Noteworthy News

[The Architect Of Fate]

Yes, it is a pointless attempt by you to delusionally jerk yourself off and again. I printed no misinformation nor did you correct any. I was 100% correct that the statement was made by one loon. Nor have I backed off on anything as I never explicitly supported BLM ORG I support BLM as a movement that far exceeds the ORG. My comment on your fallacies was completely correct and clearly didn't even read my whole comment because make a clarification. And no your the only one here who anyway resembles a Q-Anon. Nor do i give a shit what a moron like you respects

Again you lose. Try again

[The Grand Nudger]

You never seem to recall where you got any of your shit from IA, all you know for certain is that it absolutely isn't coming from the people producing it....so...?

How often do you imagine yourself vindicated or doing glory laps over BLM, on an average day?

So BLM endorsing Smollett is not a big enough news story for the thread? Or you just don't want people pointing out that it took you and Helios years before finally backing off from your support of Q-Anon? And Helios posted misinformation saying it was only one loon, and I am allowed to respond and correct misinformation. At least it appears that you guys are no longer willing to defend Q-Anon... I mean BLM, as an organization, so respect to you for seeing you were wrong and changing your position.

The trouble, as ever, is that you imagine yourself to be engaged with BLM in some sort of zero sum deathmatch in which vindication is ever elusive - but just around the corner all the same. 

You fail to understand that your version of the story is about blm la specifically....in response to a case in chicago... no less. 

You fail to understand why such a movement would find it hard to trust police regardless of convictions.

You fail to understand that any organization which stands with people who end up convicted more often than not already stands for the convicted and un-convicted alike and regardless.

You fail to understand that a person can support an organization in spite of disagreeing with any given position it espouses.

It's all rahowa, all the time, in your silly head...and other people, people in blm, people here on the boards... just don't default to this.  That's why it never works, in case you were wondering. You wrote yourself off long ago, and don't appear to have any interest in rehabilitation.

But go ahead, unironically re-reassert that you're not a racist whackaloon, because racist whackaloon shit is just facts, and that you're just correcting the non racist whackaloons misapprehension of said fact. You could always try something [i[]other[/i] than reinforcing the white supremacist claptrap you've (allegedly unwittingly) ingested...but past behavior and smart money says you're going to do the other thing instead.

: shrugs :

Don't know what to tell you buddy. The situation for black america is not changed by jussie smollet being convicted, nor would it be changed if he were found innocent, so why would support or opinions on that issue change depending on how the legal wind blew for the individual? Doesn't make a lick of sense, but here you are...apparently imagining that the conviction of jussie smollett is as close as you can get to a personal victory, whatever that means to you. Fucking nutball.

[Irreligious Atheist]

So now no one here ever supported the BLM organization in the first place and only supported the statement that "black lives matter", eh Helios? Is that the pivot we're going with now? And in defense of Jussie Smollett, I've got sympathy for him and don't want him getting any jail time (so racist, I know, eh race hustlers lol?). Just probation and a fine.

---

So BLM endorsing Smollett is not a big enough news story for the thread? Or you just don't want people pointing out that it took you and Helios years before finally backing off from your support of Q-Anon? And Helios posted misinformation saying it was only one loon, and I am allowed to respond and correct misinformation. At least it appears that you guys are no longer willing to defend Q-Anon... I mean BLM, as an organization, so respect to you for seeing you were wrong and changing your position.

The trouble, as ever, is that you imagine yourself to be engaged with BLM in some sort of zero sum deathmatch. 

You fail to understand that your version of the story is about blm la specifically....in response to a case in chicago... no less. 

You fail to understand why such a movement would find it hard to trust police regardless of convictions.

You fail to understand that any organization which stands with people who end up convicted more often than not already stands for the convicted and un-convicted alike and regardless.

You fail to understand that a person can support an organization in spite of disagreeing with any given position it espouses.

It's all rahowa, all the time, in your silly head...and other people, people in blm, people here on the boards... just don't default to this.  That's why it never works, in case you were wondering.  You wrote yourself off long ago, and don't appear to have any interest in rehabilitation.

The official BLM website posted and endorsed what the BLM LA co-founder said. This isn't just a case of BLM LA putting this out there, which would be bad enough.

