[Serious] Time to embrace Islam!

[R00tKiT]

Way to side step the pedophile babbler.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of..._tradition

So, where is "Muslims worship Muhammad" in the article?

I am waiting for your equally eloquent Qur'an to disprove ours.

[R00tKiT]

Duplicate.

[R00tKiT]

Moderator Notice
image removed

Boru

Isn't this islamophobic ? or at least hatred speech ?

The depth of thought you display when it comes to Islam amazes me

---

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Moderator Notice
image removed

Boru

Isn't this islamophobic ? or at least hatred speech ?

The depth of thought you display when it comes to Islam amazes me

---

Way to side step the pedophile babbler.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of..._tradition

So, where did you find "Muslims worship Muhammad" in the link ?

We're all waiting for your equally eloquent Qur'an to prove Muhammad is a babbler

No, it's anti-terrorist, not anti-Muslim.

Boru

[no one]

The depth of believers self-inflicted boohooism amazes me.

[R00tKiT]

No, it's anti-terrorist, not anti-Muslim.

Boru

And where is terrorism even mentioned ? Your reply is clearly anti-Muslim, and proves how retarded your view of Muslims, and the forum's stance on hatred speech, are.

[The Valkyrie]

Because the Abrahamic religions are responsible for many evils in the world.

Compared to practically everything else.

Anything can be responsible for evil. Science produced nuclear bombs, does at make scientific inquiry any less reliable ? Of course religions can be harmful if misunderstood.
Lots of beliefs are much more harmful (eugenics, white supremacy, etc.)

It’s true of many things.
But none so continuously and consistently as the Abrahamic religions.

[The Valkyrie]

No, it's anti-terrorist, not anti-Muslim.

Boru

And where is terrorism even mentioned ? Your reply is clearly anti-Muslim, and proves how retarded your view of Muslims, and the forum's stance on hatred speech, are.

If it was a picture of a white supremacist and the caption was about a look you get when someone elses swastika is shinier than yours, would that be hate speech too?

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

No, it's anti-terrorist, not anti-Muslim.

Boru

And where is terrorism even mentioned ? Your reply is clearly anti-Muslim, and proves how retarded your view of Muslims, and the forum's stance on hatred speech, are.

I thought the bit in the caption about the explosive belt was a mention of terrorism.  Did you miss that?

Some Muslims are terrorists.  So are some Christians and Jews.  Buddhists and Hindus have their share of terrorists.  Get over yourself.

Boru

[R00tKiT]

It’s true of many things.
But none so continuously and consistently as the Abrahamic religions.

I think you should be slightly more specific at how religious evil outweighs everything else. World wars for example didn't have anything to do with religion, shouldn't whatever caused them be considered more evil ?

I thought the bit in the caption about the explosive belt was a mention of terrorism.  Did you miss that?

The subject is about islam, not terrorism and explosive belts, did you miss that? Bringing that up is unwarranted and stupid.