I thought your god was keeping you safe

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Notre Dame is on fire! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/world...-fire.html

---

Somebody please put an Eye of Sauron on this shot!

[Drich]

...and I've been ban from 10 or so atheist web site and not once ever for breaking a rule, but because I make their main guys look like idiots. or because when ever I answer it turns into just a hate fest and people drop the thread and simply spill their hate of god onto me.

In the end so what. this is not one of those places. so long as you play by the rules they let you stay, even if there is a 60+ page thread where all the atheist member tried to bully the thread owner to get rid of me again for not breaking the rules and making the main guys look like chumps. Gotta be doing something right if soo many ath-holes are screaming to the management to shut me down when they couldn't.

That said the door swings the other way as well which is why so many christians left as they had no recourse against the trolls who are out to hurt people for tring to do good.

Honestly if a softer more friendly atheist board would allow a christian to dominate then honestly I would be a member there. not that I would give up here completely, but at the same time on certain days where I did not want to be bombarded I would spend more time there.

You couldn't make a garden slug look like an idiot you vacuous, delusional dolt.

You believe that ghosts can rape women and make them pregnant with children that can walk on water, turn water into wine and feed 5,000 people with 5 loaves and two fish and who dies and comes back as a zombie.

You have no credibility if you believe in that horse shit.

You also insult those that you expect to believe too.

awhhh I broke him already  (personal insults Ad hoc attacks as we ALL know is the hallmark of a broken will.) meaning first person who can not stay on topic and is forced to name call forfeits the discussion to logical fallacy/ad hoc attacks. wow and it only took 6 pages before your great intellect crumbles beneath you.. 

Again I was trying to help when I said yu question should have centered around proof of God rather than ask for an in canonical response about the proof of his nature. Then I could have beat you over the head with the proof you sought.

Don't feel bad, while you did quite early you did your best. just remember the bar is alot higher here than most of the anti god/christian sites out there. next time, and if you want to play atheist verse christian you are going to have to bring you a game.. none of the typical tired beaten broken old atheist hat bs. can God create a rock so big he can't lift it/epricus supposed paradox. You can, just know it is all asked and answered adnauism by people who can run the ball a lot further than you can before the resort to personal attacks. 

Otherwise show me what you got!

[Lemon Curry]

I tried to interact in a reasonable manner with christards but, as I said, I was banned from every site I visited and, to cap it all off, my posts were mostly deleted.

Now I press them to provide proof of their claims.

Also, I do not like the way they are infiltrating our schools.  They want to have their unsupported and illogical creationist crap taught alongside evolution.  FFS, are you kidding?

I also have written to my MP concerning the UK government's position on faith schools.  They are considering giving faith schools financial support.  That's public money that they are using to support the brainwashing of innocent children.  What a travesty.

I don't hate christards.  I do hate what they stand for and I want them to understand the damage they do to society and the damage they have done in the past.

Bering nice, in my experience, doesn't work.

hate what we stand for?

To love our God with all of our being meaning follow his rules and morality to the best of our ability, and to love and care for our fellow humans as if we where caring for ourselves?

I can see now what horrible people christians are.. damn them for feeding the poor or giving to the needy! Damn them for paying medical bills and helping members with mortgages or reconciling broken marriages, damn them to hell for helping people get off drugs caring for the sick shutins or even visiting people in jail. 

I can see why you hate/ are allowed to hate this social group of people.

No, christard, damn christards for raping our children and then protecting the offenders. But, at least they got pell.

All the good christards do is merely a smoke screen for all the harm they have done in the past and the harm they intend to do in the future.

Wake up and smell the coffee christard.

Religtardology is dying in the UK.  It's even dying slowly in the US.

There was a time when it was illegal in the UK to be in possession of a babble that was written in a language other than Latin.  The penalty was death.  Such was the love that you christards had for society.

So christard, stick your sanctimonious bull shit as far up your ass as it will go.

[LadyForCamus]

Notre Dame is on fire! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/world...-fire.html

---

Somebody please put an Eye of Sauron on this shot!

That’s actually really sad.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Circular logic, dumb twat.  One can't use the babble to prove the horse shit in the babble.

Proof.  Where is it?

sorry no. 

Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

When the question about Any Part of NATURE of God is asked, then belief in God is already a fore gone conclusion. Meaning when you ask about a charactistic of God you are looking for a canonical answer concerning God. 
you: Again how did the Hulk gain his power? 

