Thumpalumpagus:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...penditures
I may have exaggerated a little. But US military spending is 1000 Billion Dollars. China is 300 Billion. Russia is 150 Billion. Other important military powers are somewhere around 80 Billion.
What I meant is that Democrats in the US are in most cases willing to embrace this “Police of the world” role for the US. Isolationists are completely unwilling. This debate was there since the early 20th century.
But you don’t put 1000 Billion into your military if it’s just for protecting your own territory right?
/ I know that what I am saying is problematic in many ways. Ideally, we need to get to a point in which the Society of Nations (or the UN if you like) will take this policing role and ensure that some sort of international legal world order prevails in this world.
That’s Immanuel Kant philosophy. It’s not empty talk. By the way the likes of Donald Trump do not believe in such things. And until we get there, there might be this necessity-based reality on the ground.
So I don’t really know. But there has to be some sort international order in this world right? Even if we are in the process of getting to a more reason-based and more law-based international world order, this will have to happen at some point, and until then, the US is still the “big guy in the block” as Barrack Obama said once.
But as a word of warning: There was an Indian Guru who predicted that at some point the US might end up being in war with all the rest of the world. So I also hope that your politicians today and in the future do not take this “big guy in the block” thing to another level.
As I said: There should be elections in Venezuela as soon as possible and the previous Afghan experience should not be repeated