The government should have no right to prevent any organizations of consenting adults, so long as there is no force, fraud or coercion involved. If 10,000 people want to have a mega group marriage they can do so as far as I'm concerned.
.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 27, 2025, 6:51 pm
Thread Rating:
|
They win this time.... (Wisconsin)
|
 (March 11, 2011 at 4:18 pm)theVOID Wrote: The government should have no right to prevent any organizations of consenting adults, so long as there is no force, fraud or coercion involved. If 10,000 people want to have a mega group marriage they can do so as far as I'm concerned. Social liberalism at its best! 
Quote:"An individual has not started living until he can rise above the narrow confines of his individualistic concerns to the broader concerns of all humanity. "  (March 11, 2011 at 4:13 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote:(March 11, 2011 at 4:08 pm)theVOID Wrote: We should remove the power government has to set up these conditions in the first place. Uh-huh... Russian history has me disagreeing here. Specifically where communism took over after ousting the parliamentary pseudo-government. There was a horrid civil war over it. A two party system would never have worked under communism (as it appeared in Russia). Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
 (March 11, 2011 at 4:05 pm)HeyItsZeus Wrote: No one said the majority of Americans are smart... we are sheep like the rest of the world. Lobbying has a place in a successful democracy, Bad Lobbylists however can go rot in hell (March 11, 2011 at 4:18 pm)theVOID Wrote: The government should have no right to prevent any organizations of consenting adults, so long as there is no force, fraud or coercion involved. If 10,000 people want to have a mega group marriage they can do so as far as I'm concerned. With organization of the masses comes power to the masses. Not a wise decision to allow it in all cases. Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
By what right do you prevent it?
.
(March 11, 2011 at 5:50 pm)theVOID Wrote: By what right do you prevent it? The 'right' to stability? You know, i really don't believe in 'rights'. It doesn't make a lot of sense to allow organization of the people along lines where they feel empowered or worse: entitled. Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
 (March 11, 2011 at 5:59 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:(March 11, 2011 at 5:50 pm)theVOID Wrote: By what right do you prevent it? Empowering people is fine, we should strive to empower more people, particularly minorities. Entitled, now that's a different story. When people feel they deserve something without earning it, well that's not okay.
"If an injury must be done to a man, it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared" - Niccolo Macchiavelli
Ahendant Wrote:That's a duty Duty, right, wish, whatever. Ubermensch Wrote:Empowering people is fine, we should strive to empower more people, particularly minorities. Entitled, now that's a different story. When people feel they deserve something without earning it, well that's not okay. Empowering people is only fine so long as they are all on your side. After that, it is no longer 'fine'. I agree about entitlement, hence my view on it
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
