Christian trigger words

[T0 Th3 M4X]

- No, you said the opposite and asserted "no evidence."  So by what authority are you claiming an absolute?

0 = None = Absolutely nothing

To declare this, wouldn't you need to be an authority to declare what is evidence and what isn't?  If someone else says they've shared or found evidence, by what authority do you declare their claims null?

- My dog didn't barked.  I "barked" at him and told him to come on.  He listened.  If it wasn't around 2 am, I probably wouldn't have minded him trying to figure it out.

- So you attribute a special value to Angelina and the possibility of dating her.  If you assume it impossible, then it probably won't happen, but if you believe it can happen, then your odds are probably better.

What is evidence?  Have you heard of the evidence hierarchy?

I know what it is, but would be N/A here unless you're suggesting he did a study.  Plus the scope of what he suggested would be not only difficult to study but to conclude, so even if he did the grade would be at the lowest level, but the controls alone would be nearly impossible since it would need to represent the scope of mankind throughout history.

[Brian37]

Yes I did say there is no evidence And?

If every claim is true until proven false then I am dating Angelina Jolie because you cant prove I am not.

So you made yourself the determining factor of all evidence.  Got it.

If your hope is to date Angelina Jolie and she's available, then I'll wish you the best in it.

Like most of the theists I have debated since 01 on line you don't get it.

There is evidence that I exist and she exists, that is far more than your invisible friend, or magic babies or zombie god claims..

And yet you have no problem no problem not holding the position that Vishnu or Allah are real. Funny how you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor too.

Your problem like most theists, is that you refuse to apply the same logic in rejecting the claims of all others and aim it at your own position.

Not my baggage that someone  wrongfully convinced you that an old book of mythology is still relevant today. Popular still yes, but popularity only proves people like what they believe.

[T0 Th3 M4X]

So you made yourself the determining factor of all evidence.  Got it.

If your hope is to date Angelina Jolie and she's available, then I'll wish you the best in it.

Like most of the theists I have debated since 01 on line you don't get it.

There is evidence that I exist and she exists, that is far more than your invisible friend, or magic babies or zombie god claims..

And yet you have no problem no problem not holding the position that Vishnu or Allah are real. Funny how you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor too.

Your problem like most theists, is that you refuse to apply the same logic in rejecting the claims of all others and aim it at your own position.

Not my baggage that someone  wrongfully convinced you that an old book of mythology is still relevant today. Popular still yes, but popularity only proves people like what they believe.

- This isn't a debate, it's a discussion.  If you want to do a formal debate, then let me know and we can do a formal debate.   Happy to do one live even if that's your cup of tea.

- Never made any claims about Vishnu and Allah not being real.  You made that up.  If not, show me where I said such a thing.

- The problem is you keep making assertions you can't substantiate.

[Brian37]

Like most of the theists I have debated since 01 on line you don't get it.

There is evidence that I exist and she exists, that is far more than your invisible friend, or magic babies or zombie god claims..

And yet you have no problem no problem not holding the position that Vishnu or Allah are real. Funny how you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor too.

Your problem like most theists, is that you refuse to apply the same logic in rejecting the claims of all others and aim it at your own position.

Not my baggage that someone  wrongfully convinced you that an old book of mythology is still relevant today. Popular still yes, but popularity only proves people like what they believe.

- This isn't a debate, it's a discussion.  If you want to do a formal debate, then let me know and we can do a formal debate.   Happy to do one live even if that's your cup of tea.

- Never made any claims about Vishnu and Allah not being real.  You made that up.  If not, show me where I said such a thing.

- The problem is you keep making assertions you can't substantiate.

I don't need to "discuss" anything. I am perfectly capable of reading the same old book of mythology you have, that claims an invisible being cloned himself then killed himself to save his toys from a game he didn't have to set up they way he did. 

You can "discuss" this all you want, but still not going to buy it. You might as well be "discussing" the attributes of invisible pink Lamborghinis for that matter and it would still amount to the same amount of evidence, which is zero, zilch, none, nadda.

