Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 23, 2024, 6:37 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Human Rights Section
#11
RE: Human Rights Section
I’m all for it.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#12
RE: Human Rights Section
Everyone missed my out u endo joke earlier. I demand justice. Bad jokes matter.
Reply
#13
RE: Human Rights Section
(July 10, 2020 at 7:16 am)Editz Wrote: @BrianSoddingBoru4 Politicians talk about just about everything, so you think there's no need for subfora and that all we need is a politics forum? Delete all other fora then! Reducto ad absurdum. I studies economics at university - there's a whole lot more to it than the surface skimming status quo soundbites the politicians offer, trust me. 2c tru facts. Social science subforum FTW.


It isn’t JUST what politicians talk about. They talk about economics primarily because it is so intertwined with politics.

Here’s a test. Write a short (1000 words, whatever) essay on economics without mentioning or alluding to politics.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#14
RE: Human Rights Section
(July 10, 2020 at 7:18 am)Brian37 Wrote: Everyone missed my out u endo joke earlier. I demand justice. Bad jokes matter.

There’s a difference between ‘missed’ and ‘ignored’.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#15
RE: Human Rights Section
@BrianSoddingBoru4 I don't think that a section created for "Open up to some light hearted discussion in this off-topic area" like the Off Topics section -hence its name- or a section made for "Discussions of a philosophical nature should go here. We also provide an area for formal debates in the Debate Area sub-forum" would relate to Human Rights even closely. But thank you anyways for sharing your opinion.

@Eleven thank you very much for sharing your opinion.
Reply
#16
RE: Human Rights Section
For the record I agree with Boru on this.

However, even if we do agree on the creation of a new subforum we will have to wait for a red to implement it.
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#17
RE: Human Rights Section
Are we talking about home economics? I think I made patty cakes once in primary school Dunno
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#18
RE: Human Rights Section
(July 10, 2020 at 10:00 am)ignoramus Wrote: Are we talking about home economics? I think I made patty cakes once in primary school Dunno

Bloody show off.

Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
Reply
#19
RE: Human Rights Section
(July 10, 2020 at 5:37 am)Editz Wrote: Economics and psychology subfora, on the other hand, would enrich the forum in general greatly methinks. Brion345s recent placement of his "welfare" topic in the Politics subforum illustrates the need for the former...maybe, thinking on, one subforum called "social sciences" to contrast "physical sciences" - incorporating sociology, economics, psychology (Descartes fail but still)...hang on, I'll pull in the wikipedia definition:

Quote:Social science is the branch of science devoted to the study of societies and the relationships among individuals within those societies. The term was formerly used to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 19th century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic disciplines, including anthropologyarchaeologyeconomicshuman geographylinguisticsmanagement sciencemedia studiesmusicologypolitical sciencepsychologywelfare and nursing studies[1] and .

You can suggest that in a separate topic; I'm oblivious to why you have chosen this topic to post your idea. Very unprofessional.

(July 10, 2020 at 8:22 am)The Valkyrie Wrote: For the record I agree with Boru on this.

However, even if we do agree on the creation of a new subforum we will have to wait for a red to implement it.

Indeed.

(July 10, 2020 at 7:24 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(July 10, 2020 at 7:16 am)Editz Wrote: @BrianSoddingBoru4 Politicians talk about just about everything, so you think there's no need for subfora and that all we need is a politics forum? Delete all other fora then! Reducto ad absurdum. I studies economics at university - there's a whole lot more to it than the surface skimming status quo soundbites the politicians offer, trust me. 2c tru facts. Social science subforum FTW.


It isn’t JUST what politicians talk about. They talk about economics primarily because it is so intertwined with politics.

Here’s a test. Write a short (1000 words, whatever) essay on economics without mentioning or alluding to politics.

Boru
Quote:https://atheistforums.org/rules.php

Trolling is not allowed. Troll behavior includes, but is not limited to repeatedly:
  • Making provocative posts.
  • Making posts that are unrelated / irrelevant to the thread or conversation subject.
  • Disrupting normal discussion.
  • Provoking specific members by referring to them negatively on your profile/signature.

How the hell did they make a troll a mod?
Stop trolling if you have any shame or respect for yourself..this forum changed tons.
Reply
#20
RE: Human Rights Section
(July 10, 2020 at 6:46 pm)WinterHold Wrote:
(July 10, 2020 at 5:37 am)Editz Wrote: Economics and psychology subfora, on the other hand, would enrich the forum in general greatly methinks. Brion345s recent placement of his "welfare" topic in the Politics subforum illustrates the need for the former...maybe, thinking on, one subforum called "social sciences" to contrast "physical sciences" - incorporating sociology, economics, psychology (Descartes fail but still)...hang on, I'll pull in the wikipedia definition:

You can suggest that in a separate topic; I'm oblivious to why you have chosen this topic to post your idea. Very unprofessional.

Are some people paid to post here?  If not, how can this be unprofessional?
  
“If you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.” — Confucius
                                      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What is the adult section? FrustratedFool 33 2623 August 26, 2023 at 6:58 pm
Last Post: Ravenshire
  [Serious] Human Rights Section: the voting topic WinterHold 64 6867 July 22, 2020 at 4:07 pm
Last Post: Porcupine
  Reasonable way for a new section to be added Foxaèr 4 904 July 15, 2020 at 5:42 pm
Last Post: Porcupine
  Blog section? *Deidre* 112 14126 May 12, 2018 at 3:08 am
Last Post: Little lunch
  Which would be the appropriate section for certain movie discussions Astonished 2 1240 January 2, 2017 at 8:37 pm
Last Post: Astonished
  Donald Trump section in the forum. paulpablo 18 1975 December 1, 2016 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: Aoi Magi
  Adding a "Life Stories" section to the forum Heat 7 1841 December 2, 2015 at 2:22 am
Last Post: Heat
  Rant section DIRTY_DEEDS_93 2 1173 March 23, 2015 at 2:48 am
Last Post: rexbeccarox
  Economics section? Something completely different 6 2402 September 29, 2013 at 9:55 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Vote - Sports Section Rayaan 59 14054 September 14, 2013 at 6:31 pm
Last Post: festive1



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)