The Official Gosh Darned Biden Thread

[arewethereyet]

Merely spouting and defending their ideology and honor as a movement, we know.

Sounds like you got soft sold.  Anywho, the alt right ate the mainstreams lunch.  That's why they're groveling at the foot of the troll king and lurching towards open fascism as we speak.  The alt right rallies around the politics of white grievance.  That's the tie that binds.  Or, as you would put it, anti wokeness.

---

As you noted in the question..I'm against kiddie koncentration kamps, not any particular candidate or politician officiating over them.  Shouldn't even be an option.  We can agree here and disagree over the articles of white grievance, which we do..explicitly, and it's those views, that disagreement, that identifies you as a vocal disseminator of alt right talking points.

Immigration is not going to stop because some separatists want it to. There's no chance their wishes come to pass. They lost a long time ago. Game over. They are a terrorist threat to an extent but they're not exactly slaughtering people left and right and leaving mountains of bodies.

59 percent of Americans support free speech. https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/stat...a#overview Are you implying that 59 percent of Americans are pushing alt-right talking points because they support free speech? The alt-right doesn't own the concept of free speech. The world is going crazy at this moment in time though, and even the ACLU is abandoning free speech when they used to defend the Klan having the right to do rallies like real liberals would.

71 percent of Americans believe that political correctness has done more to silence important discussions our society needs to have. https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/stat...ce-america Are these 71 percent of Americans all pushing alt-right talking points because they take issue with PC/ woke culture?

I'm not defending the honour of these people because I agree with everything they say. I just think it makes no sense at all to try to group Richard Spencer in with Jordan Peterson and act like they are the same thing when it's apples and oranges. If I thought Jordan Peterson was a white separatist, I wouldn't be defending him as a person. You don't see me defending Richard Spencer.

So, you glossed right over the lie you tried to pass off about never being warned for trolling by posting this heaping pile.

If anyone wants to double check they can click on the warning % on the top right of any of your posts.

Your first link regarding free speech is from 2017...are you aware that's old data?  

You are a troll and a liar and you prove it on the regular.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Immigration is not going to stop because some separatists want it to. There's no chance their wishes come to pass. They lost a long time ago. Game over. They are a terrorist threat to an extent but they're not exactly slaughtering people left and right and leaving mountains of bodies.

59 percent of Americans support free speech. https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/stat...a#overview Are you implying that 59 percent of Americans are pushing alt-right talking points because they support free speech? The alt-right doesn't own the concept of free speech. The world is going crazy at this moment in time though, and even the ACLU is abandoning free speech when they used to defend the Klan having the right to do rallies like real liberals would.

71 percent of Americans believe that political correctness has done more to silence important discussions our society needs to have. https://www.cato.org/survey-reports/stat...ce-america Are these 71 percent of Americans all pushing alt-right talking points because they take issue with PC/ woke culture?

I'm not defending the honour of these people because I agree with everything they say. I just think it makes no sense at all to try to group Richard Spencer in with Jordan Peterson and act like they are the same thing when it's apples and oranges. If I thought Jordan Peterson was a white separatist, I wouldn't be defending him as a person. You don't see me defending Richard Spencer.

So, you glossed right over the lie you tried to pass off about never being warned for trolling by posting this heaping pile.

If anyone wants to double check they can click on the warning % on the top right of any of your posts.

Your first link regarding free speech is from 2017...are you aware that's old data?  

You are a troll and a liar and you prove it on the regular.

What was the trolling warning for? The comment I made saying an accuser shouldn't be believed if their friends said they were planning on accusing actors of rape to get a money settlement? I would hardly call that trolling. Liars will be disbelieved. That's the consequence of being a liar. Actions have consequences in life.

If I troll on the regular why haven't you been warning me for it? You don't seem to have the evidence to back up your assertions. Speaking of fake rape accusers, I like how you follow me around accusing me of rape with no evidence. This is why "believe all women" is a farce. A woman doesn't even have to have met you to follow you around and harass you by accusing you of rape. You are proof of that.

[Fireball]

She isn't "following you around". Moderators have as part of their duties the disgusting requirement that they have to read what people are writing.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Keep inventing excuses. The Alt-Right are white nationalists no matter how much you twist and contort the facts.

: a right-wing, primarily online political movement or grouping based in the U.S. whose members reject mainstream conservative politics and espouse extremist beliefs and policies typically centered on ideas of white nationalism

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alt-right


And keep mentioning this definition every time you try and twist the truth.

[Irreligious Atheist]

She isn't "following you around". Moderators have as part of their duties the disgusting requirement that they have to read what people are writing.

Moderators have the requirement of accusing members of statutory rape with no evidence?

[The Architect Of Fate]

Moderators have the requirement of accusing members of statutory rape with no evidence?

Troll

[arewethereyet]

She isn't "following you around". Moderators have as part of their duties the disgusting requirement that they have to read what people are writing.

Moderators have the requirement of accusing members of statutory rape with no evidence?

Rave on.  You are the one who brought up the relationship with a younger girl.  

As for warning you for being a liar...you'd have been long gone.  Being a liar and a disgusting human in general isn't against the rules.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Moderators have the requirement of accusing members of statutory rape with no evidence?

Rave on.  You are the one who brought up the relationship with a younger girl.  

As for warning you for being a liar...you'd have been long gone.  Being a liar and a digusting human in general isn't against the rules.

People have relationships with 16 year olds. I bet 90 percent of us have.

You are setting women back 50 years with your fake rape accusations. Do better.

[The Architect Of Fate]

[Irreligious Atheist]

Moderators have the requirement of accusing members of statutory rape with no evidence?

Troll

Grow up, sungula. You may not have seen the posts, but she accused me of sleeping with underage girls. Defending yourself from false claims is not being a troll. You, being Canadian, know that 16 is not underage in any province. I was also less than 2 years older than the girl. It is very inappropriate for a moderator in a position of power to be harassing posters by calling them rapists over and over. That is actual trolling.