Me:A gamma ray experment gone wrong, 

You: proove it

me: https://www.marvel.com/comics/issue/8906...ulk_1962_1

Do you see? you are asking in cannon questions. is it then circular to answer you hulk questions with a reference to hulk comics 1? No because your question is answered in the marvel universe hulk issue 1. Like wise if you ask how do you know God acts this way, YOU are forgoing the need for proof of God. You are saying, proof of God aside how are you aware of his character? how can you know this about the hulk/god? How do you know the madder the hulk gets the strong he is? again when you ask the question you are forgoing the need for proof of the hulk therefore any answer derived from cannon is considered proof.

do you understand?

I knew this would be good, and I knew you where as dumb as a box a rocks and I know you are feeling pretty butt hurt right now.. so let me help you out so I can stop kicking your can and force feeding you your own beans..


If you want proof of God then ask for that dummy.

---

HELP! HELP! DRICH IS CALLING ME NAMES!!  I'M BEING PERSECUTED!!

Boru

Again what If I started calling you the N-word?

Given that if I were any whiter I'd be clear, I don't think it would bother me all that much.

Boru

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Notre Dame is on fire! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/world...-fire.html

---

Somebody please put an Eye of Sauron on this shot!

That’s actually really sad.

Not as sad as the kids who were molested there.

[Drich]

...and I've been ban from 10 or so atheist web site and not once ever for breaking a rule, but because I make their main guys look like idiots. or because when ever I answer it turns into just a hate fest and people drop the thread and simply spill their hate of god onto me.

In the end so what. this is not one of those places. so long as you play by the rules they let you stay, even if there is a 60+ page thread where all the atheist member tried to bully the thread owner to get rid of me again for not breaking the rules and making the main guys look like chumps. Gotta be doing something right if soo many ath-holes are screaming to the management to shut me down when they couldn't.

That said the door swings the other way as well which is why so many christians left as they had no recourse against the trolls who are out to hurt people for tring to do good.

Honestly if a softer more friendly atheist board would allow a christian to dominate then honestly I would be a member there. not that I would give up here completely, but at the same time on certain days where I did not want to be bombarded I would spend more time there.

You weren't banned for being a christard, you were banned you for being a stupid twat.  There's a difference.  There again, maybe not.

AF.com still reads, was ban for being bann under the same screen name and avatar 7 or 8 year prior. They tried to bann me several times but never broke a rule. was ban 8 years before because a member asked me a question about god or salvation and I gave him a bible quote just like I gave you. and was bann for "evangelizing/proselytizing." first offense.

So when I came back and work on that website for those many weeks or month or so, no one could find anything wrong but sought some way of eliminating me. why? too many heavy hitters/base runners striking out/being reduced to making ad hoc comments as a means of trying to save face against the christian who is not supposed to have the answers to the same old questions that have been asked since the time of christ.

An Error Has Occurred!

Sorry Guest, you are banned from using this forum!
Sorry Drich. You were previously banned in 2012. If we had realized that when you created this account you would not have been allowed back. 
This ban is not set to expire.

Again I did there what I just did to you times the whole board. times 10 different websites and or blogs or message boards.

I have real answers to real questions. You want to trying and intellectually smash people with old broken arguments you yourself are not smart enough to come up with fine. I've got all of those answers too, just ask yourself what will you do when I call your bluff? Answer? Ad hoc attack. try and kill the message by trying to discredit the messenger. that is what you will do. just mark this post and remember when you follow the pattern of the Ath-holes who's blind hate for god exceeded their ability to express it.

Or you can ask real question and I will work with you on getting answers you can understand and apply.

---

sorry no. 

Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

When the question about Any Part of NATURE of God is asked, then belief in God is already a fore gone conclusion. Meaning when you ask about a charactistic of God you are looking for a canonical answer concerning God. 
you: Again how did the Hulk gain his power? 

Me:A gamma ray experment gone wrong, 

You: proove it

me: https://www.marvel.com/comics/issue/8906...ulk_1962_1

Do you see? you are asking in cannon questions. is it then circular to answer you hulk questions with a reference to hulk comics 1? No because your question is answered in the marvel universe hulk issue 1. Like wise if you ask how do you know God acts this way, YOU are forgoing the need for proof of God. You are saying, proof of God aside how are you aware of his character? how can you know this about the hulk/god? How do you know the madder the hulk gets the strong he is? again when you ask the question you are forgoing the need for proof of the hulk therefore any answer derived from cannon is considered proof.

do you understand?

