Posts: 33055
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:49 pm
(January 31, 2019 at 12:46 pm)Drich Wrote: how much more specific do I need to be the article explains it in that a woman can request a baby to be terminated even durning child birth. no issues noted, just does not want baby for whatever reason which is why I pointed out a minor defects and or race because valid reasons under this bill.
You're being as dramatic and out of hand as that woman on Faux News last night. Late term abortions are not common occurrences or even remotely advised by any medical professional.
Posts: 28334
Threads: 524
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:50 pm
Somebody's got a reading comprehension bias.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:50 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2019 at 12:51 pm by Drich.)
(January 31, 2019 at 12:31 pm)Divinity Wrote: "How dare you Pro-Choice people advocate for the lives of the women giving birth!"
are you f-ing stupid? the senario clearly show race being a valid reason for mid birth abortion. health is a non issue as abortions for health reason are already on the books!!!
let say you are giving birth to a perfect full term baby which endangers no one, but 1/2 out everyone can see it is black. That according to this bill is a valid reason for the woman to request an abortion.
to you is a baby being the wrong color a valid reason for being murdered mid natural birth?
(January 31, 2019 at 12:34 pm)Kit Wrote: Abortion rights are fine as they are. No change is necessary.
so you are against the current change to kill full term babies?
Posts: 67214
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:52 pm
Here's a q. Why do forced birthers feel the need to lie about this shit? I'm entirely certain that they could express their position without doing so.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 33055
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:52 pm
(January 31, 2019 at 12:50 pm)Drich Wrote: are you f-ing stupid?
You clearly are.
Posts: 67214
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:53 pm
(January 31, 2019 at 12:50 pm)Drich Wrote: (January 31, 2019 at 12:31 pm)Divinity Wrote: "How dare you Pro-Choice people advocate for the lives of the women giving birth!"
are you f-ing stupid? the senario clearly show race being a valid reason for mid birth abortion. health is a non issue as abortions for health reason are already on the books!!!
let say you are giving birth to a perfect full term baby which endangers no one, but 1/2 out everyone can see it is black. That according to this bill is a valid reason for the woman to request an abortion.
to you is a baby being the wrong color a valid reason for being murdered mid natural birth? The bill says no such thing, nor does the article.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 33055
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 12:54 pm
(January 31, 2019 at 12:50 pm)Drich Wrote: so you are against the current change to kill full term babies?
Full term babies aren't being killed. Stop being a drama queen.
Posts: 13392
Threads: 187
Joined: March 18, 2012
Reputation:
48
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 1:01 pm
(January 31, 2019 at 12:48 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: (January 31, 2019 at 12:46 pm)Drich Wrote: how much more specific do I need to be the article explains it in that a woman can request a baby to be terminated even durning child birth. no issues noted, just does not want baby for whatever reason which is why I pointed out a minor defects and or race because valid reasons under this bill.
No, the article doesn't explain that, nor does the bill allow for that.
Which is a damned shame, lol.
did you read the op? from the story
I posted a debate segment from the woman purposing the bill and a reoublican who oppsing it that says the oppsite:
At a recent committee hearing, Republican state delegate Todd Gilbert asked Tran to clarify exactly how late in a pregnancy doctors would be able to perform abortions. Gilbert asked if a woman who was about to give birth could request an abortion under Tran's proposed bill.
"She has physical signs that she is about to give birth. Would that be a point at which she could still request an abortion if she is so certified? She's dilating," Gilbert said.
"Mr. Chairman, that would be a, you know, a decision that the doctor, the physician and the woman would make at this point," Tran responded.
"I understand that. I'm asking if your bill allows that," Gilbert posed.
"My bill would allow that, yes," she said.
So like with any abortion she simply needs doctor approval, the only guideline in this bill is the term physical or mental distress. which again mental distress could be cause by wrong skin color. there are doctors now undercurrent rules and regs who abort per request for no reasons given. meaning so long as the woman consents and she fits the guidlines they will abort a child. so what happens when the guidlines are expanded?
Don't pretend some magical ethical force will prevent the right woman and the right doctor from finding each other to abort a baby mid birth if she so chooses. So long as the law will allow it people will do it. I'm asking you if this in your world in right?
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 1:04 pm
At work.
(January 31, 2019 at 12:46 pm)Drich Wrote: (January 31, 2019 at 12:29 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Uhm.... sorry but could you be a tad more specific?
You're asking about pregnancy related issues, yes?
how much more specific do I need to be the article explains it in that a woman can request a baby to be terminated even durning child birth. no issues noted, just does not want baby for whatever reason which is why I pointed out a minor defects and or race because valid reasons under this bill.
Sorry, am a tad busy.
Couldn't read the article yet. Plus you seem to have throw a load of your personal veiws into your opening post.
Just want to clear things up a bit.
Posts: 33055
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: not mid term, but mid birth abortions.
January 31, 2019 at 1:05 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2019 at 1:06 pm by Silver.)
Oh, dear. Clearly, Drich, being a man who's never had a vagina, is speaking of that which only a woman could understand.
That aside, however, HE is still blowing this all out of proportion.
Just because a woman "can" opt for an abortion during labor doesn't mean she will.
I swear, idiots abound in how they over dramatize things.
In all honestly, I'm surprised Christians aren't on the DNR bandwagon.
|
