Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 3:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
forbidding people to love each other
#11
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:17 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 3:28 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: I was just looking at WLC’s essay on how gay people should not be in relationships, how AIDS is a punishment from God, how gay people should seek a cure to become "normal". Source

This makes me think how sad and pathetic do you have to be to be agitated by the existence of homosexuals?
And after all these centuries of novels and plays of forbidden love you would think people would get the OBVIOUS lesson that you can not forbid some couple to love each other. He is literally the most pathetic, saddest, and generic villain in the repertoire of villains who wants to prevent people to be happy.

Some of the stuff he writes:

Again, even if he is right about the genes (although he doesn’t seem to, and genes do seem to play the role) how mental do you have to be bothered if someone is happier in life if he/ she chooses a homosexual way of life?

Genes don't play any role in determining one's sexual orientation

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6

It's self-evident that being homosexual is a deviation from nature. The very purpose of sexual attraction influenced by hormones is procreation. Engaging in gay/lesbian relationships is an inefficient way of allocating natural resources (us, in this case) . It's a pathology by definition.

That’s not exactly what the article says. You seem to have not read (or read and ignored) this pretty important caveat:

Quote:This suggests that there are a lot of genes that influence sexual behaviour, many of which researchers haven’t found yet, says Ganna. An even larger sample size could help to identify those missing variants, he says.

But Ganna cautions that these SNPs can’t be used to reliably predict sexual preferences in any individual, because no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours.

While it appears to be true that there is no single ‘gay gene’ there’s a very real probability that sexual orientation may be determined by a complex of genes.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#12
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Here I was thinking the purpose of sex was orgasm. Wrong all these years- it’s about the allocation of resources. Adding that to my pillow talk repertoire.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#13
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:21 pm)no one Wrote: Read it and weep kpop, you absolute asstard!
Also appealing to something being natural or unnatural is a blatant naturalistic fallacy

(June 30, 2021 at 5:30 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 5:17 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Genes don't play any role in determining one's sexual orientation

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6

It's self-evident that being homosexual is a deviation from nature. The very purpose of sexual attraction influenced by hormones is procreation. Engaging in gay/lesbian relationships is an inefficient way of allocating natural resources (us, in this case) . It's a pathology by definition.

That’s not exactly what the article says. You seem to have not read (or read and ignored) this pretty important caveat:

Quote:This suggests that there are a lot of genes that influence sexual behaviour, many of which researchers haven’t found yet, says Ganna. An even larger sample size could help to identify those missing variants, he says.

But Ganna cautions that these SNPs can’t be used to reliably predict sexual preferences in any individual, because no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours.

While it appears to be true that there is no single ‘gay gene’ there’s a very real probability that sexual orientation may be determined by a complex of genes.

Boru
He only read the title because it said what he wants to believe  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#14
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:33 pm)Helios Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 5:21 pm)no one Wrote: Read it and weep kpop, you absolute asstard!
Also appealing to something being natural or unnatural is a blatant naturalistic fallacy

Fair point. Flush toilets and electric lights are both ‘deviations from nature’, but I’m willing to wager that Kloro has both in his house.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#15
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Why is it that those with the tiniest intellect so brazenly flaunt it?
Reply
#16
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:21 pm)no one Wrote: Read it and weep kpop, you absolute asstard!

What a stunning fact... no one. I didn't know animals were your role models of sexuality.
Reply
#17
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I like your mom!

Truth be told, I fucked her in the ass, and she shit you out!
Reply
#18
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 5:33 pm)Helios Wrote: Also appealing to something being natural or unnatural is a blatant naturalistic fallacy

Fair point. Flush toilets and electric lights are both ‘deviations from nature’, but I’m willing to wager that Kloro has both in his house.

Boru
I mean if we went by what nature demands cannibalism should be a normal practice 

https://theconversation.com/cannibalism-...boo-121678

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/cultu...ill-schutt
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#19
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 5:30 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: While it appears to be true that there is no single ‘gay gene’ there’s a very real probability that sexual orientation may be determined by a complex of genes.

Boru

Even if it is.. Things like criminal behavior and psychopathy are influenced by genes too. That doesn't make criminality right.
Reply
#20
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Quote:What a stunning fact... no one. I didn't know animals were your role models of sexuality.
Holy strawmen batman  Hehe

Quote:Even if it is.. Things like criminal behavior and psychopathy are influenced by genes too. That doesn't make criminality right.
Again no one argued that
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A thing about religious (and other) people and the illusion of free will ShinyCrystals 265 23348 December 6, 2023 at 12:21 am
Last Post: Harry Haller
  What is a theist other then the basic definition? Quill01 4 866 August 1, 2022 at 11:16 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Flat Earther, and other conspiracy theories. Are they mostly atheists? Ferrocyanide 95 10465 April 26, 2021 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Tomatoshadow2
  "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" ignoramus 121 24211 March 5, 2021 at 6:42 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Love of God vs love of a woman Mystic 51 7224 September 26, 2018 at 9:49 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Proof of Jesus through Personal testimony. Christianity over other faiths orthodox-man 46 9583 January 29, 2018 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Why do some moderates get so attached to other believers? Der/die AtheistIn 4 1414 December 19, 2017 at 9:28 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  I had a religious experience the other night I_am_not_mafia 34 6176 November 22, 2017 at 9:44 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Are you and your significant other a "real" power couple? Silver 19 3289 August 4, 2016 at 8:13 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Why do people on here act as if Islam if no worse than any other faith? Hoppingbunny 64 13552 April 24, 2016 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: paulpablo



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)