I knew this would be good, and I knew you where as dumb as a box a rocks and I know you are feeling pretty butt hurt right now.. so let me help you out so I can stop kicking your can and force feeding you your own beans..


If you want proof of God then ask for that dummy.

---

Again what If I started calling you the N-word?

Given that if I were any whiter I'd be clear, I don't think it would bother me all that much.

Boru

then white "N" word?

I use to think being called a yellow N word didn't bother me either but after it spread to everyone on the bus and at school I decided I'd rather not be called that. Because I found out the word does not so much refer to a color or skin tone than it refers to a less developed human primate..

If you like I can start calling N-oru (the "N" in N-oru would stand for the "N' word) maybe we can get the other members to call you that as well. No other disparaging remarks just one simple adjustment to your identification.. Or better yet you can change your name to N-oru and change your signature or tag line to explain the "n" stands for the N Word. and you see yourself as a white version of everything negative that word embodies, and yet you do not think it is a disparaging word your or to be referred to as. and let see if anyone disagrees. shall we?

Because again, if anyone one on the planet still see this words as offensive then it still lends itself to persecution which again proves that if one word used in a neural way can be considered persecution, then all the hate speech used here against Christians can also indeed be rightly identified as persecution, whether you ath-hole want to be identified as hypocrites or not!

---

Notre Dame is on fire! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/world...-fire.html

---

Somebody please put an Eye of Sauron on this shot!

That’s actually really sad.

in the end it is just a structure. one built to the glory of man and to extol the wealth of the church. Think of how many people the money used on that church could have helped. maybe it did just that in the way of jobs.. or maybe it was a terrible burden.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

then white "N" word?

I use to think being called a yellow N word didn't bother me either but after it spread to everyone on the bus and at school I decided I'd rather not be called that. Because I found out the word does not so much refer to a color or skin tone than it refers to a less developed human primate..

If you like I can start calling N-oru (the "N" in N-oru would stand for the "N' word) maybe we can get the other members to call you that as well. No other disparaging remarks just one simple adjustment to your identification.. Or better yet you can change your name to N-oru and change your signature or tag line to explain the "n" stands for the N Word. and you see yourself as a white version of everything negative that word embodies, and yet you do not think it is a disparaging word your or to be referred to as. and let see if anyone disagrees. shall we?

Because again, if anyone one on the planet still see this words as offensive then it still lends itself to persecution which again proves that if one word used in a neural way can be considered persecution, then all the hate speech used here against Christians can also indeed be rightly identified as persecution, whether you ath-hole want to be identified as hypocrites or not!

*shrug*  Call me whatever you like, it honestly won't bother me.  See, I'm one of those...whaddyacallem...grown-ups, so name calling doesn't worry me, nor do I consider it persecution.  It neither denies me my rights nor forbids me my freedoms.

So, no...I don't consider name-calling to be persecution in any way, shape or form.  It may feel like it to children, but not to adults.  Having experienced religious persecution first hand (I've been denied both housing and employment for having a Catholic-sounding surname), I think I can take a few invectives.

Boru

[Drich]

No, christard, damn christards for raping our children and then protecting the offenders.  But, at least they got pell.

is english a second language to you? if not show me where in the bible that Christians are commanded to rape your children and protect the offenders...

Can't? that's because we do not stand for that. in fact Jesus Himself said it would be better for someone to tie a mill stone around their neck and cast themselves into a river or better yet better for them not to have been born than cause any harm to a child.

But go ahead keep falsly accusing the church as there is a special place for those who do that as well.

All the good christards do is merely a smoke screen for all the harm they have done in the past and the harm they intend to do in the future.

look ath-hole I know the great atheist thinkers on you tube have not popularized this yet and will probably never figure this out, but there is no difference between christian and atheist, in all but one area. In truth we are all just people and better yet products of our generations and societies. The nasty shit you refer to that the church did? didn't need the church to do it. Meaning the church was used as a tool to accomplish the evil in the heart of who lived in that place at that time. that generation that soceity was so f-ed up they used the church as a reason to do what they wanted.

As I said in the first response if you can not find an incannon reason or command for an act of the church then it is not Christianity's problem nor fault. do you understand?

It would be like people blaming dungeons and dragons for douche bags killing other douche bags in the park because they roll a higher 10 sided dice number than they other guys did.

Yes they maybe playing dungeons and dragons in their minds, but D&D limits itself to graft paper and story telling. no where in any of the books does it say you must in real life and death slaughter your opponets. Those that do are not playing the game. they are using the game to play out their own evil desire. the same is true with the church unless you can find book chapter and verse that commands the evil. then be smart enough to know it is not the church nor God but evil men using the title of the church to play out their evil desires.

