President "Hickenlooper?"

[Brian37]

The next dem in a field of billions to run for the Democratic Party. Ok, outside policy, it would be fun to say "President Hickenlooper."

Love the name. NO, I am not voting on name, but just saying it a funny and fun name to say.

The late night comics would have a field day with the name alone. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/us/hi...orado.html

[Rev. Rye]

It's a shame we're spoiled for so many Democratic candidates who are actually pretty good. Of the dozen or so candidates we've got so far, the only one I'm saying "nope" to is Tulsi Gabbard, and I don't know much about Hickenlooper, but the fact that he described himself as "pragmatic," and what little of his accomplishments the Times article tells me about has already made him one of the top candidates for me.

[Brian37]

It's a shame we're spoiled for so many Democratic candidates who are actually pretty good. Of the dozen or so candidates we've got so far, the only one I'm saying "nope" to is Tulsi Gabbard, and I don't know much about Hickenlooper, but the fact that he described himself as "pragmatic," and what little of his accomplishments the Times article tells me about has already made him one of the top candidates for me.

I don't think Gabbard has a shot. I just hope regardless we don't have a repeat of 2016 no matter whom we nominate.

The left really isn't as far apart as some want to say. I just brought him up because of the name. 

So far Harris is at the top for me right now.

Biden if he jumps in would be second.

Beto if he jumps in.

Warren.

Bernie.

But regardless whom we nominate, I am voting for that person regardless.

[Rev. Rye]

Same here; to be fair, at this point, Bernie's at the top, and Hickenlooper's at #2, (and given Bernie Sander's advanced age, it wouldn't surprise me if Hickenlooper usurped that top spot.) And even if Tulsi Gabbard somehow manages to get the nomination, there's no way in Hell she'd be worse than Trump.