women BrianSoddingBoru4 26 2238 December 19, 2019 at 6:00 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Garlic festival shooting: Three dead in Gilroy California zebo-the-fat 30 3158 August 1, 2019 at 9:09 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)