Wake up and smell the coffee christard.

hey ath-hole you are the one who can not tell the difference between canonical Christianity and someone playing church to get away with what they want. or you have you head so burried in the sand you can't determine something as simple as who is following the teaching od Christ to better the world around them and who is used the church as a means to resources and power to full fill their own means.

Religtardology is dying in the UK.  It's even dying slowly in the US.

Christianity died when your king took the religion and made it his own. what little God could be found in the RCC completely left when henry became a prophet by his own hand. just so he could divorce and remarry. Why it has taken your people of broken and crooked teeth hundreds of years to abandon the church of England I will never know. as God has long since abandoned that church.

There was a time when it was illegal in the UK to be in possession of a babble that was written in a language other than Latin.  The penalty was death.  Such was the love that you christards had for society.

book chapter and verse sport. again if you can not find it, it is not a christian command. meaning show me in the bible where the Vulgate was the only language allowed. In truth you can't that's because the bible was written in greek and translated into the Vulgate later, for the express purpose of keeping God's word out of reach of the common man. And again not a church rule but a state run church rule as the church could not execute anyone without the authority of the state. Do you see you blind fool? the state consumed your church which means it is your elected officials and royalty who have taken the role of god in your "church" yet you blame god.

Do you see dummy?
in this specific case,
Evil soceity, changes the bible, then demand all bibles be written in a form little to no one outside the church could read, then the state can say anything and claim the bible said it. This is why in the land of the free the state is not allow to amend or contribute to the church, because of crap you douche bags are still trying to do. which again english people know is not of God and can clearly see the state propping up the church which is the cause of your mass exodus.

So christard, stick your sanctimonious bull shit as far up your ass as it will go.

Your thought process for something like the comment above:
oops he broke my best efforts into shite, again. Not smart enought to not blame people when people do stuff in other's name.Must always blame people according to who they claim to be.. lost control of topic, must curse out Drich, lost discussion long ago, much make Drich look bad as a way to try and save face... oh but wait if he is stupid then what does that make me for loosing to him??? reset to defaul playground rules... talk about his mom-ma or ass. mama might be minority better talk about ass..

---

then white "N" word?

I use to think being called a yellow N word didn't bother me either but after it spread to everyone on the bus and at school I decided I'd rather not be called that. Because I found out the word does not so much refer to a color or skin tone than it refers to a less developed human primate..

If you like I can start calling N-oru (the "N" in N-oru would stand for the "N' word) maybe we can get the other members to call you that as well. No other disparaging remarks just one simple adjustment to your identification.. Or better yet you can change your name to N-oru and change your signature or tag line to explain the "n" stands for the N Word. and you see yourself as a white version of everything negative that word embodies, and yet you do not think it is a disparaging word your or to be referred to as. and let see if anyone disagrees. shall we?

Because again, if anyone one on the planet still see this words as offensive then it still lends itself to persecution which again proves that if one word used in a neural way can be considered persecution, then all the hate speech used here against Christians can also indeed be rightly identified as persecution, whether you ath-hole want to be identified as hypocrites or not!

*shrug*  Call me whatever you like, it honestly won't bother me.  See, I'm one of those...whaddyacallem...grown-ups, so name calling doesn't worry me, nor do I consider it persecution.  It neither denies me my rights nor forbids me my freedoms.

So, no...I don't consider name-calling to be persecution in any way, shape or form.  It may feel like it to children, but not to adults.  Having experienced religious persecution first hand (I've been denied both housing and employment for having a Catholic-sounding surname), I think I can take a few invectives.

Nigger-Boru

now lets just keep posting that till someone objects.. anyone seen huggy?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

---

*shrug*  Call me whatever you like, it honestly won't bother me.  See, I'm one of those...whaddyacallem...grown-ups, so name calling doesn't worry me, nor do I consider it persecution.  It neither denies me my rights nor forbids me my freedoms.

So, no...I don't consider name-calling to be persecution in any way, shape or form.  It may feel like it to children, but not to adults.  Having experienced religious persecution first hand (I've been denied both housing and employment for having a Catholic-sounding surname), I think I can take a few invectives.

Nigger-Boru

now lets just keep posting that till someone objects.. anyone seen huggy?

Happy to.  I'll be glad to explain to Huggy that when it's attached to my name, it only means negative things about white people (your suggestion).

Boru