RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 6:10 am
My mind only hears Natasha. I wonder if it knows squirrel and moose?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
|
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 6:10 am
My mind only hears Natasha. I wonder if it knows squirrel and moose?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 6:15 am
(This post was last modified: October 3, 2021 at 6:16 am by Duty.)
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 7:03 am
(October 3, 2021 at 2:15 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 2:03 am)Foxaire Wrote: In what way has science ever involved itself in directly making claims against religion?I
"The world is my country; all of humanity are my brethren; and to do good deeds is my religion." (Thomas Paine)
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 7:05 am
(October 3, 2021 at 7:03 am)Gwaithmir Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 2:15 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote: A responder's questions need to be focused on line 3 & 4 of OP Isn't it cute how Sheldon thinks he's in charge. RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 7:08 am
(October 3, 2021 at 6:15 am)Lawz Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 6:10 am)brewer Wrote: My mind only hears Gnasher. I wonder if it knows squirrel and moose? Nah, that's to British. This one feels more Pottsylvanian.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 9:12 am
(October 3, 2021 at 1:41 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote: -MS/abt Biostatistics, published, tours lecture circuit English is technically my native language. Local variation has created a divergance in the parlance. Not at work. RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 10:06 am
(October 3, 2021 at 2:15 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 2:03 am)Foxaire Wrote: In what way has science ever involved itself in directly making claims against religion?I My, aren't we the one.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 10:25 am
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 11:17 am
(October 3, 2021 at 2:15 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 2:03 am)Foxaire Wrote: In what way has science ever involved itself in directly making claims against religion?I I strongly suggest you re-read the forum rules.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken. RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
October 3, 2021 at 7:49 pm
(October 3, 2021 at 11:17 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:(October 3, 2021 at 2:15 am)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote: A responder's questions need to be focused on line 3 & 4 of OP The rules state that I have to answer to each responder? The rules state I can't ignore a responder? The rules state I have to engage with a responder who won't focus on OP topic? Gee, I guess I do need to review the rules |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|