Quote:I've debated many apologists and you are the only one I've heard from who thinks of that term as an office rather than as a being.
Dripshit redefines stupidity on a more or less daily basis. Other dipshits acknowledge him as their king.
Just Look at all Those Fulfilled Prophecies!
|
Quote:I've debated many apologists and you are the only one I've heard from who thinks of that term as an office rather than as a being. Dripshit redefines stupidity on a more or less daily basis. Other dipshits acknowledge him as their king. (December 5, 2018 at 4:13 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:Fallacy!(December 5, 2018 at 4:06 pm)Drich Wrote: canonical definition trumps your little dictionary Equivocation, you are intentional grounding the conversation! I never defined God an office. I used the nature of the triunity of the us government to show how three individual things can be considered one united thing as an every day uncontested example. I said or rather defined the word God is a title Not a name. A title like God the Father A title like God the Son A title like God the Holy Spirit. Or even Thor the god of thunder or Poseidon the god of the sea The word 'God' is not a name here but a position In Hebrew based worship the office of God is of supreme first and last authority. You can not truthfully tell me you never heard anyone say God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit? If you heard that even if your do not understand the word God in this specific instance is being used as a title it is referring to these three being being assigned the position of "God." As a title the word often times when referring to a specific deity the Father is identified. but again this is him being refered to or acknoweledged by the title "God" as "god" is not his actual name. Still with me? (December 5, 2018 at 4:42 pm)Drich Wrote: I said or rather defined the word God is a title Not a name. The rest of the planet seems to think "God" (big G, as with a proper name, "God") is a being. And since you worship three divine beings, that makes you a polytheist, no matter how you define big-G "God" as a title.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (December 5, 2018 at 4:42 pm)Drich Wrote: You can not truthfully tell me you never heard anyone say God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit? If you heard that even if your do not understand the word God in this specific instance is being used as a title it is referring to these three being being assigned the position of "God." (Bold emphasis mine) That's the Trinity which is one god being in three separate persons. Trinitarians believe in one god being, not just that the word "God" is a title. You are not a Trinitarian. You are a polytheist who hides his polytheism in equivocation.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist (December 5, 2018 at 7:45 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:The Trinity(December 5, 2018 at 4:42 pm)Drich Wrote: You can not truthfully tell me you never heard anyone say God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit? If you heard that even if your do not understand the word God in this specific instance is being used as a title it is referring to these three being being assigned the position of "God." 1+1+1=1
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb (December 5, 2018 at 7:55 pm)Amarok Wrote: The Trinity Agreed that it's bullshit. I'm only saying Drich follows a different kind of bullshit.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
1+1+1= 0 when applied to silly gods.
(December 6, 2018 at 12:22 am)Minimalist Wrote: 1+1+1= 0 when applied to silly gods. Interesting, because if you apply those values to gods, especially x3, then you're suggesting the potential to determine existence vs non-existence in quantum physics. This is part of the aether hypothesis that required a material that is both invisible and infinite. Of course it's still not fully understood within quantum physics yet. And with that, I'm not going to go far as to claim I fully understand it and hopefully I didn't flub up explaining it because it's much more complex than the short version I shared. (that was my disclaimer)
No. Nice try. Xtian math is a farce.
Period. (December 6, 2018 at 1:10 am)Minimalist Wrote: No. Nice try. Xtian math is a farce. Math is math. Besides, I believe that originated with Aristotle, so feel free to take it up with him. I guess we could just refer to you as an Xtheist. That way we can separate you from the others that accept mathematics as being universal for dealing with problems and solutions with numbers. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|