Again, there is a reason you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor and Poseidon, but ignore that there were humans back when those myths were created and sold, the inventors and buyers believed in those deities as much as you literally believe in the one you claim now.

[brewer]

butt sex

[T0 Th3 M4X]

- This isn't a debate, it's a discussion.  If you want to do a formal debate, then let me know and we can do a formal debate.   Happy to do one live even if that's your cup of tea.

- Never made any claims about Vishnu and Allah not being real.  You made that up.  If not, show me where I said such a thing.

- The problem is you keep making assertions you can't substantiate.

I don't need to "discuss" anything. I am perfectly capable of reading the same old book of mythology you have, that claims an invisible being cloned himself then killed himself to save his toys from a game he didn't have to set up they way he did. 

You can "discuss" this all you want, but still not going to buy it. You might as well be "discussing" the attributes of invisible pink Lamborghinis for that matter and it would still amount to the same amount of evidence, which is zero, zilch, none, nadda.

Again, there is a reason you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor and Poseidon, but ignore that there were humans back when those myths were created and sold, the inventors and buyers believed in those deities as much as you literally believe in the one you claim now.

- Correct, you don't need to discuss anything. I don't know that anybody is trying to force you.

- More absolutes.  You make yourself the determining factor and disregard others.  That's "ignorance."  Me, me, me, and nobody else.  Aside from that, your premise about Lamborghinis would be flawed based on you combining two categories as one.  If you start with a logical fallacy, then no point in bringing it into a discussion.

- What claims have you seen me reject about Apollo, Thor, or Poseidon?  Show me one direct claim without you as the subject claiming I said something.  More unsubstantiated nonsense about something I never said.

[Brian37]

I don't need to "discuss" anything. I am perfectly capable of reading the same old book of mythology you have, that claims an invisible being cloned himself then killed himself to save his toys from a game he didn't have to set up they way he did. 

You can "discuss" this all you want, but still not going to buy it. You might as well be "discussing" the attributes of invisible pink Lamborghinis for that matter and it would still amount to the same amount of evidence, which is zero, zilch, none, nadda.

Again, there is a reason you rightfully reject claims of Apollo and Thor and Poseidon, but ignore that there were humans back when those myths were created and sold, the inventors and buyers believed in those deities as much as you literally believe in the one you claim now.

- Correct, you don't need to discuss anything. I don't know that anybody is trying to force you.

- More absolutes.  You make yourself the determining factor and disregard others.  That's "ignorance."  Me, me, me, and nobody else.  Aside from that, your premise about Lamborghinis would be flawed based on you combining two categories as one.  If you start with a logical fallacy, then no point in bringing it into a discussion.

- What claims have you seen me reject about Apollo, Thor, or Poseidon?  Show me one direct claim without you as the subject claiming I said something.  More unsubstantiated nonsense about something I never said.

I didn't claim you were trying to force me did I?

I said you had no evidence.

[T0 Th3 M4X]

- Correct, you don't need to discuss anything. I don't know that anybody is trying to force you.

- More absolutes.  You make yourself the determining factor and disregard others.  That's "ignorance."  Me, me, me, and nobody else.  Aside from that, your premise about Lamborghinis would be flawed based on you combining two categories as one.  If you start with a logical fallacy, then no point in bringing it into a discussion.

- What claims have you seen me reject about Apollo, Thor, or Poseidon?  Show me one direct claim without you as the subject claiming I said something.  More unsubstantiated nonsense about something I never said.

I didn't claim you were trying to force me did I?

I said you had no evidence.

I, I, I  All you, huh?

[GrandizerII]

I didn't claim you were trying to force me did I?

I said you had no evidence.

I, I, I  All you, huh?

Wow ...

[Brian37]

I didn't claim you were trying to force me did I?

I said you had no evidence.

I, I, I  All you, huh?

You.... "God exists"

Me, "Fine, show me your independent worldwide majority accepted independent peer review Nobel Prize in "god theory" .... That proves you magically picked the correct deity. Trust me, if you do that, the world will beat a path to your door.