Of course it's hard to trust police. They don't have to believe police. Jussie and the boys are on camera doing a dry run, and you have all of the other evidence. There is no need to "believe the police". That's not what this case is about. If they had said, Jussie made a mistake and we still stand behind him, then that's fine, but they called him honourable and said he should be believed.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Once again I can't speak for anyone else but I supported the movement whether that included the ORG or not made no difference as BLM is way bigger than the ORG. That's not a pivot idiot that's simply a fact. No, he should go to jail for a very long time so again another dumb take by you.

So again you lose ....Try again 

---

Again whether A BLM website endorses it is irrelevant. The movement is far larger than that . So you have won nothing here 

So again you lose ....Try again  

[Irreligious Atheist]

Once again I can't speak for anyone else but I supported the movement whether that included the ORG or not made no difference as BLM is way bigger than the ORG. That's not a pivot idiot that's simply a fact. No, he should go to jail for a very long time so again another dumb take by you.

So again you lose ....Try again 

---

Again whether A BLM website endorses it is irrelevant. The movement is far larger than that . So you have won nothing here 

So again you lose ....Try again  

So now you won't even admit whether you supported the BLM org or not. And I'm the racist one? Why should Jussie go to jail? He's a first time offender and probation is about right for that, not jail time. Why do you want to lock black, non-violent first time offenders up, Helios?

[The Grand Nudger]

Nut...ball.

[Irreligious Atheist]

Nut...ball.

Hehe. Yes. Racist nut ball. Banned twice for defending an innocent black man, and proud to die on that hill. I'm now defending a non-violent black man from having to serve any jail time, while Q-Anon Helios wants to lock the black man up and throw away the key for his first time, non-violent criminal offense. That adds up. Cheers. Have a good day.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Nut...ball.

Hehe. Yes. Racist nut ball. Banned twice for defending an innocent black man, and proud to die on that hill. I'm now defending a non-violent black man from having to serve any jail time, while Q-Anon Helios wants to lock the black man up and throw away the key for his first time, non-violent criminal offense. That adds up. Cheers. Have a good day.

It must be a lot of work to be a racist without saying you’re a racist. Seems exhausting.

Boru

[The Grand Nudger]

I feel like IA should take his concerns to the Only Jussie Smollets Life Matters movement chapter of Canadia. I suspect they'll be labeled a domestic terrorist organization, but I guess you might not actually be able to pick your friends, like we always say.

---

It must be a lot of work to be a racist without saying you’re a racist. Seems exhausting.

Boru

It's alot less work to either lean into racism, or stop consuming racist claptrap.  In both cases, the change amounts do doing less or none of a thing.

-and yet.....

[The Architect Of Fate]

So now you won't even admit whether you supported the BLM org or not.

Why would I admit something that never happened? As i said i support the BLM movement. I never said I supported the ORG and BLM is much bigger than the ORG. So nice try 

 And I'm the racist one? Why should Jussie go to jail?

Wanting a guilty person who committed fraud for sympathy to go to jail isn't racist. But nice try 

 He's a first time offender and probation is about right for that, not jail time. Why do you want to lock black, non-violent first time offenders up, Helios?

Because committing fraud should be a jailable offense regardless of race. 

---

Hehe. Yes. Racist nut ball. Banned twice for defending an innocent black man, and proud to die on that hill. I'm now defending a non-violent black man from having to serve any jail time, while Q-Anon Helios wants to lock the black man up and throw away the key for his first time, non-violent criminal offense. That adds up. Cheers. Have a good day.

Yes actually it does add up perfectly 

1. Defending a black person doesn't make you not a racist. Nor was that why you were banned.

2. Wanting to go easy on a black person doesn't make you not a racist. 

3. Wanting a fraudster to go to jail for a long time doesn't make a person a racist.

4. You are the only person here whose mindset resembles Q-Anon.

Now that your fallacies and bad reasoning have been refuted. You lose again. 

---

Hehe. Yes. Racist nut ball. Banned twice for defending an innocent black man, and proud to die on that hill. I'm now defending a non-violent black man from having to serve any jail time, while Q-Anon Helios wants to lock the black man up and throw away the key for his first time, non-violent criminal offense. That adds up. Cheers. Have a good day.

It must be a lot of work to be a racist without saying you’re a racist. Seems exhausting.

Boru

Well he has to convince himself 

---

Essentially IA has employed the Legal version of "I have black friends"